Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reapply 8644 on 9260 #9312

Closed

Conversation

aakselrod
Copy link
Contributor

@aakselrod aakselrod commented Nov 27, 2024

This is a rebase of #9242 on #9260 to see how they work together. Note that the postgres tests still have a chance of failing (generally with a failing blockchain sync) because btcsuite/btcwallet#967 isn't yet included.

yyforyongyu and others added 30 commits November 25, 2024 13:49
Also updated the loggings. This new state will be used in the following
commit.
This prepares the following commit where we now let the fee bumpr
decides whether to broadcast immediately or not.
This commit changes how inputs are handled upon receiving a bump result.
Previously the inputs are taken from the `BumpResult.Tx`, which is now
instead being handled locally as we will remember the input set when
sending the bump request, and handle this input set when a result is
received.
This commit adds a new method `handleInitialBroadcast` to handle the
initial broadcast. Previously we'd broadcast immediately inside
`Broadcast`, which soon will not work after the `blockbeat` is
implemented as the action to publish is now always triggered by a new
block. Meanwhile, we still keep the option to bypass the block trigger
so users can broadcast immediately by setting `Immediate` to true.
Previously in `markInputFailed`, we'd remove all inputs under the same
group via `removeExclusiveGroup`. This is wrong as when the current
sweep fails for this input, it shouldn't affect other inputs.
Also updated `handlePendingSweepsReq` to skip immature inputs so the
returned results are the same as those in pre-0.18.0.
With the combination of the following commit we can have a more granular
control over the bump result when handling it in the sweeper.
After previous commit, it should be clear that the tx may be failed to
created in a `TxFailed` event. We now make sure to catch it to avoid
panic.
This commit inits the package `chainio` and defines the interface
`Blockbeat` and `Consumer`. The `Consumer` must be implemented by other
subsystems if it requires block epoch subscription.
In this commit, a minimal implementation of `Blockbeat` is added to
synchronize block heights, which will be used in `ChainArb`, `Sweeper`,
and `TxPublisher` so blocks are processed sequentially among them.
This commit adds two methods to handle dispatching beats. These are
exported methods so other systems can send beats to their managed
subinstances.
This commit adds a blockbeat dispatcher which handles sending new blocks
to all subscribed consumers.
This commit implements `Consumer` on `TxPublisher`, `UtxoSweeper`,
`ChainArbitrator` and `ChannelArbitrator`.
This commit removes the independent block subscriptions in `UtxoSweeper`
and `TxPublisher`. These subsystems now listen to the `BlockbeatChan`
for new blocks.
This commit removes the hack introduced in lightningnetwork#4851. Previously we had this
issue because the chain notifier was stopped before the sweeper, which
was changed a while back and we now always stop the chain notifier last.
In addition, since we no longer subscribe to the block epoch chan
directly, this issue can no longer happen.
The sweeper can handle the waiting so there's no need to wait for blocks
inside the resolvers. By offering the inputs prior to their mature
heights also guarantees the inputs with the same deadline are
aggregated.
This commit removes the block subscriptions used in `ChainArbitrator`
and replaced them with the blockbeat managed by `BlockbeatDispatcher`.
This commit removes the block subscriptions used in `ChannelArbitrator`,
replaced them with the blockbeat managed by `BlockbeatDispatcher`.
This `immediate` flag was added as a hack so during a restart, the
pending resolvers would offer the inputs to the sweeper and ask it to
sweep them immediately. This is no longer need due to `blockbeat`, as
now during restart, a block is always sent to all subsystems via the
flow `ChainArb` -> `ChannelArb` -> resolvers -> sweeper. Thus, when
there are pending inputs offered, they will be processed by the sweeper
immediately.
To avoid calling GetBestBlock again.
This is needed so the consumers have an initial state about the current
block.
In this commit we start to break up the starting process into smaller
pieces, which is needed in the following commit to initialize blockbeat
consumers.
Refactor the `Start` method to fix the linter error:
```
contractcourt/chain_arbitrator.go:568: Function 'Start' is too long (242 > 200) (funlen)
```
yyforyongyu and others added 26 commits November 26, 2024 19:40
Also removed the duplicate test cases.
To make the CI indicative, we now starting tracking the flaky tests
found when running on Windows. As a starting point, rather than ignore
the windows CI entirely, we now identify there are cases where lnd can
be buggy when running in windows.

We should fix the tests in the future, otherwise the windows build
should be deleted.
Most of the time we only need to fund the node with given number of
UTXOs without concerning the amount, so we add the more efficient
funding method as it mines a single block in the end.
To make this itest work reliably with multiple parallel SQL
transactions, we need to count both the settle and final HTLC
events. Otherwise, sometimes the final events from earlier
forwards are counted before the forward events from later
forwards, causing a miscount of the settle events. If we
expect both the settle and final event for each forward,
we don't miscount.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
  • llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@aakselrod aakselrod mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2024
8 tasks
@aakselrod
Copy link
Contributor Author

I submitted a PR to master on accident, will resubmit

@aakselrod aakselrod closed this Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants