Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ability to remove a resolved async node #404
Ability to remove a resolved async node #404
Changes from 4 commits
50591e0
12f9d46
9e27f2d
ac7fec1
a198f1f
fc73d00
b95b53d
49a4d1d
db383d8
6764f0d
43e0edb
0030479
5c556c9
3bb57e1
c0d9dff
8403522
6cd0a7f
428a217
44f5bca
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this not checking for something out of bounds?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
since
view
is just a record, and the value ofactions
can be of typeany
, could you getactions[2]
being undefined butactions[3]
being well defined? If so, does it make more sense to check size rather thanactions[2]
specificallyThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean I think we shouldn't check for
view?.actions[2]
at all because there's no significance to itThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Anyhow view?.actions[2] would be undefined , but yes as you said it makes no sense checking for this at this point of time as view?.actions[2] is not expected at all. Removed it
Check warning on line 157 in plugins/async-node/core/src/index.ts
Codecov / codecov/patch
plugins/async-node/core/src/index.ts#L152-L157
Check warning on line 193 in plugins/async-node/core/src/index.ts
Codecov / codecov/patch
plugins/async-node/core/src/index.ts#L192-L193