Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Slashable deposit, purchaser reputation, and reserved cores for Broker pallet #88

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ltfschoen
Copy link

No description provided.


* Collectors (e.g. purchase a significant core such as the first core that is sold just to increase their likelihood of receiving an NFT airdrop for being one of the first purchasers).
* Resellers (e.g. purchase a core that may be used at a popular period of time to resell closer to the date to realise a profit)
* Market makers (e.g. buy cores just to change the floor price or volume).
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

people can do that, but it is expensive. The system is designed so that you need to invest more than you create cost for others. You can also not directly create profit out of that as the sales on the primary market get burnt. You can achieve higher prices on secondary markets, but you yourself also paid more on the primary market.

The only real small issue is with renewals. If price goes too low, people could start hoarding cores and keep renewing them, because it is cheap enough. Given that you can not do anything with a core that is eligible for renewal except running a particular parachain on it forever, this is still just cost without any benefit, if you don't actually need to run a parachain, as you can not resell such a core.

@anaelleltd anaelleltd added the Stale Is no longer pursued. label Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Stale Is no longer pursued.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants