-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 466
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
tests: update tests that used local_fs&mock_s3 to use one or the other (
#6015) ## Problem This was wasting resources: if we run a test with mock s3 we don't then need to run it again with local fs. When we're running in CI, we don't need to run with the mock/local storage as well as real S3. There is some value in having CI notice/spot issues that might otherwise only happen when running locally, but that doesn't justify the cost of running the tests so many more times on every PR. ## Summary of changes - For tests that used available_remote_storages or available_s3_storages, update them to either specify no remote storage (therefore inherit the default, which is currently local fs), or to specify s3_storage() for the tests that actually want an S3 API.
- Loading branch information
Showing
10 changed files
with
142 additions
and
239 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
5e98855
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No tests were run or test report is not available
Test coverage report is not available
5e98855 at 2023-12-08T15:00:37.900Z :recycle: