Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add major-minor-release workflow #45
base: unstable/v1
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add major-minor-release workflow #45
Changes from 1 commit
e34653e
b78d2e9
5baaafc
54e3ca6
5fbbe92
1ef704e
bf26813
aabe83c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Honestly, I'm lately preferring the
create
event because it has closer semantics to what we're attempting to trigger. But using it requires a post-condition.WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mostly use
push
due to sheer habit, there were a lot fewer triggers (at least in the docs) when I started adopting gh-actions as soon as they came out of beta.The docs are kinda unclear on how to use it, would simply changing
push
forcreate
work? Or what is the proper pattern, only to trigger on tags that start withv
I guess semantically the closes would be to use
release
.I use this trigger for my actions and it works fine, but I'm not sure how this will play out with
dev
,pre
andpost
tags, since those will most likely not published.The other
release
type to use would becreated
, which wouldn't force one to release on the markedplace, but it could still happen by accident (I think to remember that the checkbox is checked by default after fist publishing).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The usage of
create
isIt's
(because it doesn't have "native" filters)
I usually create the tags using local Git and push them from CLI. And only after that I publish releases. So I'm not sure if
release
would be suitable. OTOH this workflow could auto-publish a release on tag creation. You already have a way of saying if the "pre-release" checkbox should be set.Also, I'm fine with publishing pre-releases to Marketplace. I've done it before.
See https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/releases/tag/v1.0.0a0 — it has a pre-release checkbox. And it's marketplace page https://github.com/marketplace/actions/pypi-publish?version=v1.0.0a0 also has a pre-release marker, just like PyPI.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think auto-publishing is a bit too much automation since the release messages often need some handcrafted work. e.g. markdown formatting, which can't be extracted from the tag.
As for the
published
event, I don't know how github determines what the current release is, my guess is that it sorts them by published date. If that assumption is correct apost
release could mess up what version is displayed on the marketplace. E.g. you have av2.0.0
release and after that releasev1.4.1.post0
to trigger the workflow,v1.4.1.post0
might be shown a current version. So IMHO[created, edited]
would be closer to the desired behavior.Also using
release
would make it more reasonable to add a link to the release to the created tags (see #45 (comment)).As for the semantics of
create
vs.push
, I think this boils down to different reference systemsremote
vs.locally
(sorry physics student here 😆 ).I personally prefer the more concise syntax of
push
, wheregives you the same functionality as
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure about the markdown part. First of all, it's possible to have tag annotations with markdown baked-in but I wouldn't care about it too much: when you mark a release as published to the Marketplace, the new version appears there but the release description does not show up there. Instead, it just contains README content.
So it's okay to just auto-publish and then, if needed, I'd just correct it.
FWIW we shouldn't care about ordering the tags: it'll be like this regardless of whether a robot or a human makes the release... And we're not going to avoid putting
.post
tags on the marketplace while moving the major tag there in Git.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess it's time to bump this