-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add check for valid range on buffers #24
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Protects crashes on reading and writing of buffer if range is accessed beyond buffer size.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is it going out of bounds in the first place?
BOOL hasValidRange = buffer.length >= offset + 4; | ||
if (hasValidRange) { | ||
[buffer replaceBytesInRange:NSMakeRange(offset, 4) withBytes:&value]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need proper error handling if we're going to do this, otherwise consumers will not know why their data is not what they expect.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we do not have enough information from JIRA to understand what core cause is on this.
I have changes locally for adding proper error handling mostly done, but it will alter most of the public API calls to have error
properties, would we be ok with that change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We may not have information from JIRA, but we only have a few places where we adjust the buffer and its size.
In other words, the symptom is we are writing a value outside of the range of a buffer. The root issue is why are we providing a bad buffer in the first place?
I think there is an issue in our file expansion code.
re: error handling -- I think that's fine. It could pollute our internal code though, so we may just want to use try-catches internally.
Protects crashes on reading and writing
of buffer if range is accessed beyond
buffer size.