-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 456
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stop reading local metadata
file
#6777
stop reading local metadata
file
#6777
Conversation
This is in preparation for the removal of _writing_ it, which will happen in #6769
I did some research:
|
how is the metadata stored within index_part.json then deserialized? |
2436 tests run: 2319 passed, 0 failed, 117 skipped (full report)Code coverage (full report)
The comment gets automatically updated with the latest test results
0388c98 at 2024-02-15T23:20:19.838Z :recycle: |
Good find, will put that into a follow-up.
Isn't that in a failpoint? I'd have to remove the test that uses it as as well, then. I think it actually makes sense to keep it until #6769 as it's concerned with removal of the file / the write path.
I'm confused. Assuming I'm right wrt the faillpoint in the previous quote, do you think there's more work that needs to happen or can we merge this PR as is. |
Good point, let's keep it (for now). |
Building atop #6777, this PR removes the code that writes the `metadata` file and adds a piece of migration code that removes any remaining `metadata` files. We'll remove the migration code after this PR has been deployed. part of #6663 More cleanups punted into follow-up issue, as they touch a lot of code: #6890
part of #6663 See that epic for more context & related commits. Problem ------- Before this PR, the layer-file-creating code paths were using VirtualFile, but under the hood these were still blocking system calls. Generally this meant we'd stall the executor thread, unless the caller "knew" and used the following pattern instead: ``` spawn_blocking(|| { Handle::block_on(async { VirtualFile::....().await; }) }).await ``` Solution -------- This PR adopts `tokio-epoll-uring` on the layer-file-creating code paths in pageserver. Note that on-demand downloads still use `tokio::fs`, these will be converted in a future PR. Design: Avoiding Regressions With `std-fs` ------------------------------------------ If we make the VirtualFile write path truly async using `tokio-epoll-uring`, should we then remove the `spawn_blocking` + `Handle::block_on` usage upstack in the same commit? No, because if we’re still using the `std-fs` io engine, we’d then block the executor in those places where previously we were protecting us from that through the `spawn_blocking` . So, if we want to see benefits from `tokio-epoll-uring` on the write path while also preserving the ability to switch between `tokio-epoll-uring` and `std-fs` , where `std-fs` will behave identical to what we have now, we need to ***conditionally* use `spawn_blocking + Handle::block_on`** . I.e., in the places where we use that know, we’ll need to make that conditional based on the currently configured io engine. It boils down to investigating all the places where we do `spawn_blocking(... block_on(... VirtualFile::...))`. Detailed [write-up of that investigation in Notion](https://neondatabase.notion.site/Surveying-VirtualFile-write-path-usage-wrt-tokio-epoll-uring-integration-spawn_blocking-Handle-bl-5dc2270dbb764db7b2e60803f375e015?pvs=4 ), made publicly accessible. tl;dr: Preceding PRs addressed the relevant call sites: - `metadata` file: turns out we could simply remove it (#6777, #6769, #6775) - `create_delta_layer()`: made sensitive to `virtual_file_io_engine` in #6986 NB: once we are switched over to `tokio-epoll-uring` everywhere in production, we can deprecate `std-fs`; to keep macOS support, we can use `tokio::fs` instead. That will remove this whole headache. Code Changes In This PR ----------------------- - VirtualFile API changes - `VirtualFile::write_at` - implement an `ioengine` operation and switch `VirtualFile::write_at` to it - `VirtualFile::metadata()` - curiously, we only use it from the layer writers' `finish()` methods - introduce a wrapper `Metadata` enum because `std::fs::Metadata` cannot be constructed by code outside rust std - `VirtualFile::sync_all()` and for completeness sake, add `VirtualFile::sync_data()` Testing & Rollout ----------------- Before merging this PR, we ran the CI with both io engines. Additionally, the changes will soak in staging. We could have a feature gate / add a new io engine `tokio-epoll-uring-write-path` to do a gradual rollout. However, that's not part of this PR. Future Work ----------- There's still some use of `std::fs` and/or `tokio::fs` for directory namespace operations, e.g. `std::fs::rename`. We're not addressing those in this PR, as we'll need to add the support in tokio-epoll-uring first. Note that rename itself is usually fast if the directory is in the kernel dentry cache, and only the fsync after rename is slow. These fsyncs are using tokio-epoll-uring, so, the impact should be small.
Problem
The local
metadata
file is effectively unused if remote storage is configured, because remote storage is the authority.We do write and read it, but, we never use its contents.
In particular, during startup, we write each metadata file with the contents fetched from remote storage during
preload
.Effectively, that's a
VirtualFile::crashsafe_overwrite
for each timeline.Further, it turns out that we can delete a bunch of legacy code if we stop caring about the
metadata
file.Refs:
Solution
This PR removes any code that reads the file.
We continue to write (and delete it) as before.
Once we've released this version and are sure we won't roll back, we will remove the code that writes it.
That'll happen in #6769.
The price is that it's now required to run with remote storage anymore.
We agree that we want to get there eventually, so this is the first step.
see #4099
Review
Reviewers should not just check the changes in this PR (which are code deletions, mostly).
But also they should ensure that after this change, absence of the file does not change any outcomes.
This means auditing the code base for, example,
stat
of the fileNotFound
isn't treated as if it is success