Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Meter provider api #39

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Oct 12, 2023
Merged

Meter provider api #39

merged 11 commits into from
Oct 12, 2023

Conversation

dnarula-mw
Copy link
Contributor

  • Creates the MeterProvider API class with methods "getMeter" and "setMeterProvider"
  • Creates the MeterProviderProxy for the API
  • Add a unit test for get and set meter provider

Copy link
Member

@duncanpo duncanpo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me know if you have any question about any comment.

sdk/metrics/+opentelemetry/+sdk/+metrics/MeterProvider.m Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
public:
MeterProviderProxy(nostd::shared_ptr<metrics_api::MeterProvider> mp) : CppMeterProvider(mp) {
REGISTER_METHOD(MeterProviderProxy, getMeter);
MeterProviderProxy(nostd::shared_ptr<metrics_api::MeterProvider> mp) : libmexclass::opentelemetry::MeterProviderProxy(mp), CppMeterProvider(mp) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Calling the base class constructor and assigning directly to CppMeterProvider is redundant. The base class constructor already assigns to CppMeterProvider. I think you can leave out CppMeterProvider(mp) here on this line

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Originally I left out the CppMeterProvider(mp) from this line, but after merging with Rick's code it caused a crash. I had to add it back in or else the "addMetricReader" would cause a crash. Should I find another way to fix that crash instead?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If it is causing a crash, we need to understand why. CppMeterProvider(mp) here should be completely redundant. I think we should remove it, find out if it is really crashing, and if so, determine why.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok I will look into this, thanks.

Copy link
Member

@duncanpo duncanpo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix these test issues in addition to my previous review.

test/tmetrics.m Outdated
function testGetSetMeterProvider(testCase)
% testGetSetMeterProvider: setting and getting global instance of MeterProvider
exporter = opentelemetry.exporters.otlp.OtlpHttpMetricExporter(...
"PreferredAggregationTemporality", "Delta");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think you need "Delta" temporality here. I would just call the exporter constructor with no input and use the default temporality.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For some reason after implementing all these changes and running the tests, all the tracer tests which are run after the metrics tests fail. I added the Delta temporality back in, and the tracer tests are now passing again. Do you know why that could be happening?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How did the tests fail? What are the error messages?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The resourceSpan error is unrelated. I think currently it is a sporadic error depending on the run. The reason why it is happening is that even when we do "clear mp" before readJsonResults, we are still not stopping the MeterProvider from regularly exporting. The MeterProvider mp contains a shared pointer that points to the cpp MeterProvider object. But that cpp MeterProvider object is also pointed to by the global MeterProvider with a shared pointer. As long as there is at least one shared pointer pointing to it, the cpp MeterProvider is not getting destroyed.
After the metric tests are completed and when the tracing tests are running, the collector is getting data from both metrics and tracing. Depending on the timing, the tracing tests sometimes pick up the metric results, and the metric results doesn't have the resourceSpan field.
So we need to figure out how to deal with this larger issue. But that can be after your PR gets accepted. I would recommend you can continue to remove the "delta" temporality. If the tests fail, we can ignore for now, and deal with it after.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok sounds good thanks. I deleted my earlier comment about the error with tcontextPropagation because that was just caused by a typo so that's fine.

I just confirmed by testing a few times that the resourceSpan error does seem to occur when the "delta" temporality is removed, and the error goes away when I add it back. I'm not sure what the connection is there, but I can still remove the "delta" temporality if you'd like.

test/tmetrics.m Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@duncanpo duncanpo merged commit cf7f8ec into metrics Oct 12, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants