Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: resolve assert_stmt and config_entry correctly #924

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2023

Conversation

NeverRaR
Copy link
Contributor

@NeverRaR NeverRaR commented Nov 28, 2023

1. Does this PR affect any open issues?(Y/N) and add issue references (e.g. "fix #123", "re #123".):

  • N
  • Y

fix #921

2. What is the scope of this PR (e.g. component or file name):

/kclvm/sema

3. Provide a description of the PR(e.g. more details, effects, motivations or doc link):

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Other

4. Are there any breaking changes?(Y/N) and describe the breaking changes(e.g. more details, motivations or doc link):

  • N
  • Y

5. Are there test cases for these changes?(Y/N) select and add more details, references or doc links:

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Benchmark (add benchmark stats below)
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • Other

@Peefy
Copy link
Contributor

Peefy commented Nov 28, 2023

@CodiumAI-Agent /review
@CodiumAI-Agent /improve

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Fixing the resolution of assert_stmt and config_entry in the KCL language
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR focuses on resolving the assert_stmt and config_entry correctly in the KCL language. The changes are mainly in the 'advanced_resolver' module and the test data. The PR also includes changes in the test data to reflect the new functionality.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Bug fix
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 4, because the PR involves changes in the core functionality of the language and requires a deep understanding of the language semantics and the resolver module.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and the changes are logically sound. However, it would be beneficial to add tests that specifically check the new functionality introduced in this PR. This will ensure that the changes work as expected and will prevent potential regressions in the future.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:
    • relevant file: kclvm/sema/src/advanced_resolver/mod.rs
      suggestion: Consider using more descriptive variable names for better code readability. For example, instead of 'x', 'y', 'z', use names that describe the purpose of the variables. [medium]
      relevant line: 37, 0, 37, 1, "x".to_string(), SymbolKind::Value,

    • relevant file: kclvm/sema/src/advanced_resolver/node.rs
      suggestion: The 'walk_assert_stmt' function has been modified to include the 'msg' field of 'assert_stmt'. It would be beneficial to add a comment explaining why this change was necessary, as it might not be immediately clear to other developers. [medium]
      relevant line: if let Some(msg) = &assert_stmt.msg {

    • relevant file: kclvm/sema/src/advanced_resolver/node.rs
      suggestion: The 'walk_config_entry' function has grown quite large and complex with this PR. Consider refactoring it into smaller, more manageable functions. This will improve code readability and maintainability. [important]
      relevant line: if let Some(key_symbol_ref) = self.expr(key) {

    • relevant file: kclvm/sema/src/advanced_resolver/node.rs
      suggestion: There seems to be a lot of nested conditionals in the 'walk_config_entry' function. Consider simplifying the logic or using a different approach to make the code easier to understand and maintain. [important]
      relevant line: if let Some(def_symbol_ref) = self

How to use

Instructions

Tag me in a comment '@CodiumAI-Agent' and add one of the following commands:
/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
/add_docs: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
/generate_labels: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
see the tools guide for more details.

To edit any configuration parameter from the configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value.
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Nov 28, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7016064366

  • 143 of 147 (97.28%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • 241 unchanged lines in 8 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-15.2%) to 72.625%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
kclvm/sema/src/advanced_resolver/node.rs 47 48 97.92%
kclvm/sema/src/core/symbol.rs 15 18 83.33%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
compiler_base/error/src/diagnostic/diagnostic_message.rs 3 0.0%
compiler_base/error/src/diagnostic/components.rs 6 0.0%
compiler_base/error/src/errors.rs 8 0.0%
compiler_base/error/src/diagnostic/diagnostic_handler.rs 11 0.0%
compiler_base/session/src/lib.rs 26 58.06%
compiler_base/error/src/diagnostic/mod.rs 27 0.0%
compiler_base/error/src/diagnostic/style.rs 41 0.0%
compiler_base/error/src/emitter.rs 119 0.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 7014765335: -15.2%
Covered Lines: 42217
Relevant Lines: 58130

💛 - Coveralls

@NeverRaR NeverRaR force-pushed the dev/boying/assert_stmt branch from 0f48061 to 3ae158f Compare November 28, 2023 06:09
@Peefy Peefy added the resolver label Nov 28, 2023
@Peefy Peefy added this to the v0.7.0 Release milestone Nov 28, 2023
@NeverRaR NeverRaR force-pushed the dev/boying/assert_stmt branch from 3ae158f to 5306672 Compare November 28, 2023 07:12
@NeverRaR NeverRaR force-pushed the dev/boying/assert_stmt branch from 5306672 to 86fd0c7 Compare November 28, 2023 08:27
Copy link
Contributor

@Peefy Peefy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Peefy Peefy merged commit 85d93a8 into kcl-lang:main Nov 28, 2023
11 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 28, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement] Symbol definition for the string interpolation in the assert statement
4 participants