[#IOCOM-504] Enable canary for messages from view. #683
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Garma00
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2023
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
gquadrati
approved these changes
Sep 27, 2023
michaeldisaro
added
status: apply in progress
status: applied
and removed
status: apply in progress
labels
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
List of changes
Moved FF to canary users, and made a regex that takes 0.4% of fiscal codes in production
Motivation and context
We need to reach the whole user base in taking messages from the view calculated from fn-messages-cqrs.
After a year testing with betatesters we are ready to move to canary users.
Type of changes
Env to apply
Does this introduce a change to production resources with possible user impact?
Enabling canary users increases the impact of our tests, if something goes wrong will go back to betatester.
Does this introduce an unwanted change on infrastructure? Check terraform plan execution result