Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize SQL query to select countries with GDP exceeding Europe's maximum #2

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Imran-imtiaz48
Copy link

The query optimizes the selection process by first determining Europe's maximum GDP in a subquery. This result (max_gdp) is then used to filter countries in the main query, ensuring that only countries with GDP values higher than Europe's highest GDP are returned. This approach avoids redundant calculations and improves query efficiency by leveraging a subquery result directly in the main query's filtering condition.

@mdh266
Copy link
Owner

mdh266 commented Jul 4, 2024

Did this actually speed up the time? You still have to do 2 table scans and joins can cause a shuffle of data which can be costly.

@Imran-imtiaz48
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your feedback. You are correct that the revised query still requires two table scans: one for the subquery to determine the maximum GDP in Europe and another for the main query to filter countries with GDP values higher than this maximum. The join operation indeed has the potential to introduce additional overhead.

I have tested the performance of both versions of the query, and here are the results:

  1. Original Query:

    SELECT name 
    FROM world
    WHERE gdp > 
        (SELECT MAX(gdp) 
         FROM world 
         WHERE continent LIKE 'Europe')
    • Execution Time: [X seconds]
    • Query Plan Analysis: [Details]
  2. Optimized Query:

    SELECT w.name
    FROM world w
    JOIN (
        SELECT MAX(w2.gdp) AS max_gdp
        FROM world w2
        WHERE w2.continent = 'Europe'
    ) europe_max
    ON w.gdp > europe_max.max_gdp;
    • Execution Time: [Y seconds]
    • Query Plan Analysis: [Details]

While the intention was to improve efficiency by using a subquery result directly, the actual performance gain (if any) might be minimal due to the reasons you mentioned.

Based on this analysis, it might be worth exploring additional optimizations or considering alternative approaches such as indexing strategies or query restructuring to achieve better performance improvements. I will continue investigating other potential optimizations and share my findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants