Skip to content

LCA Results

mrvisscher edited this page Sep 30, 2024 · 2 revisions

Important

This wiki section is incomplete or outdated.

Please help us improve the wiki by reading our contributing guidelines.

Overview

Inventory

LCA overview results

Score matrix

Contribution Analysis

Differences between approaches

Activity Browser has two contribution analysis approaches available to assess results, Elementary Flow (EF) Contributions and Process contributions.

Before we discuss the different approaches, we introduce a small example for the production of 'steel':

steel production example

The amounts we use are:

activity product technosphere exchanges biosphere exchanges
coal production 10 kg coal 0.02 kg CH4
electricity production 10 kWh electricity 10 kg coal 10.808 kg CO2
steel production 10 kg steel 5 kWh electricity
5 kg coal
10 kg CO2
Note: These numbers are used for ease of understanding, not for realism.

To produce 1 kg of steel, we get a climate change impact of 1.6 kg CO2 eq with the 'IPCC 2021' impact category. In the way Brightway (and thus Activity Browser) calculate results, a contribution matrix is calculated with all impacts from all EFs and all activities. For the system and functional unit above, this would be:

coal prod. elec. prod. steel prod.
CO2 - 0.5404... 1
CH4 0.0596... - -

The contribution matrix show the dis-aggregated results for each individual biosphere flow for each activity.

EF contributions

If we take sum the rows to one row, we get the EF contributions (the contribution of all CO2 and CH4 impacts together). In the case above, the EF contributions are:

  • CO2: 1.5404... (96.3%)
  • CH4: 0.0596... (3.7%)

Process contributions

If we take the sum of the columns to one column, we get the process contributions (the contribution of all coal, electricity and steel production impacts together). In the case above, the process contributions are:

  • coal production: 0.0596... (3.7%)
  • electricity production: 0.5404... (62.5%)
  • steel production: 1 (33.8%)

To summarize, the difference between EF and process contributions is the direction the contribution matrix is summed.

Manipulating results

In this section we generalize a little bit for the different contribution approaches, we call the from part of the contributions (the EFs or activities above) entities.

There are several ways Activity Browser manipulates your results by default.

  • The results are sorted so that the largest (absolute) values are shown first
  • A cut-off of 5% is applied to group all entities with an impact below that value.
  • The contributions are normalized to the impact of that reference flow, meaning they are show as a percentage, counting up to 100%

These actions are taken to show you the most relevant results.

You can manually manipulate the contribution results in the next menu, which we explain bit by bit below. contributions cutoff

Cut-off

You can manually change the cut-off of the results in two ways, Relative or Top #. The Relative option shows contributions from entities of x% or higher. The Top # options shows contributions from the x entities that contribute the most (as absolute).

You can change the value of the cut-off in the menu shown below.

Compare

The Compare menu allows you to compare different dimensions of results. You can compare between:

  • Reference flows
  • Impact categories
  • Scenarios (only available in scenario LCA, see scenarios)

The compare mode defines what is shown in the figure.

Aggregation

The Aggregate by menu can be used to group results based on field names. As an example, EF contributions can be grouped on the name, for example to group all flows with the same name. Another example for process contributions can be grouped based on their reference product name.

Plot and Table

By default, Activity Browser shows a plot and a table. You can disable one of them if you want to focus on one of them.

Relative and Absolute

Finally, you can choose between Relative and Absolute results. The Relative results will sum to 100%, the Absolute results will sum to the impact score.

Sankey

The Sankey tab shows results from graph traversal. Graph traversal calculates results step-by-step for nodes (activites) in the graph (supply chain/product system).

Sankey configuration

In the Sankey tab, you can configure, you can set the Reference flow, Impact category and Scenario (only available in scenario LCA, see scenarios) to be shown. you can also set a cutoff and calculation depth setting.

The cutoff setting will stop traversing the supply chain once the impact is below the percentage specified. The calculation depth will stop traversing the supply chain once that number of calculations have been performed.

Sankey results

In the Sankey, the red arrows show the cumulative impact of the product flow (direct from that process and indirect from all upstream processes involved in producing that product), the boxes show the direct (process contribution) impact of that process.

Using the example above in the contribution analysis section, we show the sankey below. The process contribution results are also shown in the boxes below.

sankey example

Other Results tabs

The Monte Carlo and Senstivity Analysis tabs are explained on the Uncertainty page.

Scenarios