Slhmy/judge result

[slhmy]

We should discuss whether the design is acceptable.

[Zztrans]

In current judger, if a previous testdata fail, it will still run next test.

So the struct is fine, the len can be abtain by []TestPoints.

The judger may be expected to not run next data if fail previously?

Maybe a total testdata len is needed?

[slhmy]

In current judger, if a previous testdata fail, it will still run next test.

So the struct is fine, the len can be abtain by []TestPoints.

The judger may be expected to not run next data if fail previously?

Maybe a total testdata len is needed?

Fair enough, but maybe we should use map for TestPoints? Because idx of each testcase is the filename.

[akamya997]

It is enough and we can see how the judger works with memory later.