-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
parameter fix #629
parameter fix #629
Conversation
) | ||
["number", "integer", "string", "boolean", "object"].includes( | ||
(t as any).type | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The type check (t as any).type
might not be safe. Consider using a type guard function to ensure t
is of the expected type. 🛡️
generated by pr-review-commit
type_check
return < | ||
| JSONSchemaNumber | ||
| JSONSchemaString | ||
| JSONSchemaBoolean | ||
| JSONSchemaObject | ||
>t | ||
// TODO better filtering | ||
else if (typeof t === "object") | ||
} else if (typeof t === "object") | ||
return <JSONSchemaObject>{ | ||
type: "object", | ||
properties: Object.fromEntries( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The object type is being set to "object" without any checks. This could lead to unexpected behavior if t
is not an object. Consider adding a type check before setting the type. 🧐
generated by pr-review-commit
object_type
return < | ||
| JSONSchemaNumber | ||
| JSONSchemaString | ||
| JSONSchemaBoolean | ||
| JSONSchemaObject | ||
>t | ||
// TODO better filtering | ||
else if (typeof t === "object") | ||
} else if (typeof t === "object") | ||
return <JSONSchemaObject>{ | ||
type: "object", | ||
properties: Object.fromEntries( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The properties of the object are being set using Object.fromEntries()
. This could lead to unexpected behavior if the entries are not key-value pairs. Consider adding a check to ensure the entries are in the correct format. 🕵️♀️
generated by pr-review-commit
object_properties
The changes in the pull request expand the potential types accepted by the LGTM 🚀
|
return < | ||
| JSONSchemaNumber | ||
| JSONSchemaString | ||
| JSONSchemaBoolean | ||
| JSONSchemaObject | ||
>t | ||
// TODO better filtering | ||
else if (typeof t === "object") | ||
} else if (typeof t === "object") | ||
return <JSONSchemaObject>{ | ||
type: "object", | ||
properties: Object.fromEntries( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The object creation <JSONSchemaObject>{ type: "object", properties: Object.fromEntries() }
is missing arguments for Object.fromEntries()
. This could lead to unexpected behavior. 🧩
generated by pr-review-commit
object_creation
["number", "integer", "string", "boolean", "object"].includes( | ||
(t as any).type | ||
) | ||
) { | ||
return < | ||
| JSONSchemaNumber | ||
| JSONSchemaString | ||
| JSONSchemaBoolean | ||
| JSONSchemaObject |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The types JSONSchemaBoolean
and JSONSchemaObject
are declared but not used in the function. Consider removing or using them to avoid confusion. 🧹
generated by pr-review-commit
unused_code
fix parameter tests
The GIT_DIFF demonstrates several modifications across the codebase.
A couple of general categories of changes are evident:
Modifications on Type Checks 🧐: In the
parameters.ts
file, there's an alteration to the set of types that are checked for being of "object" type.boolean
is added, which implies that objects of type boolean are now taken into account in the conditional checks.Additional Console Log Statements 🖨️: The
parameters.genai.js
file has three extra console log statements. Now, it logs the type and value ofstringSchema
,numberSchema
, andbooleanSchema
. It suggests a motive for better debugging or data validation.Removal of User Output 💻: There is the removal of a section that outputs formatted text to the prompt in
parameters.genai.js
. It might improve the flow by avoiding unnecessary user prompts.Updated Token Limit & Task Description 💼: In the
summarize-max-tokens.genai.js
file, themaxTokens
have been doubled from 20 to 40, indicating an extension in the summarization task scope. Moreover, the task description echoed to the console has been transformed from summarization to keyword extraction.Task Reinvention 🔄: In the
summary-of-summary-phi3.genai.js
file, the original task was to summarize the file in plain text, but now the task is to extract keywords. The change of task scope echoes the alteration seen insummarize-max-tokens.genai.js
.So, a high-level takeaway of these changes is, it appears the tasks are slowly evolving and moving from the concept of summarization to keyword extraction.