product dropdown improvements #122
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the 📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for plural-marketing ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/menu/Menu.tsx (1)
308-308: Consider adding max-width constraintWhile
width: 'max-content'ensures the dropdown fits its content, consider adding amax-widthconstraint to prevent potential layout issues with very wide content.const DropdownCardSC = styled.div<{ $kind: string }>(({ theme, $kind }) => ({ overflowX: 'hidden', overflowY: 'auto', - width: 'max-content', + width: 'max-content', + maxWidth: '90vw', // Prevent extremely wide dropdowns padding: $kind === 'product' ? theme.spacing.xlarge : `${theme.spacing.xsmall}px 0`,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
src/generated/graphqlDirectus.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/Navigation.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/menu/Menu.tsx(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/components/Navigation.tsx (3)
167-167: LGTM: Padding adjustment aligns with design changes
The reduction in horizontal padding complements the width constraints and appears to be part of the intended design improvements.
46-46: Verify responsive behavior with fixed width
The fixed width of 440px might cause layout issues on smaller screens. Consider using responsive width or max-width constraints.
✅ Verification successful
Fixed width is appropriate for this design
The width of 440px is intentionally used for the product dropdown menu and appears to be part of a responsive design system. The codebase shows:
- A well-defined breakpoints system (
src/breakpoints.ts) with multiple responsive breakpoints - Media queries handling different screen sizes throughout the codebase
- The width is used in a dropdown menu context, which commonly has fixed widths for consistent layout
The fixed width is appropriate here as:
- It's used in a dropdown menu where consistent width improves usability
- The parent component can handle overflow appropriately
- The codebase has proper responsive design patterns in place
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for responsive handling or media queries for this width
rg -A 3 "440" --type css --type typescript
rg -A 3 "width" --type css --type typescript
Length of output: 157
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for responsive handling or media queries for this width
rg -A 3 "440"
rg -A 3 "@media.*width"
Length of output: 36730
57-65: Verify new text style definitions
The text styles have been updated to use mComponentLink and mComponentText. These appear to be design system changes.
src/components/menu/Menu.tsx (2)
224-228: LGTM! Clean implementation of conditional grid layout
The grid layout for product features with appropriate spacing improves the organization and readability of the menu items.
211-211: Consider content overflow handling with max-height constraint
The addition of max-h-[120px] might truncate content on smaller screens. Consider adding overflow handling or ensuring the content always fits within this constraint.
| ? 'flex flex-col items-center gap-large min-[1352px]:flex-row' | ||
| : '' | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Custom breakpoint min-[1352px] deviates from the design system
The codebase has a well-defined breakpoint system in src/breakpoints.ts with standardized values:
lg: 1000pxxl: 1280pxxxl: 1440px
The custom breakpoint min-[1352px] falls between xl and xxl breakpoints and doesn't align with the design system. Consider using either xl (1280px) or xxl (1440px) for better consistency.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the custom breakpoint value consistency
The change from lg:flex-row to min-[1352px]:flex-row introduces a specific pixel breakpoint. Ensure this breakpoint (1352px) aligns with the design system's breakpoint standards.
Let me gather more specific information about the breakpoints defined in the system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances of this breakpoint to verify consistency
rg --type tsx --type ts "1352px|min-\[1352px\]"
# Look for any breakpoint definitions in theme files
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js theme | xargs rg "breakpoint"
Length of output: 5144
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the breakpoints.ts file content to understand the defined breakpoints
cat src/breakpoints.ts
# Check the theme configuration
cat tailwind.config.ts
Length of output: 3548
jsladerman
force-pushed
the
jake/prod-2898-dropdown-improvements
branch
from
3e5bf88 to
3e053b5
Compare
jsladerman
force-pushed
the
jake/prod-2898-dropdown-improvements
branch
from
3e053b5 to
f78596b
Compare
per designs
also shrinks the cookiebot dialog a bit on smaller screens since it was too intrusive (closes PROD-2909)