Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

github action documentation #505

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024
Merged

github action documentation #505

merged 12 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024

Conversation

pelikhan
Copy link
Member

@pelikhan pelikhan commented Jun 4, 2024

Document various new flags to support github actions

Caution

The square brackets around [string] for the --pull-request-comment option suggest that the argument is optional, but the default value "" is not provided in the code. Consider adding a default value or handling the case where the argument might be omitted. 😊 (packages/cli/src/cli.ts#L101)

Caution

Similarly, the square brackets around [string] for the --pull-request-description option indicate that the argument is optional, but there's no default value provided in the code. Make sure to provide a default value or handle the case where the argument might be omitted. 👍 (packages/cli/src/cli.ts#L107)

Caution

The check if (!filename) return file is added without any comment or explanation. It's important to document the reason for such a check to avoid confusion for future maintainers of the code. Consider adding a comment to explain why the filename check is necessary. 📝 (packages/core/src/file.ts#L27)

generated by genaiscript pr-review-commit

  • Updated documentation to include a new section on GitHub Actions, explaining how to integrate GenAIScript scripts into CI/CD workflows, manage secrets and environment variables, and cache LLM queries.
  • Added instructions for using GitHub Actions to add comments to pull requests, including updating descriptions, conversation comments, and review comments.
  • Introduced a new script pr-describe.genai.js for summarizing changes in a pull request.
  • Introduced a new script pr-review-commit.genai.js for reviewing the latest commit in a pull request.
  • Updated CLI commands to allow optional arguments for pull request comments and descriptions, with default script IDs.
  • Incremented the version of promptfoo dependency from ^0.60.0 to ^0.61.0 in CLI package.
  • Updated various dependencies across packages to newer versions.
  • Fixed a potential issue in resolveFileContent function by adding a check for the existence of filename before proceeding.
  • Added a description and keywords to the "Sharing scripts" documentation page.
  • Made minor formatting adjustments to YAML examples in the annotations documentation.

generated by genaiscript pr-describe

The provided GIT_DIFF indicates several updates and additions across documentation and code files. Here's a high-level review:

  • 📝 Documentation updates in automating-scripts.mdx enhance clarity on using GenAIScript with CI/CD pipelines, specifically GitHub Actions, including caching, annotations, and pull request integration.
  • 🛠️ The commands.md file shows updates to CLI options, improving user experience by clarifying the use of flags for pull request comments and descriptions.
  • 🌐 The index.mdx file reflects a minor update, linking the CLI usage to automation scenarios.
  • 🚀 The annotations.md file now includes a section on GitHub Pull Request Review Comments, which is a valuable addition for integrating annotations directly into code reviews.
  • 📦 Dependency updates in package.json files suggest maintenance and keeping up with the latest versions, which is good for security and performance.
  • 🛂 Code changes in TypeScript files (cli.ts and run.ts) seem to handle pull request comments and descriptions more robustly, with default values ensuring smoother operations.

Overall, the changes look good and aim to improve the user experience and integration with GitHub workflows. LGTM 🚀

No functional issues are apparent from the diff, and the TypeScript compiler should handle type checking. The updates seem to be well-aligned with best practices and do not introduce any obvious regressions or concerns.

generated by genaiscript pr-review

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ export async function resolveFileContent(
const { trace } = options || {}
const { filename } = file
if (file.content) return file

if (!filename) return file
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The variable adapter is declared but never used within the scope of the HTTPS_REGEX.test(filename) block. This could be an oversight or leftover from a refactor. Consider removing it if it's not needed, or ensure it's being used appropriately if it was intended for some functionality. 🤔

generated by genaiscript pr-review-commit

@pelikhan pelikhan marked this pull request as ready for review June 4, 2024 16:12
"-prc, --pull-request-comment <string>",
"create comment on a pull request."
"-prc, --pull-request-comment [string]",
"create comment on a pull request.", ""
)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similar to the --pull-request-comment option, the --pull-request-description option also has an unnecessary default value "". It would be cleaner to have --pull-request-description [string] without the default value. Keep it up! 👍

generated by genaiscript pr-review-commit

@@ -101,12 +101,12 @@ export async function cli() {
)
.option("-ocl, --out-changelog <string>", "output file for changelogs")
.option(
"-prc, --pull-request-comment <string>",
"create comment on a pull request."
"-prc, --pull-request-comment [string]",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The option for pull-request-description should not have a default value as it is now optional, indicated by the square brackets. Remove the default empty string to avoid confusion.

generated by genaiscript pr-review-commit

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 4, 2024

  • Updated documentation to include a new section on GitHub Actions, explaining how to integrate GenAIScript scripts into CI/CD workflows, manage secrets and environment variables, and cache LLM queries.
  • Added instructions for using GitHub Actions to add comments to pull requests, including updating descriptions, conversation comments, and review comments.
  • Introduced a new script pr-describe.genai.js for summarizing changes in a pull request.
  • Introduced a new script pr-review-commit.genai.js for reviewing the latest commit in a pull request.
  • Updated CLI commands to allow optional arguments for pull request comments and descriptions, with default script IDs.
  • Incremented the version of promptfoo dependency from ^0.60.0 to ^0.61.0 in CLI package.
  • Updated various dependencies across packages to newer versions.
  • Fixed a potential issue in resolveFileContent function by adding a check for the existence of filename before proceeding.
  • Added a description and keywords to the "Sharing scripts" documentation page.
  • Made minor formatting adjustments to YAML examples in the annotations documentation.

generated by genaiscript pr-describe

"-prc, --pull-request-comment <string>",
"create comment on a pull request."
"-prc, --pull-request-comment [string]",
"create comment on a pull request.", ""
)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similarly, the square brackets around [string] for the --pull-request-description option indicate that the argument is optional, but there's no default value provided in the code. Make sure to provide a default value or handle the case where the argument might be omitted. 👍

generated by genaiscript pr-review-commit

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 4, 2024

Caution

The square brackets around [string] for the --pull-request-comment option suggest that the argument is optional, but the default value "" is not provided in the code. Consider adding a default value or handling the case where the argument might be omitted. 😊 (packages/cli/src/cli.ts#L101)

Caution

Similarly, the square brackets around [string] for the --pull-request-description option indicate that the argument is optional, but there's no default value provided in the code. Make sure to provide a default value or handle the case where the argument might be omitted. 👍 (packages/cli/src/cli.ts#L107)

Caution

The check if (!filename) return file is added without any comment or explanation. It's important to document the reason for such a check to avoid confusion for future maintainers of the code. Consider adding a comment to explain why the filename check is necessary. 📝 (packages/core/src/file.ts#L27)

generated by genaiscript pr-review-commit

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 4, 2024

The provided GIT_DIFF indicates several updates and additions across documentation and code files. Here's a high-level review:

  • 📝 Documentation updates in automating-scripts.mdx enhance clarity on using GenAIScript with CI/CD pipelines, specifically GitHub Actions, including caching, annotations, and pull request integration.
  • 🛠️ The commands.md file shows updates to CLI options, improving user experience by clarifying the use of flags for pull request comments and descriptions.
  • 🌐 The index.mdx file reflects a minor update, linking the CLI usage to automation scenarios.
  • 🚀 The annotations.md file now includes a section on GitHub Pull Request Review Comments, which is a valuable addition for integrating annotations directly into code reviews.
  • 📦 Dependency updates in package.json files suggest maintenance and keeping up with the latest versions, which is good for security and performance.
  • 🛂 Code changes in TypeScript files (cli.ts and run.ts) seem to handle pull request comments and descriptions more robustly, with default values ensuring smoother operations.

Overall, the changes look good and aim to improve the user experience and integration with GitHub workflows. LGTM 🚀

No functional issues are apparent from the diff, and the TypeScript compiler should handle type checking. The updates seem to be well-aligned with best practices and do not introduce any obvious regressions or concerns.

generated by genaiscript pr-review

@pelikhan pelikhan merged commit 2b839ad into main Jun 4, 2024
9 checks passed
@pelikhan pelikhan deleted the githubactiondocs branch June 4, 2024 16:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant