-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[LoadTesting] Test tokenomics actors balances. #921
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…Invalid_SupplierExceedsMaxClaimableAmount
…_pokt_reimbursement_request
…_pokt_reimbursement_request
|
GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
12819930 | Triggered | Generic Password | ba13177 | localnet/kubernetes/values-pocketdex-postgres.yaml | View secret |
12819930 | Triggered | Generic Password | 5ad3b28 | localnet/kubernetes/observability-prometheus-stack.yaml | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secrets safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate these secrets.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
// account for GMI | ||
mintUPOKT := s.getGlobalInflationMintedUPOKT(settledUPOKT) | ||
|
||
// TODO_IN_THIS_PR: Should check with multiple supplier owners |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[linter-name (fail-on-found)] reported by reviewdog 🐶
// TODO_IN_THIS_PR: Should check with multiple supplier owners
Summary
This PR tests the tokenomics correct tokens distribution by:
Issue
Type of change
Select one or more from the following:
consensus-breaking
label if so. See [Infra] Automatically add theconsensus-breaking
label #791 for detailsTesting
make docusaurus_start
; only needed if you make doc changesmake go_develop_and_test
make test_e2e
devnet-test-e2e
label to the PR.Sanity Checklist