Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

commenting out herschel #291

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2024
Merged

commenting out herschel #291

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

jkrick
Copy link
Contributor

@jkrick jkrick commented Jul 25, 2024

last PR seems to have been empty...trying again to do the same thing...

super small PR to

  • complete the table at the top of the code to indicate the source of the herschel data
  • comment out the lines in the herschel module which do the actual work.
    In the SP meeting Jul/24 we decided that this module is functional but too slow to include. We will leave it commented out in the notebook so that CI/CD can run, and people can use it if they like, but the whole notebook will not be slowed down by the herschel archive.

@jkrick jkrick self-assigned this Jul 25, 2024
@jkrick jkrick requested a review from bsipocz July 25, 2024 20:11
@jkrick jkrick added the use case: spectroscopy Spectroscopy use case label Jul 25, 2024
@bsipocz bsipocz merged commit a3aa90c into main Jul 25, 2024
3 checks passed
@bsipocz bsipocz deleted the redo_herschel_comment_out branch July 25, 2024 20:13
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
use case: spectroscopy Spectroscopy use case
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants