Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCM-11043 | test: automated case id:76543 #2606

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jfrazierRH
Copy link
Contributor

ginkgo run -focus 76543 tests/e2e
Running Suite: ROSA CLI e2e tests suite - /Users/jfrazier/workspace/rosa/tests/e2e

Random Seed: 1731037536

Will run 1 of 252 specs
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS•SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

Ran 1 of 252 Specs in 13.325 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 1 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 251 Skipped
PASS

Ginkgo ran 1 suite in 20.007141041s
Test Suite Passed

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 8, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 8, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jfrazierRH
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign gdbranco for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 8, 2024
@@ -62,6 +62,34 @@ profiles:
account-role:
path: "/test/hcp/"
permission_boundary: "arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/AdministratorAccess"
- as: rosa-hcp-ze
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what does this name:rosa-hcp-ze mean?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not add zero_egress to exist profile?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rosa-hcp-(zero egress)
I added it as a separate profile since there are restrictions about the version itself.

@@ -62,6 +62,34 @@ profiles:
account-role:
path: "/test/hcp/"
permission_boundary: "arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/AdministratorAccess"
- as: rosa-hcp-ze
version: 4.14.38
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about other versions? we use latest version usually

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Currently, zero_egress is only supported for 4.14.y versions. Once the GA is released, I can change this to latest

@@ -657,4 +658,34 @@ var _ = Describe("HCP cluster testing",
}
}
})

It("create zero-egress HCP cluster - [id:76543]",
labels.High, labels.Runtime.Day1,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it can move the step:CreateMachinePool in day2 case

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even though its part of the test case? I know that having a machinepool created on a ZE cluster was an area we wanted tested.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to the rule, we have day1\day2\destoy ... cases. We will filter the case by orde.So if the case is for day1, it would be better to not contain day2 step. We can move it in day2 case other than ignore the step.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No problem, I'll remove the mp portion.

@jfrazierRH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 8, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 8, 2024
@jfrazierRH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-presubmits-pr-rosa-sts-advanced

@jfrazierRH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-presubmits-pr-rosa-hcp-advanced

@jfrazierRH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@jfrazierRH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

4 similar comments
@jfrazierRH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@jfrazierRH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@jfrazierRH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@jfrazierRH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 29.57%. Comparing base (5b36848) to head (fe29b80).
Report is 87 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2606      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   29.41%   29.57%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files         180      183       +3     
  Lines       24994    25156     +162     
==========================================
+ Hits         7353     7440      +87     
- Misses      17057    17125      +68     
- Partials      584      591       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jfrazierRH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@jfrazierRH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 10, 2024

@jfrazierRH: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-presubmits-pr-rosa-hcp-advanced 63bc0fe link false /test e2e-presubmits-pr-rosa-hcp-advanced
ci/prow/e2e-presubmits-pr-rosa-sts-advanced 63bc0fe link false /test e2e-presubmits-pr-rosa-sts-advanced

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants