Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: More ways to specify R path #64
feat: More ways to specify R path #64
Changes from 3 commits
af9b2ad
48b7637
d195e75
d0f4096
1e27ec5
37b2763
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just out of curiosity, not asking for a change... Is this all equivalent to
globalThis.acquirePositronApi?()
? (Other than you're gracefully dealing withglobalThis
not being an object andacquirePositronApi
not being a function, both of which seem unlikely?)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean
globalThis?.acquirePositronApi()
, right? Then yes, it's equivalent if overly cautious. I'm happy to switch to the cleaner syntax.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmmm, I don't think that's right... I think
globalThis?.
checks forglobalThis
being null/undefined but notacquirePositronApi
. It looks to me like?()
is not a thing, I think maybe the original is best.Or
Or
(Bikeshedding so hard right now... sorry... 😬)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or
(Alright I'm done, I promise!)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh yeah, that's right. I think this is pretty succinct and brings in the right ideas:
This file was deleted.
Check warning on line 363 in src/run.ts
GitHub Actions / build-vsix