Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify installer watchers #180

Merged

Conversation

tamalsaha
Copy link
Contributor

@tamalsaha tamalsaha commented Mar 7, 2024

There is no real logical change here. I am just using the EnqueueRequestsFromMapFunc method in controller-runtime to simplify the code.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from xuezhaojun and yue9944882 March 7, 2024 23:18
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 22 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 23.61%. Comparing base (7491951) to head (9a2429e).

Files Patch % Lines
...yserver/controllers/service_resolver_controller.go 0.00% 22 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #180      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   23.86%   23.61%   -0.26%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines        1194     1207      +13     
==========================================
  Hits          285      285              
- Misses        892      905      +13     
  Partials       17       17              
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 23.61% <0.00%> (-0.26%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@qiujian16
Copy link
Member

/assign @xuezhaojun

SGTM
/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 8, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: qiujian16, tamalsaha

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Mar 8, 2024
@xuezhaojun
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Mar 8, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit b0cc356 into open-cluster-management-io:main Mar 8, 2024
9 checks passed
@tamalsaha tamalsaha deleted the handy branch March 8, 2024 18:21
openshift-merge-bot bot referenced this pull request in stolostron/cluster-proxy Mar 20, 2024
* Remove codecov token in actions. (#174)

Signed-off-by: xuezhaojun <[email protected]>

* Use k8s 1.29 client libs (#175)

Signed-off-by: Tamal Saha <[email protected]>

* Fix the verify error of logger. (#177)

Signed-off-by: GitHub <[email protected]>

* Upgrade chart version to 0.4.0. (#178)

Signed-off-by: GitHub <[email protected]>

* Update workflows. (#179)

Signed-off-by: GitHub <[email protected]>

* Simplify installer watchers (#180)

Signed-off-by: Tamal Saha <[email protected]>

* Remove unused code (#181)

Signed-off-by: Tamal Saha <[email protected]>

* Fix LB type proxy server setup in chart (#182)

Signed-off-by: Tamal Saha <[email protected]>

* Use default rollingout strategy. (#184)

Signed-off-by: GitHub <[email protected]>

* Add the hash value of signer into subject organizationunits (#183)

Signed-off-by: GitHub <[email protected]>

* Change examples to md format to reduce dependences. (#185)

Signed-off-by: GitHub <[email protected]>

* Update stolostronagent.

Signed-off-by: GitHub <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: xuezhaojun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tamal Saha <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: GitHub <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tamal Saha <[email protected]>
tamalsaha added a commit to kluster-manager/cluster-proxy that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants