Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve descriptions in release schema #1303

Closed
wants to merge 30 commits into from

Conversation

ColinMaudry
Copy link
Member

Check descriptions in the release schema against the style guide.

@ColinMaudry ColinMaudry self-assigned this Jun 1, 2021
@ColinMaudry ColinMaudry marked this pull request as draft June 1, 2021 09:14
@ColinMaudry ColinMaudry linked an issue Jun 11, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
3 tasks
@ColinMaudry ColinMaudry requested a review from jpmckinney June 11, 2021 12:10
@ColinMaudry
Copy link
Member Author

@jpmckinney This PR is a first attempt at normalizing schema field descriptions, applying the style guide consistently. Is it going in the right direction? Thanks!

@ColinMaudry ColinMaudry marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2021 12:00
@ColinMaudry
Copy link
Member Author

@jpmckinney Ready for review! :)

@jpmckinney jpmckinney added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Jul 31, 2021
@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

This issue has many conflicts, since various other PRs end up changing one or two fields. I think it might be better to draft changes in a document (allowing comments and suggested edits – I don't think Google Sheets yet has this functionality), which we then transfer to a PR. Otherwise, it will be very long and confusing to resolve conflicts.

@ColinMaudry ColinMaudry closed this Apr 1, 2023
@jpmckinney jpmckinney deleted the 850_improveDescriptions branch April 3, 2023 19:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Adopt consistent style in field and code descriptions
3 participants