Single anchor used two times in the user guide

[pvagner]

Steps to reproduce:

• Open this link:

  nvda/user_docs/en/userGuide.md

  Lines 42 to 48 in 47695ac

  	#### Recommended System Requirements {#MinimumSystemRequirements}
  	* Operating Systems: 64-bit editions of Windows 10, Windows 11, and Window Server 2022
  	* both AMD64 and ARM64 variants of Windows are supported.
  	* at least 150 MB of storage space.
  	* at least 4 GB of RAM.
  	#### Minimum System Requirements {#MinimumSystemRequirements}

• Look through line 42 and line 48

Actual behavior:

Same anchor is defined twice. Thus it's not possible to link to individual headings Recommended system requirements or Minimum system requirements

Expected behavior:

I have noticed this while translating user guide into slovak.
I think the anchor for Recommended system requirements should be changed into #RecommendedSystemRequirements`

NVDA logs, crash dumps and other attachments:

System configuration

NVDA installed/portable/running from source:

Not applicable. I am reading user guide in a web browser.

NVDA version:

Current development version

Windows version:

Name and version of other software in use when reproducing the issue:

Other information about your system:

Other questions

Does the issue still occur after restarting your computer?

Have you tried any other versions of NVDA? If so, please report their behaviors.

If NVDA add-ons are disabled, is your problem still occurring?

Does the issue still occur after you run the COM Registration Fixing Tool in NVDA's tools menu?

[josephsl]

CC @Qchristensen, while at it, I propose rewriting these sections to state the absolute minimum system requirements (for all users) before stating recommended system requirements. Another option is to present the system requirements as a table, with separate columns for minimum and recommended requirements. That way we can only deal with one anchor.

Thanks.

[Qchristensen]

Thanks @pvagner for raising this - and you are right @josephsl - it makes sense to have the minimum requirements above the recommended requirements. I've created PR #16959 to address both.