Skip to content

docs: detailed use of get_justification in informal spec #42

docs: detailed use of get_justification in informal spec

docs: detailed use of get_justification in informal spec #42

Workflow file for this run

name: PR title
on:
pull_request:
types:
- opened
- reopened
- edited
- synchronize
jobs:
lint:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
statuses: write
pull-requests: write
steps:
- uses: amannn/action-semantic-pull-request@v5
id: lint_pr_title
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
- uses: marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment@v2
# When the previous steps fails, the workflow would stop. By adding this
# condition you can continue the execution with the populated error message.
if: always() && (steps.lint_pr_title.outputs.error_message != null)
with:
header: pr-title-lint-error
message: |
Hey there! 👋🏼
We require pull request titles to follow the [Conventional Commits specification](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted.
Examples of valid PR titles:
- feat(boojum): Expose more public methods
- fix(franklin-crypto): Correctly handle edge case
- ci: Add new workflow for linting
Details:
```
${{ steps.lint_pr_title.outputs.error_message }}
```
# Delete a previous comment when the issue has been resolved
- if: ${{ steps.lint_pr_title.outputs.error_message == null }}
uses: marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment@v2
with:
header: pr-title-lint-error
delete: true