Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

parameter fix #629

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024
Merged

parameter fix #629

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

pelikhan
Copy link
Member

@pelikhan pelikhan commented Aug 19, 2024

fix parameter tests

  • The GIT_DIFF demonstrates several modifications across the codebase.

  • A couple of general categories of changes are evident:

    • Modifications on Type Checks 🧐: In the parameters.ts file, there's an alteration to the set of types that are checked for being of "object" type. boolean is added, which implies that objects of type boolean are now taken into account in the conditional checks.

    • Additional Console Log Statements 🖨️: The parameters.genai.js file has three extra console log statements. Now, it logs the type and value of stringSchema, numberSchema, and booleanSchema. It suggests a motive for better debugging or data validation.

    • Removal of User Output 💻: There is the removal of a section that outputs formatted text to the prompt in parameters.genai.js. It might improve the flow by avoiding unnecessary user prompts.

    • Updated Token Limit & Task Description 💼: In the summarize-max-tokens.genai.js file, the maxTokens have been doubled from 20 to 40, indicating an extension in the summarization task scope. Moreover, the task description echoed to the console has been transformed from summarization to keyword extraction.

    • Task Reinvention 🔄: In the summary-of-summary-phi3.genai.js file, the original task was to summarize the file in plain text, but now the task is to extract keywords. The change of task scope echoes the alteration seen in summarize-max-tokens.genai.js.

  • So, a high-level takeaway of these changes is, it appears the tasks are slowly evolving and moving from the concept of summarization to keyword extraction.

generated by pr-describe

)
["number", "integer", "string", "boolean", "object"].includes(
(t as any).type
)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The type check (t as any).type might not be safe. Consider using a type guard function to ensure t is of the expected type. 🛡️

generated by pr-review-commit type_check

return <
| JSONSchemaNumber
| JSONSchemaString
| JSONSchemaBoolean
| JSONSchemaObject
>t
// TODO better filtering
else if (typeof t === "object")
} else if (typeof t === "object")
return <JSONSchemaObject>{
type: "object",
properties: Object.fromEntries(

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The object type is being set to "object" without any checks. This could lead to unexpected behavior if t is not an object. Consider adding a type check before setting the type. 🧐

generated by pr-review-commit object_type

return <
| JSONSchemaNumber
| JSONSchemaString
| JSONSchemaBoolean
| JSONSchemaObject
>t
// TODO better filtering
else if (typeof t === "object")
} else if (typeof t === "object")
return <JSONSchemaObject>{
type: "object",
properties: Object.fromEntries(

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The properties of the object are being set using Object.fromEntries(). This could lead to unexpected behavior if the entries are not key-value pairs. Consider adding a check to ensure the entries are in the correct format. 🕵️‍♀️

generated by pr-review-commit object_properties

Copy link

The changes in the pull request expand the potential types accepted by the promptParameterTypeToJSONSchema function. Specifically, the "boolean" type is now accepted along with "number", "integer", "string", and "object". There are no functional issues with these changes, as the code appears to be extending the functionality in a reasonable way.

LGTM 🚀

generated by pr-review

return <
| JSONSchemaNumber
| JSONSchemaString
| JSONSchemaBoolean
| JSONSchemaObject
>t
// TODO better filtering
else if (typeof t === "object")
} else if (typeof t === "object")
return <JSONSchemaObject>{
type: "object",
properties: Object.fromEntries(

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The object creation <JSONSchemaObject>{ type: "object", properties: Object.fromEntries() } is missing arguments for Object.fromEntries(). This could lead to unexpected behavior. 🧩

generated by pr-review-commit object_creation

["number", "integer", "string", "boolean", "object"].includes(
(t as any).type
)
) {
return <
| JSONSchemaNumber
| JSONSchemaString
| JSONSchemaBoolean
| JSONSchemaObject

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The types JSONSchemaBoolean and JSONSchemaObject are declared but not used in the function. Consider removing or using them to avoid confusion. 🧹

generated by pr-review-commit unused_code

@pelikhan pelikhan merged commit 2fd40ea into main Aug 19, 2024
9 checks passed
@pelikhan pelikhan deleted the parmeters-fix branch August 19, 2024 21:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant