Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/59 implement simple fault tree cutsets #61

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 22, 2024

Conversation

kostobog
Copy link
Collaborator

@kostobog kostobog commented Feb 9, 2024

No description provided.

@kostobog kostobog requested a review from blcham February 9, 2024 16:25
Copy link
Contributor

@blcham blcham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

.

@blcham blcham self-requested a review February 11, 2024 23:21
Copy link
Contributor

@blcham blcham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just please remove the commented code.

Moreover, within the FaultTreeControler, I found the REST method to compute cuts but did not find the REST method to retrieve cuts. Thus, make sure it is retrievable from REST API.

Also, consider making some JUNIT tests if they are simple.

@kostobog kostobog force-pushed the feature/59-implement-simple-fault-tree-cutsets branch from a037e6f to f242c40 Compare February 13, 2024 08:47
@kostobog kostobog force-pushed the feature/59-implement-simple-fault-tree-cutsets branch from 1bea759 to 3bc3d70 Compare February 22, 2024 13:48
@kostobog
Copy link
Collaborator Author

For now cutsets are fetched as the property FaultTree.faultEventScenarios.
JUnit tests added.

@kostobog kostobog merged commit 93f0b83 into main Feb 22, 2024
1 check passed
@blcham blcham deleted the feature/59-implement-simple-fault-tree-cutsets branch May 6, 2024 16:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants