Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tests-only] [full-ci] Demo ci with user keys encryption #319

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor

@phil-davis phil-davis commented Jan 2, 2022

Like #311

Related issue #320

See if those local storage tests pass or fail here in the encryption repo.

@phil-davis phil-davis self-assigned this Jan 2, 2022
@phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor Author

#320 (comment)

https://drone.owncloud.com/owncloud/encryption/2254/55/13

See the issue - local storage tests are failing with user-key encryption.

@phil-davis phil-davis force-pushed the ci-with-user-keys-encryption-2022-01 branch from bb9f431 to 7119e38 Compare January 7, 2022 04:25
@phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor Author

I rebased and forced pushed to get fresh CI.
Probably #321 will also fail with user-key encryption. Let's see.

@phil-davis phil-davis force-pushed the ci-with-user-keys-encryption-2022-01 branch from 7119e38 to fb613bc Compare January 28, 2022 03:40
@phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor Author

rebased to get updated CI result.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor Author

See PR #331 for an up-to-date run of this.

@phil-davis phil-davis closed this Mar 22, 2022
@phil-davis phil-davis deleted the ci-with-user-keys-encryption-2022-01 branch March 22, 2022 06:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant