Pipeline: Add lecture chat pipeline connection
#173
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several enhancements to the lecture chat functionality within the application. It includes the addition of a new data transfer object ( Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
app/domain/status/lecture_chat_status_update_dto.py (2)
4-5: Consider adding field validation for the result field.If the
resultfield has specific format requirements or constraints, consider adding Pydantic field validators.+from pydantic import validator + class LectureChatStatusUpdateDTO(StatusUpdateDTO): result: str + + @validator('result') + def validate_result(cls, v: str) -> str: + if not v.strip(): + raise ValueError("Result cannot be empty or whitespace") + return v
2-3: Remove extra blank line.There are two consecutive blank lines between the import statement and class definition. One blank line is sufficient according to PEP 8.
from app.domain.status.status_update_dto import StatusUpdateDTO - class LectureChatStatusUpdateDTO(StatusUpdateDTO):app/vector_database/lecture_schema.py (1)
Line range hint
1-116: Consider documenting language handling strategy.The addition of COURSE_LANGUAGE suggests language-specific handling in the lecture chat system. Consider documenting:
- How language preferences affect the lecture chat pipeline
- Whether any language-specific processing or validation is needed
- Default language handling when the property is not set
app/web/routers/pipelines.py (3)
136-140: Consider more specific variant matchingThe current variant matching could accidentally match unintended variants. Consider using an explicit enum or constant for variant names.
+from enum import Enum + +class LectureChatVariant(str, Enum): + DEFAULT = "default" + REFERENCE = "lecture_chat_pipeline_reference_impl" + match variant: - case "default" | "lecture_chat_pipeline_reference_impl": + case LectureChatVariant.DEFAULT | LectureChatVariant.REFERENCE: pipeline = LectureChatPipeline(callback=callback) case _: raise ValueError(f"Unknown variant: {variant}")
129-129: Add type hints to function parametersConsider adding type hints to improve code maintainability and IDE support.
-def run_lecture_chat_pipeline_worker(dto, variant): +def run_lecture_chat_pipeline_worker(dto: LectureChatPipelineExecutionDTO, variant: str):
269-276: Enhance variant descriptionConsider providing a more detailed description that explains the purpose and capabilities of the lecture chat variant.
case "LECTURE_CHAT": return [ FeatureDTO( id="default", name="Default Variant", - description="Default lecture chat variant.", + description="Default lecture chat variant for processing and responding to lecture-related queries and discussions.", ) ]app/web/status/status_update.py (2)
295-301: Consider adding more granular stages for better progress tracking.The current implementation only has a single "Thinking" stage with 30% weight. Other chat callbacks in the codebase have multiple stages for better progress tracking. Consider adding more stages to match the granularity of similar callbacks, such as:
- Initial processing/context loading
- Response generation
- Response refinement
This would provide better visibility into the pipeline's progress and align with the patterns seen in
TextExerciseChatCallbackandExerciseChatCallback.
305-305: Consider removing explicit empty result initialization.The explicit initialization of
result=""might be unnecessary as the DTO should handle default values. Other callback implementations don't set an initial result value.- LectureChatStatusUpdateDTO(stages=stages, result=""), + LectureChatStatusUpdateDTO(stages=stages),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
app/domain/status/lecture_chat_status_update_dto.py(1 hunks)app/pipeline/chat/lecture_chat_pipeline.py(3 hunks)app/vector_database/lecture_schema.py(2 hunks)app/web/routers/pipelines.py(4 hunks)app/web/status/status_update.py(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
app/vector_database/lecture_schema.py (1)
71-76: Verify migration strategy for existing collections.
The COURSE_LANGUAGE property is correctly defined, but please ensure:
- Existing collections are migrated to include this new property
- The application code handles cases where this property might be missing in older documents
Let's verify the usage and migration needs:
app/pipeline/chat/lecture_chat_pipeline.py (3)
28-28: LGTM: Clean callback integration
The import statement and class attribute for LectureChatCallback are well-structured with proper type annotations.
Also applies to: 59-59
61-73: LGTM: Clean constructor implementation
The constructor properly initializes the callback and maintains the parent class initialization.
66-66: Verify GPT model version upgrade implications
The GPT version has been upgraded from 3.5 to 4.5, which could impact:
- Response quality
- API costs
- Performance characteristics
✅ Verification successful
Let's examine the actual usage and configurations to better understand the implications.
