Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Improve C scanner conditional inclusion
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Simplistic macro replacement is now done on the contents of CPPDEFINES,
to improve accuracy of conditional inclusion as compared to the real
preprocessor (ref: issue SCons#4623).

Signed-off-by: Mats Wichmann <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
mwichmann committed Nov 18, 2024
1 parent 26beede commit 95f6dab
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 74 additions and 14 deletions.
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions CHANGES.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -150,6 +150,9 @@ RELEASE VERSION/DATE TO BE FILLED IN LATER
types depending on whether zero, one, or multiple construction
variable names are given.
- Update Clean and NoClean documentation.
- The C scanner now does (limited) macro replacement on the values in
CPPDEFINES, to improve results of conditional source file inclusion
(issue #4523).


RELEASE 4.8.1 - Tue, 03 Sep 2024 17:22:20 -0700
Expand Down
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions RELEASE.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -137,6 +137,10 @@ FIXES
- Skip running a few validation tests if the user is root and the test is
not designed to work for the root user.

- The C scanner now does (limited) macro replacement on the values in
CPPDEFINES, to improve results of conditional source file inclusion
(issue #4523).

IMPROVEMENTS
------------

Expand Down
69 changes: 55 additions & 14 deletions SCons/Scanner/C.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
add_scanner() for each affected suffix.
"""

from typing import Dict
import SCons.Node.FS
import SCons.cpp
import SCons.Util
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -66,31 +67,69 @@ def read_file(self, file) -> str:
return ''

def dictify_CPPDEFINES(env) -> dict:
"""Returns CPPDEFINES converted to a dict.
This should be similar to :func:`~SCons.Defaults.processDefines`.
Unfortunately, we can't do the simple thing of calling that routine and
passing the result to the dict() constructor, because it turns the defines
into a list of "name=value" pairs, which the dict constructor won't
consume correctly. Also cannot just call dict on CPPDEFINES itself - it's
fine if it's stored in the converted form (currently deque of tuples), but
CPPDEFINES could be in other formats too.
So we have to do all the work here - keep concepts in sync with
``processDefines``.
"""Return CPPDEFINES converted to a dict for preprocessor emulation.
The concept is similar to :func:`~SCons.Defaults.processDefines`:
turn the values stored in an internal form in ``env['CPPDEFINES']``
into one usable in a specific context - in this case the cpp-like
work the C/C++ scanner will do. We can't reuse ``processDefines``
output as that's a list of strings for the command line. We also can't
pass the ``CPPDEFINES`` variable directly to the ``dict`` constructor,
as SCons allows it to be stored in several different ways - it's only
after ``Append`` and relatives has been called we know for sure it will
be a deque of tuples.
Since the result here won't pass through a real preprocessor, simulate
some of the macro replacement that would take place if it did, or some
conditional inclusions might come out wrong. A bit of an edge case, but
does happen (GH #4623). See 6.10.5 in the C standard and 15.6 in the
C++ standard).
.. versionchanged:: NEXT_RELEASE
Simple macro replacement added.
"""
def _replace(mapping: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Simplistic macro replacer for dictify_CPPDEFINES.
*mapping* is scanned for any value that is the same as a key in
the dict, and is replaced by the value of that key; the process
is repeated. This is a cheap approximation of the C preprocessor's
macro replacement rules with no smarts - it doesn't "look inside"
the values, so only triggers on object-like macros, not on
function-like macros, and will not work on complex values,
e.g. a value like ``(1UL << PR_MTE_TCF_SHIFT)`` would not have
``PR_MTE_TCF_SHIFT`` replaced if it was also in ``CPPDEFINES``,
but rather left as-is for the scanner to do comparisons against.
Args:
mapping: a dictionary representing macro names and replacements.
Returns:
a dictionary with substitutions made.
"""
old_ns = mapping
ns = {}
while True:
ns = {k: old_ns[v] if v in old_ns else v for k, v in old_ns.items()}
if old_ns == ns:
break
old_ns = ns
return ns

cppdefines = env.get('CPPDEFINES', {})
result = {}
if cppdefines is None:
return result

if SCons.Util.is_Tuple(cppdefines):
# single macro defined in a tuple
try:
return {cppdefines[0]: cppdefines[1]}
except IndexError:
return {cppdefines[0]: None}

if SCons.Util.is_Sequence(cppdefines):
# multiple (presumably) macro defines in a deque, list, etc.
for c in cppdefines:
if SCons.Util.is_Sequence(c):
try:
Expand All @@ -107,17 +146,19 @@ def dictify_CPPDEFINES(env) -> dict:
else:
# don't really know what to do here
result[c] = None
return result
return _replace(result)

if SCons.Util.is_String(cppdefines):
# single macro define in a string
try:
name, value = cppdefines.split('=')
return {name: value}
except ValueError:
return {cppdefines: None}

if SCons.Util.is_Dict(cppdefines):
return cppdefines
# already in the desired form
return _replace(result)

return {cppdefines: None}

Expand Down
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions SCons/Scanner/CTests.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -572,6 +572,18 @@ def runTest(self) -> None:
expect = {"STRING": "VALUE", "UNVALUED": None}
self.assertEqual(d, expect)

with self.subTest("CPPDEFINES with macro replacement"):
env = DummyEnvironment(
CPPDEFINES=[
("STRING", "VALUE"),
("REPLACEABLE", "RVALUE"),
("RVALUE", "AVALUE"),
]
)
d = SCons.Scanner.C.dictify_CPPDEFINES(env)
expect = {"STRING": "VALUE", "REPLACEABLE": "AVALUE", "RVALUE": "AVALUE"}
self.assertEqual(d, expect)


if __name__ == "__main__":
unittest.main()
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 95f6dab

Please sign in to comment.