Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-xml from 2.15.2 to 2.15.3 #3000

Closed

Conversation

luis100
Copy link
Member

@luis100 luis100 commented Nov 9, 2023

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-xml from 2.15.2 to 2.15.3.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a month ago, on 2023-10-13.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

…from 2.15.2 to 2.15.3

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-xml from 2.15.2 to 2.15.3.

See this package in Maven Repository:
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat/jackson-dataformat-xml/

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/luis100/project/d3ada05e-051e-43be-8c3f-b5ae9e54fc0f?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
@hmiguim hmiguim closed this Nov 9, 2023
@hmiguim hmiguim deleted the snyk-upgrade-bcb6a06fc6f5bc8b70a7af957dbd5590 branch November 9, 2023 12:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants