Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Prepare a draft of the OSLC Core changes summary #297

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Prepare a draft of the OSLC Core changes summary #297

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

berezovskyi
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@axelreichwein
Copy link
Member

when you say: "primary goal of OSLC Core 3.0 was upwards compatibility with OSLC 2.0" -> you probably mean backwards compatibility with OSLC 2.0?

@axelreichwein axelreichwein reopened this Sep 10, 2021
axelreichwein
axelreichwein previously approved these changes Sep 10, 2021
View reviewed changes
@berezovskyi
Copy link
Member Author

@axelreichwein I agree this sounds wrong. As per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_compatibility, we don't expect OSLC 2 servers to accept LDP-rich input crafted for OSLC 3 servers.

@jamsden could you please check this and edit this PR as necessary? Web edits can be done via https://github.com/oslc-op/website/edit/b-oslc-core-os/content/news/2021/oslc-core-os.md?pr=%2Foslc-op%2Fwebsite%2Fpull%2F297

Thanks to both of you!

@jamsden
Copy link
Member

jamsden commented Sep 13, 2021 via email •
edited by berezovskyi
Loading

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Member Author

@jamsden @axelreichwein do we still want to publish this as a blog post? I would like to publish it before the OSLCfest. Core PN will take us 2-3 weeks to get out.

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Member Author

@jamsden strange we never published this. Should we go ahead?

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Member Author

I now recall we were waiting for the PN publication.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@axelreichwein axelreichwein axelreichwein left review comments

@jamsden jamsden Awaiting requested review from jamsden

@jadelkhoury jadelkhoury Awaiting requested review from jadelkhoury

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@berezovskyi @axelreichwein @jamsden