Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix testnet EVM replay #6759

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

janezpodhostnik
Copy link
Contributor

Extracted from #6755.

This was needed to fix the re-execution on testsnet

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 41.24%. Comparing base (b3d0864) to head (25a8af5).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
fvm/evm/offchain/blocks/block_context.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6759      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   41.24%   41.24%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        2061     2061              
  Lines      182687   182687              
==========================================
- Hits        75358    75348      -10     
- Misses     101019   101031      +12     
+ Partials     6310     6308       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 41.24% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@janezpodhostnik janezpodhostnik added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 25, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit a164070 Nov 25, 2024
55 checks passed
@janezpodhostnik janezpodhostnik deleted the janez/fix-testnet-evm-replay branch November 25, 2024 21:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants