Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Remove explicit arg that enables litelinks' use of openssl #127

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2023

Conversation

njhill
Copy link
Member

@njhill njhill commented Nov 17, 2023

This won't change current behaviour since the default is to use netty's openssl-based TLS implementation anyhow. But it will allow overriding to use the native jdk TLS impl when needed.

Copy link
Member

@ckadner ckadner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@kserve-oss-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ckadner, njhill

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

This won't change current behaviour since the default is to use netty's openssl-based TLS implementation anyhow. But it will allow overriding to use the native jdk TLS impl when needed.

Signed-off-by: Nick Hill <[email protected]>
@ckadner ckadner added the lgtm label Nov 22, 2023
@kserve kserve deleted a comment from kserve-oss-bot Nov 22, 2023
@ckadner ckadner added this to the v0.11.2 milestone Nov 22, 2023
@ckadner ckadner merged commit 8b58bf0 into main Nov 22, 2023
6 of 7 checks passed
@njhill njhill deleted the rm-use-jdk-tls-arg branch November 22, 2023 23:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants