Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Complete iceberg support for time type #24091

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

auden-woolfson
Copy link
Contributor

@auden-woolfson auden-woolfson commented Nov 19, 2024

Description

Bringing this functionality from IBM's repository. Added support for partitioning over the time type in orc files through the iceberg connector

== RELEASE NOTES ==

General Changes
* Add support for time type partitioning in the orc file format for iceberg :pr:`24091`
* Add testing for partitioning using time type in iceberg :pr:`24091`

@auden-woolfson auden-woolfson added the from:IBM PR from IBM label Nov 19, 2024
@ethanyzhang ethanyzhang requested review from a team and ScrapCodes and removed request for a team November 21, 2024 06:03
sdruzkin
sdruzkin previously approved these changes Nov 23, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@sdruzkin sdruzkin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ORC changes look good.

@@ -186,6 +196,8 @@ private Block readNullBlock(boolean[] isNull, int nonNullCount)
throw new VerifyError("Unsupported type " + type);
}

protected void maybeTransformValues(long[] values, int nextBatchSize) {}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually I don't think we do here... just took this directly from the IBM code. Will push version without it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
from:IBM PR from IBM
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants