-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move the ISIS SANS Interface Out of the Framework. #38047
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
👋 Hi, @cailafinn, Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch. |
There's not really any point in having SANS.sans everywhere. RE mantidproject#37952
The models test directory has been renamed to model_tests. This resulted in PyCharm being a little overzelous with what should be updated after this name change. RE mantidproject#37952
f9d1263
to
38a09aa
Compare
121a834
to
00e89ab
Compare
00e89ab
to
d932fe1
Compare
This is to try and get around a git renaming with uppercase to lowercase. RE mantidproject#37952
👋 Hi, @cailafinn, Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch. |
ac57930
to
7550476
Compare
👋 Hi, @cailafinn, Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch. |
1 similar comment
👋 Hi, @cailafinn, Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch. |
Description of work
Summary of work
Moves the main content of the ISIS SANS GUI out of the framework and into the
mantidqtinterfaces
package. This removes a lot of modules that cannot be run being available in themantid
package where Qt is not available.Fixes #37952
Further detail of work
The move required some changes to the packages, as there was code in the
gui_logic
that was relied upon by other elements in thesans
reduction package. This should now be fixed so the imports only occur one-way.To test:
loqdemo
in the training course data.Reviewer
Please comment on the points listed below (full description).
Your comments will be used as part of the gatekeeper process, so please comment clearly on what you have checked during your review. If changes are made to the PR during the review process then your final comment will be the most important for gatekeepers. In this comment you should make it clear why any earlier review is still valid, or confirm that all requested changes have been addressed.
Code Review
Functional Tests
Does everything look good? Mark the review as Approve. A member of
@mantidproject/gatekeepers
will take care of it.Gatekeeper
If you need to request changes to a PR then please add a comment and set the review status to "Request changes". This will stop the PR from showing up in the list for other gatekeepers.