Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[GSoC] Provide a PyTorch MNIST Example for Push-based Metrics Collection #2437

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Electronic-Waste
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:

Provide a Pytorch MNIST example for push-based metrics collection.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Checklist:

  • Docs included if any changes are user facing

Signed-off-by: Electronic-Waste <[email protected]>
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign andreyvelich for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@tenzen-y
Copy link
Member

@Electronic-Waste Could we implement CI powered by papermill first in a separate PR?

@Electronic-Waste
Copy link
Member Author

It seems that #2417 mentioned it and has already been taken by someone. I'll ask the assignee about the progess. And if he doesn't have time, I would be glad to take it :)

Please let me know your thoughts. cc @tenzen-y @andreyvelich

@tenzen-y
Copy link
Member

It seems that #2417 mentioned it and has already been taken by someone. I'll ask the assignee about the progess. And if he doesn't have time, I would be glad to take it :)

Please let me know your thoughts. cc @tenzen-y @andreyvelich

As Andrey mentioned in the issue, we are working on it at the traininig-operator, first.
So, let us come back here after the papermill implementation is completed in the training operator.

@Electronic-Waste
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah, I see! I'm looking forward to enhance my understanding of Training-Operator through this issue :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants