Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Draft] working on dcpo presentations #120

Draft
wants to merge 28 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jonsterling
Copy link
Contributor

This is a draft PR containing @Trebor-Huang's work on exploring dcpo presentations, roughly following Jung, Moshier, and Vickers. We will mark it as such when it is ready for review, but preliminary feedback is welcome along the way at any time.

@jonsterling jonsterling changed the title [Draft] workingon dcpo presentations [Draft] working on dcpo presentations Feb 24, 2023
where

Cover-set : 𝓤 ⊔ 𝓥 ⁺ ⊔ 𝓦 ⁺ ̇ -- This one has spurious assumptions
Cover-set = G → {I : 𝓥 ̇} → (I → G) → Ω 𝓦
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am wondering whether this is a workable way to formulate the set of covers in a univalent setting. In particular, I think we would need it to be a family of types rather than a family of propositions. But maybe there is some better formulation anyway.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are two powersets in the original definition. I changed the inner one but not the outer one, because I was not so sure about how the outer one is used.

@martinescardo
Copy link
Owner

Any progress with this?

@Trebor-Huang
Copy link

I'm about to come back to this as summer holiday is coming.

@martinescardo
Copy link
Owner

Is there an intention to continue this work?

@ayberkt
Copy link
Collaborator

ayberkt commented Apr 24, 2024

@jonsterling @Trebor-Huang Do you plan to finish this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants