fix: visual fixes

[emilyjablonski]

Pull Request Template

How Can This Be Tested/Reviewed?

Fixes two visual issues:

1. Alert boxes on both public and partners did not always have the right background color
2. If you're on the listings page, once the SiteHeader component drops down onto the next line (easier to see in Spanish), it covers the filter button

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have added QA notes to the issue with applicable URLs
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have reviewed the changes in a desktop view
• I have reviewed the changes in a mobile view
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
• I have assigned reviewers
• I have run yarn generate:client and/or created a migration if I made backend changes that require them
• My commit message(s) is/are polished, and any breaking changes are indicated in the message and are well-described
• Commits made across packages purposefully have the same commit message/version change, else are separated into different commits

Reviewer Notes:

Steps to review a PR:

• Read and understand the issue, and ensure the author has added QA notes
• Review the code itself from a style point of view
• Pull the changes down locally and test that the acceptance criteria is met
• Also review the acceptance criteria on the Netlify deploy preview (noting that these do not yet include any backend changes made in the PR)
• Either explicitly ask a clarifying question, request changes, or approve the PR if there are small remaining changes but the PR is otherwise good to go

On Merge:

If you have one commit and message, squash. If you need each message to be applied, rebase and merge.

[ColinBuyck]

LGTM once the conflicts are resolved just a question and flagging that it might be worth touching base with design (at a later date) since the current amount of links leaves longer languages like Spanish always in this view but I recognize that's not part of/introduced by this ticket