Make have_to_want with templates

[alkino]

This pull request try to clean have_to_want algorithm:

• Having a hpp file instead of cpp file,
• Use template so that the algorithm can be included twice,
• Remove usage of 3 configurations variables by preprocessor (before the algorithm was paramretrized by preprocessor variable leading to some weird inclusion),
• Use std::vector<> instead of new T*,
• Create a new structure Data to group data, count and displ.

Should the structure Data be move in MPI code and be accepted by the interface itself?

Should we found a better name for this structure ^^?

[azure-pipelines]

✔️ 4d97ee7 -> Azure artifacts URL

[azure-pipelines]

✔️ 1979d3d -> Azure artifacts URL

[azure-pipelines]

✔️ 8b0b0bc -> Azure artifacts URL

[azure-pipelines]

✔️ b782b1b -> Azure artifacts URL

[azure-pipelines]

✔️ 1ac1f95 -> Azure artifacts URL

[azure-pipelines]

✔️ 6c34480 -> Azure artifacts URL

[azure-pipelines]

✔️ f70c2ae -> Azure artifacts URL

[azure-pipelines]

✔️ f70c2ae -> Azure artifacts URL

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (d2c8c4b) 66.20% compared to head (cdc85b5) 66.19%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/nrniv/have2want.hpp	96.34%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2645      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   66.20%   66.19%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         559      559              
  Lines      108957   108939      -18     
==========================================
- Hits        72132    72112      -20     
- Misses      36825    36827       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[pramodk]

Should the structure Data be move in MPI code and be accepted by the interface itself?
Should we found a better name for this structure ^^?

It's local / used in one file, right? In that case, don't have a strong opinion for both questions.

[azure-pipelines]

✔️ e187b1b -> Azure artifacts URL

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

The SonarCloud Quality Gate passed, but some issues were introduced.

8 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[bbpbuildbot]

Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #183854 (:no_entry:) have been uploaded here!

Status and direct links:

• ✅ mac_m1_cmake_build: [cmake, ON, OFF, OFF, address]
• ✅ spack_setup
• ✅ build:nmodl
• ✅ build:neuron:nmodl:intel:legacy
• ✅ build:neuron:nmodl:intel:shared
• ✅ build:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:acc:legacy
• ✅ build:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:acc:shared
• ✅ build:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:omp:legacy
• ✅ build:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:omp
• ✅ test:neuron:nmodl:intel:legacy
• ⛔ test:neuron:nmodl:intel:shared
• ✅ test:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:acc:legacy
• ✅ test:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:acc:shared
• ✅ test:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:omp:legacy
• ✅ test:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:omp

[azure-pipelines]

✔️ cdc85b5 -> Azure artifacts URL

[pramodk]

LGTM