Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Document the release process for upgrading the contract code for the DAOs #97

Draft
wants to merge 26 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ctindogaru
Copy link
Collaborator

@ctindogaru ctindogaru commented Jan 27, 2022

This is still work in progress, there are still steps that need to be detailed.

@ctindogaru ctindogaru force-pushed the document-release-process branch from 1277065 to e1026e7 Compare January 27, 2022 11:55
@ctindogaru ctindogaru changed the title Document the release process for upgrading the contract code for the DAOs [WIP] Document the release process for upgrading the contract code for the DAOs Jan 27, 2022
@mikedotexe
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you so much for this. I was just reviewing a pull request and thinking how handy it would be to flesh out a definitive guide like this. 🙌🏼

@ctindogaru ctindogaru force-pushed the document-release-process branch 2 times, most recently from 0e4d83d to b1194aa Compare January 28, 2022 15:32
@ctindogaru ctindogaru force-pushed the document-release-process branch from b1194aa to 1c7d69d Compare January 28, 2022 15:34
@ctindogaru ctindogaru force-pushed the document-release-process branch from 803e7e9 to 2f55914 Compare January 28, 2022 15:38
@ctindogaru ctindogaru force-pushed the document-release-process branch from f52db15 to 692068d Compare January 28, 2022 16:01
@TrevorJTClarke TrevorJTClarke self-requested a review February 3, 2022 17:04
@ctindogaru ctindogaru force-pushed the document-release-process branch from a360d79 to 5db82cd Compare February 4, 2022 10:34
@ctindogaru ctindogaru force-pushed the document-release-process branch from 5db82cd to d4e5e87 Compare February 4, 2022 10:35
@ctindogaru ctindogaru force-pushed the document-release-process branch 2 times, most recently from ae6a99f to a3165fd Compare February 4, 2022 11:50
@ctindogaru ctindogaru force-pushed the document-release-process branch 3 times, most recently from aa6ae9d to 66b3e07 Compare February 4, 2022 11:58
@ctindogaru ctindogaru force-pushed the document-release-process branch 5 times, most recently from 52f1bd4 to ed89ea8 Compare February 4, 2022 12:17
@ctindogaru ctindogaru force-pushed the document-release-process branch 6 times, most recently from 1c8607c to 49c0b14 Compare February 4, 2022 12:40
@ctindogaru ctindogaru force-pushed the document-release-process branch from 49c0b14 to 5301087 Compare February 4, 2022 12:42
@ctindogaru ctindogaru force-pushed the document-release-process branch from 247dbcf to 614f60e Compare February 4, 2022 12:54
***4. Download the current `wasm` code used for creating new DAOs:***

```bash
near view sputnikv2.testnet get_dao_list
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need to remove this command since the list is so big that it fails. Will redirect people to the astro testnet instead.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was gunna bring that up. I think if we do want to go this route, we have to do pagination. The other function should be the path devs use tho, since it already has pagination

@TrevorJTClarke
Copy link
Contributor

@ctindogaru docs look good - going to move them into a scripts folder that can be used as tools during the upgrade process.
Also see: https://github.com/near-daos/sputnik-dao-contract/wiki/Sputnik-Factory-V2-Upgrade-Action-Plan

@TrevorJTClarke TrevorJTClarke self-assigned this Feb 11, 2022
@ctindogaru ctindogaru force-pushed the document-release-process branch from 69bcdf0 to 4f46375 Compare February 14, 2022 14:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants