-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 338
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RPC Records list filtering #3700
Merged
Merged
Changes from 16 commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
42235d2
add initial where building function and filters
mathemancer 6abb681
add more filtering functions
mathemancer a127f18
add debugging output about what query ran to response
mathemancer 08beaed
implement remaining filtering functions
mathemancer 6294458
add test for each leaf filter function
mathemancer 68ced5e
Merge branch 'develop' into records_list_filter
mathemancer b16958b
add composition test for filtering, fix composition
mathemancer 2a152b0
add more complex composition example
mathemancer 0380f32
fix records list test with new type
mathemancer 15c61d1
fix stupid syntax mistake :hankey: :hankey: :hankey:
mathemancer c90664e
Merge branch 'develop' into records_list_filter
mathemancer 1155d7f
change column_id -> attnum for conformity with other RPC functions
mathemancer 45490f9
add new classes to docs
mathemancer bb78a2e
update filtering logic as per convo with Sean
mathemancer 79631b0
generalize terminology to avoid 'filter' where appropriate
mathemancer 2cadd69
Merge branch 'develop' into records_list_filter
mathemancer 570c87b
use explicit type casting for json containment
mathemancer 8447a14
Merge branch 'develop' into records_list_filter
mathemancer File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know if we should be explicitly typecasting to
jsonb
here, as this would allow columns storing a json blob in a text column to be typecasted and return a result. However, if that is the intended behavior, it would be good to add typecasting tojson_array_contains
as well.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The main goal was to allow this to be used on both
json
andjsonb
. But, your point stands. I'll add typecasting tojson_array_contains
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That makes sense.