Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

walredo benchmark: throughput-oriented rewrite #7190

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 21, 2024

Conversation

problame
Copy link
Contributor

@problame problame commented Mar 20, 2024

See the updated bench_walredo.rs module comment.

tl;dr: we measure avg latency of single redo operations issues against a single redo manager from N tokio tasks.

part of #6628

@problame problame requested a review from koivunej March 20, 2024 18:07
@problame problame requested a review from a team as a code owner March 20, 2024 18:07
@problame problame mentioned this pull request Mar 20, 2024
1 task
@problame problame changed the title rewrite walredo benchmark walredo benchmark: throughput-oriented rewrite Mar 20, 2024
@problame problame linked an issue Mar 20, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
1 task
@problame problame removed a link to an issue Mar 20, 2024
1 task
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 20, 2024

2706 tests run: 2573 passed, 0 failed, 133 skipped (full report)


Flaky tests (1)

Postgres 15

  • test_sharding_split_smoke: debug

Code coverage* (full report)

  • functions: 28.2% (7207 of 25519 functions)
  • lines: 46.9% (44237 of 94370 lines)

* collected from Rust tests only


The comment gets automatically updated with the latest test results
b2f5b84 at 2024-03-21T13:49:06.654Z :recycle:

@problame problame merged commit fb60278 into main Mar 21, 2024
53 checks passed
@problame problame deleted the problame/async-walredo/better-benchmark branch March 21, 2024 14:24
problame added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants