This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 24, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adding vLLM inference entrypoints to Flamingo #18
Adding vLLM inference entrypoints to Flamingo #18
Changes from 12 commits
59c7827
72f0973
0c048fe
f5668a1
b57df40
0aa4f85
117c328
d946c82
7665c56
d565631
7b1651f
a14250c
3d40a37
a50d6e6
402f2f7
91caf14
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This line not necessary, since
requirements_lock.txt
doesn't exist in this repoThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that's fine, was following the pattern of
model_config_with_repo_id
andmodel_config_with_artifact
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What are these docstrings for?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
to make it slightly clearer why we're running the same test twice, alternatively I could also fold this into one paramterized test. actually, I think I'll do that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's fine then, I would just add the to within the test function body, not the middle of the file :D