-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some relayer improvments #2902
Merged
Merged
Some relayer improvments #2902
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a70bdd8
added CLI arguments: full WS URI + separate for WS path URI component…
svyatonik 8c00c87
Merge branch 'polkadot-staging' into sv-some-relayer-improvements
svyatonik 06a78bb
URI -> URL?
svyatonik 5b03942
Merge branch 'sv-some-relayer-improvements' of https://github.com/par…
svyatonik 4903da3
added TODO
svyatonik 62a5bd3
fmt
svyatonik File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we mark
host
,port
,path
andsecure
as deprecated in order to not forget about them ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO there's no much point in deprecating this in code - it'll only propagate to multiple
#[allow(deprecated)]
attributes across the code and end-users (those who run relays) won't see it anyway. I've just tried to find something deprecation-related in the clap/structopt to deprecate arguments instead, but there's nothing for that. And I don't want to remove arguments right now, because we have several relayers running && it'll take some time to propagate this change there. I could add a suffix to associated CLI arguments: "Deprecated: use uri instead" as a compromise. WDYT?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, makes sense.
I don't know if it's necessary. We can leave it as it is. At most we can add a TODO comment, just to make sure we don't forget about it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've filed #2909 to track it