-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Draft] working on dcpo presentations #120
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Only regularizing the formatting of the code we are adding; this file needs attention/cleanup in a separate PR.
where | ||
|
||
Cover-set : 𝓤 ⊔ 𝓥 ⁺ ⊔ 𝓦 ⁺ ̇ -- This one has spurious assumptions | ||
Cover-set = G → {I : 𝓥 ̇} → (I → G) → Ω 𝓦 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am wondering whether this is a workable way to formulate the set of covers in a univalent setting. In particular, I think we would need it to be a family of types rather than a family of propositions. But maybe there is some better formulation anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are two powersets in the original definition. I changed the inner one but not the outer one, because I was not so sure about how the outer one is used.
Any progress with this? |
I'm about to come back to this as summer holiday is coming. |
Is there an intention to continue this work? |
@jonsterling @Trebor-Huang Do you plan to finish this? |
This is a draft PR containing @Trebor-Huang's work on exploring dcpo presentations, roughly following Jung, Moshier, and Vickers. We will mark it as such when it is ready for review, but preliminary feedback is welcome along the way at any time.