Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CV2-5193: fix sentry issue #2018

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024
Merged

CV2-5193: fix sentry issue #2018

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

melsawy
Copy link
Contributor

@melsawy melsawy commented Sep 3, 2024

Description

Fix sentry issue.

References: CV2-5193

How has this been tested?

Re-run automated tests.

Things to pay attention to during code review

Please describe parts of the change that require extra attention during code review, for example:

  • File FFFF, line LL: This refactoring does this and this. Is it consistent with how it’s implemented elsewhere?
  • Etc.

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have added unit and feature tests, if the PR implements a new feature or otherwise would benefit from additional testing
  • I have added regression tests, if the PR fixes a bug
  • I have added logging, exception reporting, and custom tracing with any additional information required for debugging
  • I considered secure coding practices when writing this code. Any security concerns are noted above.
  • I have commented my code in hard-to-understand areas, if any
  • I have made needed changes to the README
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • If I added a third party module, I included a rationale for doing so and followed our current guidelines

@melsawy melsawy merged commit f6eb4c0 into develop Sep 3, 2024
10 checks passed
@melsawy melsawy deleted the fix/CV2-5193-sentry-issue branch September 3, 2024 16:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants