Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Always redirect STDOUT to logfile #19

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: integration
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

amalek215
Copy link
Contributor

When run as a systemd process without the --daemon flag the print statements that implicitly use STDOUT do not make it into the logfile

bin/pgaudit_analyze Show resolved Hide resolved
@dwsteele dwsteele self-requested a review May 11, 2021 13:36
@dwsteele dwsteele self-assigned this May 11, 2021
@dwsteele dwsteele changed the base branch from master to integration July 2, 2021 13:39
Alex Malek and others added 7 commits July 22, 2021 09:58
When testing on the CentOS8 Stream OS and trying to run the pgaudit_analyze binary as a daemon over an SSH connection, the entire SSH connection would hang and never return. After a lot of investigation, we were able to determine that this was happening when using openssh 8.0p1-9.el8 and also 8.0p1-8.el8. However, when you downgrade openssh to 8.0p1-7.el8, launching the daemon works as it has in the past. After digging through the openssh commits we found this:

On May 2, 2021, CentOS 8 Stream packagers introduced a change to its openssh libraries, which you can see here: https://git.centos.org/rpms/openssh/c/1c3003998fcc4d40fe9e4544bca70dbc03324e65?branch=c8s

After a lot more digging and testing, the issue was related to the fact that STDERR was never closed so in the newer openssh versions it would not release the connection and would hang. After this change we are able to run the pgaudit_analyze daemon over an SSH connection like before.
# Conflicts:
#	bin/pgaudit_analyze
Copy link
Collaborator

@dwsteele dwsteele left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tweaked the comments/code in 3138768 and a52863f. This is ready to merge if the changes look OK to you.

@amalek215
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not sure if this paused waiting from a response from me.
I had initially commented "Looks good!" on the original commit you had asked for a comment on but now not seeing it in this PR log / convo

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants