-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix unmarshal of empty type leaf value for gNMI encoding #292
Open
cho-m
wants to merge
5
commits into
openconfig:master
Choose a base branch
from
cho-m:fix-unmarshal-gnmi-empty-leaf
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b39286e
Fix unmarshal of empty type leaf value for gNMI encoding
1e8eb33
Merge branch 'master' into fix-unmarshal-gnmi-empty-leaf
wenovus 888bea4
Merge branch 'master' into fix-unmarshal-gnmi-empty-leaf
wenovus 4c90480
Merge branch 'master' into fix-unmarshal-gnmi-empty-leaf
wenovus be89046
Merge branch 'master' into fix-unmarshal-gnmi-empty-leaf
wenovus File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suspect that we really need to make
yang.Yempty
always set the field totrue
if we receive this. SinceYANGEmpty
isn't a pointer in the generated code, then if we receive an empty field that has a bool value offalse
then this won't be something that the client application can tell was received. Could you add this handling as a special case please?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually there already appears to be handling for this case:
ygot/util/reflect.go
Lines 256 to 262 in f01913a
When unmarshalling an empty leaf from a
TypedValue
in the current code,unmarshalScalar
returns the non-pointer bool value, whichunmarshalLeaf
then takes and then feeds intoInsertIntoStruct
(directly or indirectly) to reach this special handling code.This change doesn't support unmarshalling empty leafs (either JSON or gNMI) into a union type. However given its complexity I think it deserves to be addressed separately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I explored the question of unions containing empty in #582.