chore: test PR merging #6585 and #6577

[jfecher]

Description

Problem*

Resolves

Summary*

Merges #6585 and #6577 to see opcode count differences.

Additional Context

Documentation*

Check one:

• No documentation needed.
• Documentation included in this PR.
• [For Experimental Features] Documentation to be submitted in a separate PR.

PR Checklist*

• I have tested the changes locally.
• I have formatted the changes with Prettier and/or cargo fmt on default settings.

[github-actions]

Changes to Brillig bytecode sizes

Generated at commit: a8a76baa85ec4a781e0f12c9d62f3be427628476, compared to commit: 45eb7568d56b2d254453b85f236d554232aa5df9

🧾 Summary (10% most significant diffs)

Program	Brillig opcodes (+/-)	%
nested_array_dynamic	+378 ❌	+18.98%
nested_array_in_slice	+181 ❌	+15.08%
brillig_rc_regression_6123	+24 ❌	+13.41%
nested_dyn_array_regression_5782	+15 ❌	+8.98%
regression_struct_array_conditional	+44 ❌	+8.22%
brillig_nested_arrays	+11 ❌	+6.43%

---

Full diff report 👇

Program	Brillig opcodes (+/-)	%
nested_array_dynamic	2,370 (+378)	+18.98%
nested_array_in_slice	1,381 (+181)	+15.08%
brillig_rc_regression_6123	203 (+24)	+13.41%
nested_dyn_array_regression_5782	182 (+15)	+8.98%
regression_struct_array_conditional	579 (+44)	+8.22%
brillig_nested_arrays	182 (+11)	+6.43%
fold_2_to_17	651 (+34)	+5.51%
bench_2_to_17	373 (+17)	+4.78%
poseidon2	380 (+17)	+4.68%
hashmap	21,423 (+898)	+4.38%
no_predicates_numeric_generic_poseidon	828 (+34)	+4.28%
fold_numeric_generic_poseidon	828 (+34)	+4.28%
array_sort	316 (+12)	+3.95%
array_dynamic_nested_blackbox_input	905 (+33)	+3.78%
brillig_cow	392 (+12)	+3.16%
uhashmap	13,909 (+381)	+2.82%
wildcard_type	297 (+7)	+2.41%
eddsa	10,890 (+203)	+1.90%
bigint	2,029 (+33)	+1.65%
slices	2,068 (+31)	+1.52%
regression_5252	4,723 (+69)	+1.48%
array_to_slice	830 (+12)	+1.47%
to_be_bytes	214 (+3)	+1.42%
6	1,145 (+16)	+1.42%
conditional_regression_short_circuit	1,218 (+16)	+1.33%
poseidon_bn254_hash	5,520 (+72)	+1.32%
poseidon_bn254_hash_width_3	5,520 (+72)	+1.32%
poseidonsponge_x5_254	4,323 (+54)	+1.26%
slice_regex	2,187 (+21)	+0.97%
regression_4449	735 (+6)	+0.82%
sha256	2,256 (+18)	+0.80%
ecdsa_secp256k1	909 (+6)	+0.66%
aes128_encrypt	516 (+3)	+0.58%
array_dynamic_blackbox_input	1,033 (+6)	+0.58%
conditional_1	1,200 (+6)	+0.50%
sha256_var_witness_const_regression	1,250 (+6)	+0.48%
sha2_byte	2,826 (+12)	+0.43%
regression	735 (+3)	+0.41%
sha256_var_size_regression	1,723 (+6)	+0.35%
slice_dynamic_index	2,646 (+6)	+0.23%
sha256_regression	6,580 (+12)	+0.18%
sha256_var_padding_regression	4,795 (+2)	+0.04%

[github-actions]

Changes to circuit sizes

Generated at commit: a8a76baa85ec4a781e0f12c9d62f3be427628476, compared to commit: 45eb7568d56b2d254453b85f236d554232aa5df9

🧾 Summary (10% most significant diffs)

Program	ACIR opcodes (+/-)	%	Circuit size (+/-)	%
nested_array_dynamic	+161 ❌	+4.91%	+283 ❌	+2.24%
array_dynamic_nested_blackbox_input	+6 ❌	+2.43%	+17 ❌	+0.23%

---

Full diff report 👇

Program	ACIR opcodes (+/-)	%	Circuit size (+/-)	%
nested_array_dynamic	3,442 (+161)	+4.91%	12,933 (+283)	+2.24%
array_dynamic_nested_blackbox_input	253 (+6)	+2.43%	7,326 (+17)	+0.23%

[jfecher]

Curious that opcode & constraint count diffs are the same as in #6585, but unlike that PR the opcodes executed is unchanged from master?

Maybe its because the other PR has more commits, and if opcodes executed becomes unchanged then the comment isn't updated?