GPT version upgrade is consistent with system requirements
The change to GPT version 4.5 in lecture_chat_pipeline.py is appropriate and verified because:
- The README explicitly states that "most existing pipelines in Pyris require a model with a
gpt_version_equivalentof 4.5 or higher" - Other chat-related pipelines (course_chat, code_feedback, exercise_chat) also require version 4.5
- The configuration file shows proper cost structures and capabilities for 4.5 models (GPT 4 Omni)
- The upgrade aligns with the system's documented model requirements and capabilities
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other GPT version configurations to ensure consistency
rg -l "gpt_version_equivalent.*3\.5"
# Look for any cost-related configurations
rg -l "cost|pricing|budget"
# Check for performance-related configurations
rg -l "timeout|performance|latency"
Length of output: 908
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual GPT version configurations and their context
rg "gpt_version_equivalent" -B 2 -A 2
# Check cost-related configurations specifically in config files
cat llm_config.example.yml
# Look for any performance/timeout settings that might be model-specific
rg "timeout.*gpt|performance.*gpt" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 12513
app/web/routers/pipelines.py (4)
14-22: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized
The new imports for lecture chat functionality follow the established pattern and maintain consistency with the existing codebase structure.
167-174: LGTM: Endpoint implementation follows established patterns
The lecture chat endpoint is well-implemented, following the same patterns as other pipeline endpoints:
- Proper route definition with variant parameter
- Token validation dependency
- Asynchronous execution using threading
142-143:
Fix incorrect error message in logs
The error message refers to "exercise chat pipeline" instead of "lecture chat pipeline".
- logger.error(f"Error preparing exercise chat pipeline: {e}")
+ logger.error(f"Error preparing lecture chat pipeline: {e}")Likely invalid or redundant comment.
131-135: Verify status update integration
Let's verify that the LectureChatCallback is properly integrated with the status update system.
✅ Verification successful
Status update integration is properly implemented
The LectureChatCallback is correctly integrated with the status update system:
- It inherits from the abstract StatusCallback base class
- Properly initializes the status update URL, stages, and callback mechanisms
- Inherits all necessary status update methods (in_progress, done, error, skip)
- Uses the correct LectureChatStatusUpdateDTO for status updates
- Follows the same pattern as other chat callbacks in the system
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify LectureChatCallback implementation and integration
# Check if LectureChatCallback properly extends StatusCallback
ast-grep --pattern 'class LectureChatCallback extends StatusCallback {
$$$
}'
# Check for consistent status update method implementations
rg -A 2 'def (on_start|on_complete|on_error)' app/web/status/status_update.py
Length of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to verify the callback implementation
# Search for LectureChatCallback class definition
rg -A 10 "class LectureChatCallback"
# Look for status update related methods in the callback
rg -A 3 "def (on_start|on_complete|on_error)" --type py
# Check imports to verify inheritance
rg "from.*StatusCallback.*import|import.*StatusCallback" --type py
# Find any usage of status update methods
rg "self\.(on_start|on_complete|on_error)" --type py
Length of output: 1396
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the StatusCallback base class and its implementation
# Find the StatusCallback base class definition and methods
rg -A 15 "class StatusCallback" --type py
# Check the complete LectureChatCallback implementation
cat app/web/status/status_update.py
Length of output: 11528
app/web/status/status_update.py (1)
15-17: LGTM: Import statement is properly structured.
The import for LectureChatStatusUpdateDTO follows the established pattern and is correctly placed with other similar DTO imports.
| class LectureChatStatusUpdateDTO(StatusUpdateDTO): | ||
| result: str |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add documentation to explain the DTO's purpose and field usage.
The class and its result field lack documentation. Add docstrings to improve code maintainability and clarity.
class LectureChatStatusUpdateDTO(StatusUpdateDTO):
+ """Data Transfer Object for lecture chat status updates.
+
+ This DTO extends the base StatusUpdateDTO to include the result of lecture chat
+ pipeline operations, facilitating communication between Artemis and the lecture
+ chat system.
+ """
+
result: str
+ """The result message or status of the lecture chat pipeline operation."""📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| class LectureChatStatusUpdateDTO(StatusUpdateDTO): | |
| result: str | |
| class LectureChatStatusUpdateDTO(StatusUpdateDTO): | |
| """Data Transfer Object for lecture chat status updates. | |
| This DTO extends the base StatusUpdateDTO to include the result of lecture chat | |
| pipeline operations, facilitating communication between Artemis and the lecture | |
| chat system. | |
| """ | |
| result: str | |
| """The result message or status of the lecture chat pipeline operation.""" |
| # collection.config.add_property( | ||
| # Property( | ||
| # name=LectureSchema.COURSE_LANGUAGE.value, | ||
| # description="The language of the COURSE", | ||
| # data_type=DataType.TEXT, | ||
| # index_searchable=False, | ||
| # ) | ||
| # ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just as code rabbit pointed out, do we still need this? As this condition is only triggered when the LectureSchema.COLLECTION_NAME exists in the collection, you can be sure that the returned collection != null. Do you want to overwrite it or not?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, we changed the code and now it should be better integrated
| def run_lecture_chat_pipeline_worker(dto, variant): | ||
| try: | ||
| callback = LectureChatCallback( | ||
| run_id=dto.settings.authentication_token, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Might not be your code, but it seems a bit sketchy that something as confidential as a authentication token is used for a less-confidential context such as a random callback id 😅 Is it supposed to be like this?
app/web/routers/pipelines.py
Outdated
| def run_lecture_chat_pipeline(variant: str, dto: LectureChatPipelineExecutionDTO): | ||
| thread = Thread(target=run_lecture_chat_pipeline_worker, args=(dto, variant)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The order of arguments is flipped in this POST endpoint: First variant, second dto. In the internal methods you use the flipped order. I'd be happy if you could decide and align to one way of doing it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you, we implemented it now :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
app/web/routers/pipelines.py (2)
142-143: Consider security implications of error logging.The current implementation logs full stack traces which might expose sensitive information in production. Consider:
- Limiting stack trace logging to development/staging environments
- Sanitizing sensitive information from error messages
Also applies to: 150-151
173-174: Consider thread lifecycle management.The current implementation starts threads but doesn't track their lifecycle. Consider:
- Using a thread pool to manage concurrent executions
- Implementing a cleanup mechanism for completed threads
- Adding timeout handling for long-running operations
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
app/vector_database/lecture_schema.py(2 hunks)app/web/routers/pipelines.py(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/vector_database/lecture_schema.py
🔇 Additional comments (3)
app/web/routers/pipelines.py (3)
14-22: LGTM!
The imports are well-organized and follow the existing pattern in the codebase.
132-132: Consider using a dedicated run ID instead of authentication token.
As noted in a previous review, using an authentication token as a run ID might not be the best practice from a security perspective.
269-276: LGTM!
The feature variant implementation follows the established pattern and is consistent with other features.
| @@ -121,6 +126,32 @@ def run_text_exercise_chat_pipeline_worker(dto, variant): | |||
| callback.error("Fatal error.", exception=e) | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| def run_lecture_chat_pipeline_worker(variant, dto): | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Align argument order with other worker functions.
For consistency with other worker functions (e.g., run_course_chat_pipeline_worker, run_text_exercise_chat_pipeline_worker), consider changing the argument order to (dto, variant).
-def run_lecture_chat_pipeline_worker(variant, dto):
+def run_lecture_chat_pipeline_worker(dto, variant):📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| def run_lecture_chat_pipeline_worker(variant, dto): | |
| def run_lecture_chat_pipeline_worker(dto, variant): |
| dependencies=[Depends(TokenValidator())], | ||
| ) | ||
| def run_lecture_chat_pipeline(variant: str, dto: LectureChatPipelineExecutionDTO): | ||
| thread = Thread(target=run_lecture_chat_pipeline_worker, args=(variant, dto)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix argument order in Thread creation.
The arguments passed to the worker function are in reverse order compared to the worker's parameter order. This will cause the wrong values to be passed to the function.
- thread = Thread(target=run_lecture_chat_pipeline_worker, args=(variant, dto))
+ thread = Thread(target=run_lecture_chat_pipeline_worker, args=(dto, variant))📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| thread = Thread(target=run_lecture_chat_pipeline_worker, args=(variant, dto)) | |
| thread = Thread(target=run_lecture_chat_pipeline_worker, args=(dto, variant)) |
Add a POST route to connect the lecture chat pipeline, enabling Artemis to send messages directly into the lecture chat system.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
LectureChatStatusUpdateDTOclass for improved status updates in lecture chat scenarios.LectureChatCallbackclass to enhance handling of status updates during lecture chat processing./lecture-chat/{variant}/runfor executing the lecture chat pipeline.Enhancements
LectureChatPipelineto integrate a callback mechanism for better response management.COURSE_LANGUAGEproperty to the lecture schema for enhanced data organization.Bug Fixes