storage controller: make scheduling more stable wrt optimization #9275
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
During scheduling, if we are scheduling an even number of shards across an odd number of nodes (e.g. 8 on 5), we can end up choosing to put two secondaries on the same node, which makes that node's affinity score high, and causes two attached locations to go onto some other node. Later, the optimizer migrates one of those attachments away, violating our expectation that the initial scheduling of a tenant should agree with the optimizer, to avoid generating spurious migrations.
Closes: #8969
Summary of changes
This change is incomplete -- the change to secondary scheduling has a knock-on effect on what happens when adding nodes, which can be fixed by changing how optimize_secondary works, but that change is not safe wrt AZs. I think we might need a more general re-think on how optimize-secondary works.
Checklist before requesting a review
Checklist before merging