Bpftool sync 2024-01-29 #130
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Both commit 91051f003948 ("tcp: Dump bound-only sockets in inet_diag.")
and commit 985b8ea9ec7e ("bpf, docs: Fix bpf_redirect_peer header doc")
missed the tooling header sync. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
At the moment we don't store cookie for perf_event probes, while we do that for the rest of the probes. Adding cookie fields to struct bpf_link_info perf event probe records: perf_event.uprobe perf_event.kprobe perf_event.tracepoint perf_event.perf_event And the code to store that in bpf_link_info struct. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Acked-by: Song Liu <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Storing cookies in kprobe_multi bpf_link_info data. The cookies field is optional and if provided it needs to be an array of __u64 with kprobe_multi.count length. Acked-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Acked-by: Song Liu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
The error path frees wrong array, it should be ref_ctr_offsets. Acked-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <[email protected]> Fixes: a7795698f8b6 ("bpftool: Add support to display uprobe_multi links") Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Acked-by: Song Liu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Displaying cookie for perf event link probes, in plain mode:
# bpftool link
17: perf_event prog 90
kprobe ffffffff82b1c2b0 bpf_fentry_test1 cookie 3735928559
18: perf_event prog 90
kretprobe ffffffff82b1c2b0 bpf_fentry_test1 cookie 3735928559
20: perf_event prog 92
tracepoint sched_switch cookie 3735928559
21: perf_event prog 93
event software:page-faults cookie 3735928559
22: perf_event prog 91
uprobe /proc/self/exe+0xd703c cookie 3735928559
And in json mode:
# bpftool link -j | jq
{
"id": 30,
"type": "perf_event",
"prog_id": 160,
"retprobe": false,
"addr": 18446744071607272112,
"func": "bpf_fentry_test1",
"offset": 0,
"missed": 0,
"cookie": 3735928559
}
{
"id": 33,
"type": "perf_event",
"prog_id": 162,
"tracepoint": "sched_switch",
"cookie": 3735928559
}
{
"id": 34,
"type": "perf_event",
"prog_id": 163,
"event_type": "software",
"event_config": "page-faults",
"cookie": 3735928559
}
{
"id": 35,
"type": "perf_event",
"prog_id": 161,
"retprobe": false,
"file": "/proc/self/exe",
"offset": 880700,
"cookie": 3735928559
}
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Song Liu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Displaying cookies for kprobe multi link, in plain mode:
# bpftool link
...
1397: kprobe_multi prog 47532
kretprobe.multi func_cnt 3
addr cookie func [module]
ffffffff82b370c0 3 bpf_fentry_test1
ffffffff82b39780 1 bpf_fentry_test2
ffffffff82b397a0 2 bpf_fentry_test3
And in json mode:
# bpftool link -j | jq
...
{
"id": 1397,
"type": "kprobe_multi",
"prog_id": 47532,
"retprobe": true,
"func_cnt": 3,
"missed": 0,
"funcs": [
{
"addr": 18446744071607382208,
"func": "bpf_fentry_test1",
"module": null,
"cookie": 3
},
{
"addr": 18446744071607392128,
"func": "bpf_fentry_test2",
"module": null,
"cookie": 1
},
{
"addr": 18446744071607392160,
"func": "bpf_fentry_test3",
"module": null,
"cookie": 2
}
]
}
Cookie is attached to specific address, and because we sort addresses
before printing, we need to sort cookies the same way, hence adding
the struct addr_cookie to keep and sort them together.
Also adding missing dd.sym_count check to show_kprobe_multi_json.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Song Liu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Include btf object id (btf_obj_id) in bpf_map_info so that tools (ex: bpftools struct_ops dump) know the correct btf from the kernel to look up type information of struct_ops types. Since struct_ops types can be defined and registered in a module. The type information of a struct_ops type are defined in the btf of the module defining it. The userspace tools need to know which btf is for the module defining a struct_ops type. Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Pass the fd of a btf from the userspace to the bpf() syscall, and then convert the fd into a btf. The btf is generated from the module that defines the target BPF struct_ops type. In order to inform the kernel about the module that defines the target struct_ops type, the userspace program needs to provide a btf fd for the respective module's btf. This btf contains essential information on the types defined within the module, including the target struct_ops type. A btf fd must be provided to the kernel for struct_ops maps and for the bpf programs attached to those maps. In the case of the bpf programs, the attach_btf_obj_fd parameter is passed as part of the bpf_attr and is converted into a btf. This btf is then stored in the prog->aux->attach_btf field. Here, it just let the verifier access attach_btf directly. In the case of struct_ops maps, a btf fd is passed as value_type_btf_obj_fd of bpf_attr. The bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc() function converts the fd to a btf and stores it as st_map->btf. A flag BPF_F_VTYPE_BTF_OBJ_FD is added for map_flags to indicate that the value of value_type_btf_obj_fd is set. Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Add new kind of BPF kernel object, BPF token. BPF token is meant to
allow delegating privileged BPF functionality, like loading a BPF
program or creating a BPF map, from privileged process to a *trusted*
unprivileged process, all while having a good amount of control over which
privileged operations could be performed using provided BPF token.
This is achieved through mounting BPF FS instance with extra delegation
mount options, which determine what operations are delegatable, and also
constraining it to the owning user namespace (as mentioned in the
previous patch).
BPF token itself is just a derivative from BPF FS and can be created
through a new bpf() syscall command, BPF_TOKEN_CREATE, which accepts BPF
FS FD, which can be attained through open() API by opening BPF FS mount
point. Currently, BPF token "inherits" delegated command, map types,
prog type, and attach type bit sets from BPF FS as is. In the future,
having an BPF token as a separate object with its own FD, we can allow
to further restrict BPF token's allowable set of things either at the
creation time or after the fact, allowing the process to guard itself
further from unintentionally trying to load undesired kind of BPF
programs. But for now we keep things simple and just copy bit sets as is.
When BPF token is created from BPF FS mount, we take reference to the
BPF super block's owning user namespace, and then use that namespace for
checking all the {CAP_BPF, CAP_PERFMON, CAP_NET_ADMIN, CAP_SYS_ADMIN}
capabilities that are normally only checked against init userns (using
capable()), but now we check them using ns_capable() instead (if BPF
token is provided). See bpf_token_capable() for details.
Such setup means that BPF token in itself is not sufficient to grant BPF
functionality. User namespaced process has to *also* have necessary
combination of capabilities inside that user namespace. So while
previously CAP_BPF was useless when granted within user namespace, now
it gains a meaning and allows container managers and sys admins to have
a flexible control over which processes can and need to use BPF
functionality within the user namespace (i.e., container in practice).
And BPF FS delegation mount options and derived BPF tokens serve as
a per-container "flag" to grant overall ability to use bpf() (plus further
restrict on which parts of bpf() syscalls are treated as namespaced).
Note also, BPF_TOKEN_CREATE command itself requires ns_capable(CAP_BPF)
within the BPF FS owning user namespace, rounding up the ns_capable()
story of BPF token. Also creating BPF token in init user namespace is
currently not supported, given BPF token doesn't have any effect in init
user namespace anyways.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Allow providing token_fd for BPF_MAP_CREATE command to allow controlled BPF map creation from unprivileged process through delegated BPF token. New BPF_F_TOKEN_FD flag is added to specify together with BPF token FD for BPF_MAP_CREATE command. Wire through a set of allowed BPF map types to BPF token, derived from BPF FS at BPF token creation time. This, in combination with allowed_cmds allows to create a narrowly-focused BPF token (controlled by privileged agent) with a restrictive set of BPF maps that application can attempt to create. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Accept BPF token FD in BPF_BTF_LOAD command to allow BTF data loading through delegated BPF token. BPF_F_TOKEN_FD flag has to be specified when passing BPF token FD. Given BPF_BTF_LOAD command didn't have flags field before, we also add btf_flags field. BTF loading is a pretty straightforward operation, so as long as BPF token is created with allow_cmds granting BPF_BTF_LOAD command, kernel proceeds to parsing BTF data and creating BTF object. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Add basic support of BPF token to BPF_PROG_LOAD. BPF_F_TOKEN_FD flag should be set in prog_flags field when providing prog_token_fd. Wire through a set of allowed BPF program types and attach types, derived from BPF FS at BPF token creation time. Then make sure we perform bpf_token_capable() checks everywhere where it's relevant. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Pull latest libbpf from mirror. Libbpf version: 1.4.0 Libbpf commit: fad5d9138196413cc485dd713f33ea5888d98ad8 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <[email protected]>
There exists the following warning when building bpftool:
CC prog.o
prog.c: In function ‘profile_open_perf_events’:
prog.c:2301:24: warning: ‘calloc’ sizes specified with ‘sizeof’ in the earlier argument and not in the later argument [-Wcalloc-transposed-args]
2301 | sizeof(int), obj->rodata->num_cpu * obj->rodata->num_metric);
| ^~~
prog.c:2301:24: note: earlier argument should specify number of elements, later size of each element
Tested with the latest upstream GCC which contains a new warning option
-Wcalloc-transposed-args. The first argument to calloc is documented to
be number of elements in array, while the second argument is size of each
element, just switch the first and second arguments of calloc() to silence
the build warning, compile tested only.
Fixes: 47c09d6a9f67 ("bpftool: Introduce "prog profile" command")
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Syncing latest bpftool commits from kernel repository. Baseline bpf-next commit: 98e20e5e13d2811898921f999288be7151a11954 Checkpoint bpf-next commit: c8632acf193beac64bbdaebef013368c480bf74f Baseline bpf commit: 7c5e046bdcb2513f9decb3765d8bf92d604279cf Checkpoint bpf commit: 0a5bd0ffe790511d802e7f40898429a89e2487df Andrii Nakryiko (4): bpf: Introduce BPF token object bpf: Add BPF token support to BPF_MAP_CREATE command bpf: Add BPF token support to BPF_BTF_LOAD command bpf: Add BPF token support to BPF_PROG_LOAD command Daniel Borkmann (1): bpf: Sync uapi bpf.h header for the tooling infra Jiri Olsa (5): bpf: Add cookie to perf_event bpf_link_info records bpf: Store cookies in kprobe_multi bpf_link_info data bpftool: Fix wrong free call in do_show_link bpftool: Display cookie for perf event link probes bpftool: Display cookie for kprobe multi link Kui-Feng Lee (2): bpf: pass btf object id in bpf_map_info. bpf: pass attached BTF to the bpf_struct_ops subsystem Tiezhu Yang (1): bpftool: Silence build warning about calloc() include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- src/link.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- src/prog.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull latest libbpf from mirror and sync bpftool repo with kernel, up to the commits used for libbpf sync. This is an automatic update performed by calling the sync script from this repo: