Eventmanager #1714
Eventmanager #1714
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| "", | ||
| emtypes.EventTypeICQQueryDelegation, | ||
| emtypes.EventStatusActive, | ||
| nil, // TODO: maybe delegation/valoper? |
Check notice
Code scanning / devskim
A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
| "", | ||
| emtypes.EventTypeICQQueryDelegation, | ||
| emtypes.EventStatusActive, | ||
| nil, // TODO: maybe delegation/valoper? |
Check notice
Code scanning / devskim
A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
WalkthroughThe recent updates enhance the event management capabilities within the Quicksilver application, integrating an Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant A as User
participant B as App
participant C as EventManagerKeeper
A->>B: Trigger Event (e.g., Delegation)
B->>C: Log Event
C->>C: Process Event
C->>B: Event Completed
B->>A: Notify User
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
| EventStatusPending = int32(2) | ||
|
|
||
| EventTypeUnspecified = int32(0x00) | ||
| EventTypeICQQueryRewards = int32(0x01) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These probably ought to exist elsewhere.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
e.g. their own modules. EM should have no concept of these.
| for _, sub := range k.PrSubmodules { | ||
| sub.Hooks(ctx, k) | ||
| } |
Check warning
Code scanning / CodeQL
Iteration over map
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (22)
x/eventmanager/types/codec.go (1)
15-16: Implement or remove theRegisterLegacyAminoCodecfunction.The
RegisterLegacyAminoCodecfunction is currently empty. If it's not needed, consider removing it; otherwise, implement the necessary registration logic.proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/query.proto (1)
19-27: Consider adding field comments for better documentation.Adding comments to the fields in
QueryEventsRequestandQueryEventsResponsecan improve the readability and maintainability of the proto file.message QueryEventsRequest { // Pagination defines the pagination for the request. cosmos.base.query.v1beta1.PageRequest pagination = 1; // Chain ID specifies the chain for which events are queried. string chain_id = 2; } message QueryEventsResponse { // Events holds the list of queried events. repeated Event events = 1 [(gogoproto.nullable) = false]; // Pagination defines the pagination for the response. cosmos.base.query.v1beta1.PageResponse pagination = 2; }x/eventmanager/keeper/grpc_query.go (1)
42-44: Ensure error messages do not expose sensitive informationThe use of
err.Error()instatus.Error(codes.Internal, err.Error())could potentially expose sensitive information if the error message contains such data. This pattern is found in several files:
x/eventmanager/keeper/grpc_query.gox/airdrop/keeper/grpc_query.gox/interchainstaking/keeper/grpc_query.gox/claimsmanager/keeper/grpc_query.gox/interchainquery/keeper/grpc_query.gox/epochs/keeper/grpc_query.goConsider reviewing these instances to ensure that sensitive information is not inadvertently exposed in error messages.
Analysis chain
Handle potential internal errors gracefully.
The error returned by
FilteredPaginateis wrapped withcodes.Internal. Ensure that any sensitive information is not exposed in the error message.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling for sensitive information exposure. # Test: Check for error wrapping practices in the codebase. rg --type go 'status.Error(codes.Internal' -A 5Length of output: 140
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling for sensitive information exposure. # Test: Check for error wrapping practices in the codebase. rg --type go 'status\.Error\(codes\.Internal' -A 5Length of output: 4052
x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper.go (2)
35-42: Avoid overwriting existing callbacks.The
SetCallbackHandlermethod prevents overwriting existing callbacks by checking if a callback is already set for a module. This is good practice, but consider logging this attempt for better traceability.+ k.Logger(ctx).Info("Attempt to overwrite callback handler", "module", module)
49-60: Handle unknown callback IDs gracefully.The
Callmethod returns an error if a callback ID is not found. Consider logging this error for better debugging and operational monitoring.+ k.Logger(ctx).Error("Callback not found", "module", moduleName, "callbackID", callbackID)proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/genesis.proto (2)
11-25: Consider using more descriptive field names.The
Eventmessage uses generic field names likeevent_typeandevent_status. Consider using more descriptive names or adding comments to clarify their purpose and possible values.// Possible values: 0 = unspecified, 1 = started, 2 = completed int32 event_status = 4;
30-37: Clarify enum values with comments.The
FieldOperatorenum values could benefit from comments explaining their use cases, which would improve readability and maintainability.// FIELD_OPERATOR_EQUAL checks if the field value is equal to the specified value. FIELD_OPERATOR_EQUAL = 1;x/interchainstaking/keeper/events.go (1)
30-35: Improve error message clarity.The error message in the
Callmethod could be more descriptive by including the context of the error.- return fmt.Errorf("callback %s not found", id) + return fmt.Errorf("callback with ID %s not found in EventCallbacks", id)x/eventmanager/types/conditions.go (7)
11-14: Add documentation forEMKeeperinterface.Consider adding comments to describe the purpose and usage of the
EMKeeperinterface. This will enhance understandability and maintainability.// EMKeeper defines the expected interface for the Event Manager Keeper.
16-19: Add documentation forConditionIinterface.Adding comments to describe the
ConditionIinterface will improve code readability and maintainability.// ConditionI represents a condition that can be resolved to a boolean value.
21-32: Consider adding comments toCanExecutefunction.The
CanExecutefunction lacks comments explaining its purpose and logic. Adding a brief description will improve clarity.// CanExecute checks if the event can be executed based on its condition.
49-63: Consider adding comments toConditionAll.Resolvefunction.Adding comments to describe the logic of the
Resolvefunction inConditionAllwill enhance readability.// Resolve checks if all field values of the condition are resolved.
70-91: Consider adding comments toConditionAnd.Resolvefunction.Adding comments to describe the logic of the
Resolvefunction inConditionAndwill enhance readability.// Resolve checks if both conditions are resolved to true.
105-126: Consider adding comments toConditionOr.Resolvefunction.Adding comments to describe the logic of the
Resolvefunction inConditionOrwill enhance readability.// Resolve checks if at least one of the conditions is resolved to true.
144-172: Consider adding comments toConditionCount.Resolvefunction.Adding comments to describe the logic of the
Resolvefunction inConditionCountwill enhance readability.// Resolve checks if the count of resolved field values matches the comparator condition.x/participationrewards/keeper/hooks.go (2)
31-31: Improve error logging.Consider providing more context in the error log message to aid in debugging. For example, include the data or index that caused the unmarshalling error.
- k.Logger(ctx).Error("Error unmarshalling protocol data") + k.Logger(ctx).Error("Error unmarshalling protocol data", "data", data, "index", index)
95-96: Clarify event purpose in comments.The comment should clearly describe the purpose and conditions of the event being added. This improves code readability and maintenance.
- // add event to ensure submodule hooks are called when the validator_performance and get_epoch_height calls have returned. + // Add an event to trigger submodule hooks once the validator_performance and get_epoch_height conditions are satisfied.x/interchainstaking/types/zones.go (1)
Line range hint
1-1:
Consider documenting changes.Document the architectural changes regarding withdrawal management in the project documentation to ensure clarity for future developers.
## Withdrawal Management Changes The withdrawal waitgroup methods have been removed from the `Zone` struct. Ensure to update any related documentation or guides to reflect this change.x/eventmanager/keeper/events_test.go (2)
149-211: Clarify test scenarios.Ensure that the
TestEventLifecycleWithCondition2function clearly documents the scenarios being tested, especially complex condition interactions.// TestEventLifecycleWithCondition2 verifies complex condition interactions during event lifecycle.
102-147: Improve condition testing coverage.The current test suite in
events_test.gocoversNewConditionAllandNewConditionAnd, but it lacks tests forNewConditionOrandNewConditionCount. To ensure robustness, consider adding tests for these condition combinations.
- Add tests for
NewConditionOrto verify scenarios where any condition can satisfy the requirement.- Add tests for
NewConditionCountto check scenarios involving count-based conditions.Analysis chain
Improve condition testing.
The
TestEventLifecycleWithConditionfunction tests event conditions. Ensure that all possible condition combinations are tested for robustness.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the condition combinations in tests. # Test: Search for condition tests. Expect: Comprehensive testing of combinations. rg 'NewCondition' -A 5Length of output: 12176
x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions.go (2)
499-502: Placeholder HandleMaturedUnbondings method added.The placeholder for
HandleMaturedUnbondingsindicates potential future functionality. Ensure this is tracked for future development.+ // TODO: Implement functionality for handling matured unbondings.
173-177: Update calls toHandleQueuedUnbondingsto match the new signature.The method
HandleQueuedUnbondingshas been updated to includechainId,epoch, andrateas parameters. However, some calls to this method still use the old signature and need to be updated:
x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go: Calls toHandleQueuedUnbondingsdo not include therateparameter.x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions_test.go: Calls toHandleQueuedUnbondingsdo not include therateparameter.Please ensure all invocations are updated to match the new method signature.
Analysis chain
Correctly updated HandleQueuedUnbondings method signature.
The
HandleQueuedUnbondingsmethod now takeschainIdandrateas parameters, which improves flexibility. Ensure that all calls to this method are updated accordingly.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `HandleQueuedUnbondings` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'HandleQueuedUnbondings'Length of output: 4078
Tools
GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 173-173:
ST1003: method parameter chainId should be chainID (stylecheck)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
go.work.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumx/eventmanager/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/eventmanager/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/eventmanager/types/query.pb.gw.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.go
Files selected for processing (50)
- app/keepers/keepers.go (7 hunks)
- app/keepers/keys.go (2 hunks)
- app/modules.go (7 hunks)
- app/upgrades.go (2 hunks)
- app/upgrades/types.go (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.yml (2 hunks)
- proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/query.proto (1 hunks)
- scripts/simple-test.sh (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/keeper/abci.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/keeper/events.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/keeper/events_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/keeper/grpc_query.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/module.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/types/callbacks.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/types/codec.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/types/conditions.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/types/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/types/resolver.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go (10 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks_test.go (13 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation.go (6 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/events.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/hooks.go (6 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go (20 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go (13 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper.go (4 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions.go (8 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/validators.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/types/expected_keepers.go (3 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/types/zones.go (2 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/types/zones_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/allocations.go (1 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/callbacks.go (8 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution.go (2 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/events.go (1 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/hooks.go (4 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/keeper.go (4 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection.go (8 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection_test.go (19 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_liquid.go (1 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosis.go (2 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_umee.go (6 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/types/expected_keepers.go (2 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/types/participationrewards.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- app/upgrades/types.go
- scripts/simple-test.sh
- x/interchainstaking/types/zones_test.go
- x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_liquid.go
Additional context used
Learnings (2)
x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go (1)
Learnt from: joe-bowman PR: quicksilver-zone/quicksilver#1183 File: x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go:713-717 Timestamp: 2024-02-23T17:42:14.272Z Learning: The error handling strategy of logging errors without halting execution or propagating them further in the context of decrementing the withdrawal waitgroup is intentional and considered appropriate by the developers.x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go (6)
Learnt from: joe-bowman PR: quicksilver-zone/quicksilver#1099 File: x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go:1447-1447 Timestamp: 2024-02-01T16:47:24.064Z Learning: The user has clarified that in the context of testing failure cases for unbondings, it is expected that withdrawal records will be marked as `requeued`.Learnt from: joe-bowman PR: quicksilver-zone/quicksilver#1099 File: x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go:1280-1280 Timestamp: 2024-02-01T16:47:17.277Z Learning: The user has clarified that in the context of testing failure cases for unbondings, it is expected that withdrawal records will be marked as `requeued`.Learnt from: joe-bowman PR: quicksilver-zone/quicksilver#1099 File: x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go:1427-1427 Timestamp: 2024-02-01T16:47:12.801Z Learning: The user has clarified that in the context of testing failure cases for unbondings, it is expected that withdrawal records will be marked as `requeued`.Learnt from: joe-bowman PR: quicksilver-zone/quicksilver#1099 File: x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go:1437-1437 Timestamp: 2024-02-01T16:47:22.155Z Learning: In the context of testing failure cases for unbondings, it is expected that withdrawal records will be marked as `requeued`.Learnt from: joe-bowman PR: quicksilver-zone/quicksilver#1099 File: x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go:1220-1220 Timestamp: 2024-01-30T14:35:03.865Z Learning: In the context of testing failure cases for unbondings, it is expected that withdrawal records will be marked as `requeued`.Learnt from: joe-bowman PR: quicksilver-zone/quicksilver#1099 File: x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go:1220-1220 Timestamp: 2024-01-30T14:38:08.842Z Learning: In the context of testing failure cases for unbondings, it is expected that withdrawal records will be marked as `requeued`.
GitHub Check: CodeQL
x/participationrewards/keeper/events.go
[warning] 80-82: Iteration over map
Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
GitHub Check: lint
x/participationrewards/keeper/events.go
[failure] 87-87:
Error return value ofk.AllocateHoldingsRewardsis not checked (errcheck)x/interchainstaking/types/expected_keepers.go
[failure] 5-5:
redundant-import-alias: Import alias "time" is redundant (revive)x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions.go
[failure] 173-173:
ST1003: method parameter chainId should be chainID (stylecheck)
[failure] 195-195:
commentFormatting: put a space between//and comment text (gocritic)
[failure] 467-467:
ST1003: method parameter chainId should be chainID (stylecheck)
GitHub Check: devskim
x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go
[notice] 1210-1210: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious comment
[notice] 1249-1249: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious comment
Additional comments not posted (169)
proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/query.proto (1)
11-16: Ensure consistency in HTTP endpoint naming.The HTTP endpoint
/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/events/{chain_id}is well-defined. Ensure consistency in endpoint naming across your API to maintain clarity and ease of use.x/participationrewards/types/keys.go (1)
25-30: Ensure key prefixes are well-documented and used consistently.The introduction of new key prefixes is a positive change for managing protocol data. Ensure these prefixes are documented and used consistently across the codebase to prevent confusion.
x/eventmanager/keeper/grpc_query.go (1)
29-41: Consider optimizing the pagination and filtering logic.The
FilteredPaginatefunction is used to paginate and filter events. Ensure that this approach is efficient for large datasets. Consider using indexed fields for filtering if performance becomes an issue.x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper_test.go (2)
15-17: Ensure proper initialization of the testing app.The
initfunction setsDefaultTestingAppInittoapp.SetupTestingApp. Verify thatSetupTestingAppcorrectly initializes all necessary components for testing.Verification successful
SetupTestingApp is properly initializing the testing application. The
SetupTestingAppfunction inapp/test_helpers.gosets up a newQuicksilverapplication with necessary components such as a logger, database, and encoding configuration, ensuring proper initialization for testing purposes.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization logic in `SetupTestingApp`. # Test: Check the implementation of `SetupTestingApp` for completeness. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func SetupTestingApp($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of `SetupTestingApp` in the codebase to verify its presence and implementation. rg 'func SetupTestingApp' -A 10Length of output: 508
42-49: Verify the setup of test chains and paths.The
SetupTestfunction initializes the coordinator and test chains. Ensure that all required components are correctly initialized and that the setup aligns with the intended test scenarios.x/eventmanager/types/keys.go (3)
3-15: Ensure consistency in module-related constants.The constants for
ModuleName,StoreKey,RouterKey, andQuerierRouteare all set to"eventmanager". This is consistent and clear. Ensure that these constants are used consistently throughout the codebase.
51-51: Clarify the purpose ofKeyPrefixEvent.The
KeyPrefixEventis defined as a byte slice with a single element. Ensure that its usage is clear and consistent throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Purpose of
KeyPrefixEventis clear and consistent.The
KeyPrefixEventis consistently used as a prefix for creating namespaced stores in key-value storage operations, which is a common pattern for organizing data. Its usage across multiple files in thex/eventmanager/keeperpackage indicates its purpose is well-defined.
x/eventmanager/keeper/grpc_query.gox/eventmanager/keeper/events.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `KeyPrefixEvent` in the codebase. # Test: Check for the usage of `KeyPrefixEvent`. rg --type go 'KeyPrefixEvent'Length of output: 621
17-41: Verify the uniqueness and clarity of event type constants.The event type constants are defined with unique integer values. Ensure that these values do not conflict with other parts of the system and are used consistently.
Verification successful
Event Type Constants Are Unique
The event type constants in
x/eventmanager/types/keys.gohave unique integer values, ensuring there are no conflicts within this part of the system.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the uniqueness of event type constants. # Test: Check for the usage and potential conflicts of event type constants. rg --type go 'EventType' -A 5Length of output: 39482
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for duplicate event type constant values. # Extract event type constants and their values from keys.go rg --type go 'EventType' -A 0 | grep -o 'int32(0x[0-9a-fA-F]\+)' | sort | uniq -dLength of output: 81
x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper.go (1)
15-20: Ensure thread safety for callback registration.The
Keeperstruct uses a map to store callbacks, which is not thread-safe. If the Keeper is accessed concurrently, consider using async.RWMutexto protect access to thecallbacksmap.Verification successful
No concurrent access patterns found for Keeper struct. The current implementation does not show evidence of concurrent access to the
Keeperstruct. However, if future changes introduce concurrency, consider adding async.RWMutexto ensure thread safety when accessing thecallbacksmap.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the Keeper struct is accessed concurrently. # Test: Search for concurrent access patterns in the codebase. rg --type go -A 5 'Keeper' | grep -E 'go\s+|sync\.'Length of output: 382
proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/genesis.proto (1)
39-47: Ensure comprehensive comparator definitions.The
Comparatorenum defines various comparison operators. Ensure that all necessary comparators are included for your use cases, such asNOT_EQUAL.app/upgrades.go (6)
80-83: LGTM! The upgrade logic is enhanced by adding the event manager module.The addition of the
emtypes.ModuleNameto the store upgrades forV010700UpgradeNameis consistent with the introduction of the Eventmanager feature.
Line range hint
12-23: LGTM! TheGetHoldingAllocationfunction is correctly implemented.The function retrieves and unmarshals the holding allocation as expected.
Line range hint
25-30: LGTM! TheSetHoldingAllocationfunction is correctly implemented.The function marshals and sets the holding allocation as expected.
Line range hint
32-43: LGTM! TheGetValidatorAllocationfunction is correctly implemented.The function retrieves and unmarshals the validator allocation as expected.
Line range hint
45-50: LGTM! TheSetValidatorAllocationfunction is correctly implemented.The function marshals and sets the validator allocation as expected.
Line range hint
52-75: LGTM! TheDetermineAllocationsfunction is well-implemented.The function correctly calculates and sets allocations, with appropriate error handling and dust management.
x/interchainstaking/types/expected_keepers.go (1)
72-77: Ensure consistent parameter naming and usage.The methods in the
EventManagerKeeperinterface use consistent and clear parameter names. Ensure that these align with the rest of the codebase for readability and maintainability.x/interchainstaking/keeper/events.go (5)
25-27: Ensure proper initialization of the callbacks map.The
EventCallbackHandlermethod initializes thecallbacksmap. Ensure this method is called before any operations onEventCallbacksto prevent nil map errors.
72-91: Validate JSON unmarshalling and error handling.Ensure that the JSON unmarshalling in
EmitDelegatorDelegationshandles errors gracefully and that the function logic aligns with expected behavior.
93-99: Ensure zone retrieval logic is robust.The
CalculateRedemptionRatefunction retrieves a zone and triggers a redemption rate calculation. Ensure that the logic correctly handles cases where the zone is not found.
107-114: Check parameter handling in unbonding execution.The
ExecuteQueuedUnbondingsfunction should ensure that all parameters are correctly parsed and handled, especially the epoch and rate values.
116-123: Ensure consistency in unbonding distribution logic.The
DistributeUnbondingsfunction should maintain consistency with other unbonding-related functions, ensuring correct parameter usage and error handling.x/eventmanager/types/resolver.go (3)
9-21: Ensure comprehensive error handling in field resolution.The
ResolveAllFieldValuesfunction handles errors during field resolution. Ensure that all potential error cases are covered and that the function returns the correct boolean values based on the resolution results.
23-35: Validate logic for resolving any field values.The
ResolveAnyFieldValuesfunction should ensure that it correctly identifies any passing conditions and handles errors appropriately.
37-90: Correct logic for field value resolution.The
resolveFieldValuefunction should ensure that each case correctly interprets the field and operator, handling errors appropriately. Verify that the logic aligns with expected behavior for each field type.x/participationrewards/types/participationrewards.go (3)
136-136: LGTM! Change fromValidatortoValidatorScoreis consistent.The change in the
ZoneScorestruct to useValidatorScoreenhances clarity by aligning with the new focus on scoring metrics.
139-145: LGTM!ValidatorScorestruct is well-defined.The struct clearly encapsulates the performance and distribution scores, which are essential for calculating the total score.
147-148: LGTM!TotalScoremethod is correctly implemented.The method accurately sums the performance and distribution scores, providing a comprehensive score for each validator.
x/participationrewards/types/expected_keepers.go (2)
79-82: LGTM! New methods enhance data access capabilities.The addition of
GetValidatorsAsMapandGetValidatorprovides more flexible access to validator data, improving the functionality of theInterchainStakingKeeper.
85-87: LGTM!EventManagerKeeperinterface is well-defined.The methods
AddEventandMarkCompletedprovide essential capabilities for managing events, aligning with the event-driven architecture goals.x/interchainstaking/keeper/validators.go (1)
21-29: LGTM!GetValidatorsAsMapfunction is correctly implemented.The function efficiently retrieves validators as a map, enhancing quick lookups by address, which is beneficial for various data retrieval scenarios.
app/keepers/keys.go (1)
29-29: Integration ofemtypes.StoreKeylooks good!The addition of
emtypes.StoreKeyto theKVStoreKeysfunction is a logical step to integrate the event manager's store key. Ensure that this integration is correctly handled across the application.Also applies to: 65-65
Verification successful
Integration of
emtypes.StoreKeyis verified and properly handled.The
emtypes.StoreKeyis correctly added to the store keys and used in the initialization of theEventManagerKeeper, indicating proper integration of the event manager's functionality.
app/keepers/keys.go:emtypes.StoreKeyadded to store keys.app/keepers/keepers.go: Used inEventManagerKeeperinitialization.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of `emtypes.StoreKey` across the application. # Test: Search for occurrences of `emtypes.StoreKey`. Expect: Proper usage and integration. rg --type go 'emtypes.StoreKey'Length of output: 191
x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosis.go (1)
22-22: Event management integration inHookslooks good!The integration of event management logic into the
Hooksfunction enhances the module's capabilities. Ensure that the event manager handles these events correctly.Also applies to: 76-86
Verification successful
Event handling in
Hooksappears correct.The
EventTypeICQOsmosisPoolis integrated into theHooksfunction, which includes error logging and parameter management, indicating proper handling of events. Ensure that any additional event-specific logic is implemented as needed.
x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosis.go:Hooksfunction handles osmosis parameters and logs errors.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of events added in the `Hooks` function. # Test: Search for handling of `EventTypeICQOsmosisPool`. Expect: Proper event handling logic. rg --type go 'EventTypeICQOsmosisPool'Length of output: 201
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all occurrences and handling logic of `EventTypeICQOsmosisPool` in the codebase. rg 'EventTypeICQOsmosisPool' -A 5Length of output: 885
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the function or method in `x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosis.go` where `EventTypeICQOsmosisPool` is used. rg 'EventTypeICQOsmosisPool' -B 5Length of output: 934
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the function definition in `x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosis.go` where `EventTypeICQOsmosisPool` is used. rg 'func ' x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosis.go -A 10Length of output: 1021
x/participationrewards/keeper/keeper.go (3)
54-54: Addition ofEventManagerKeeperlooks good.The addition of
EventManagerKeeperto theKeeperstruct enhances its functionality for managing events. Ensure that all interactions with this keeper are correctly implemented.
Line range hint
75-100: Integration ofEventManagerKeeperinNewKeeperis appropriate.The new parameter
emkis correctly integrated into theNewKeeperfunction, ensuring that theEventManagerKeeperis properly initialized.
165-172: Change in return type ofGetModuleBalanceis valid.The change from
sdkmath.Inttosdk.Coinprovides a more comprehensive representation of the module's balance, including both amount and denomination.x/eventmanager/keeper/events.go (15)
16-18: Key generation inGenerateEventKeyis straightforward.The function correctly concatenates module, chainID, and id to generate a unique key. Consider potential issues with key collisions if inputs are not unique.
20-30: Event retrieval inGetEventis correctly implemented.The function uses a generated key to fetch the event and handles the case where the event is not found by returning a boolean flag.
32-41: Retrieving multiple events inGetEventsis well-implemented.The function iterates over prefixed events and collects them into a slice, returning the slice and its length.
43-49: Setting an event inSetEventis correctly handled.The function marshals the event and stores it using a generated key, ensuring that the event is correctly saved in the store.
51-55: Deleting an event inDeleteEventis straightforward.The function correctly deletes the event from the store using the generated key.
57-74: Iterating over prefixed events inIteratePrefixedEventsis well-implemented.The function iterates over events with a given prefix and correctly applies the callback function, allowing for custom processing of each event.
76-78: Iterating module events inIterateModuleEventsis appropriate.The function correctly uses
IteratePrefixedEventsto iterate over events for a specific module.
80-82: Iterating module chain events inIterateModuleChainEventsis correctly handled.The function uses
IteratePrefixedEventsto iterate over events for a specific module and chain, ensuring precise event handling.
84-92: Retrieving all events inAllEventsis well-implemented.The function iterates over all events in the store and collects them into a slice, ensuring comprehensive event retrieval.
94-98: Marking an event as completed inMarkCompletedis correctly implemented.The function logs the completion, deletes the event, and triggers any necessary callbacks, ensuring proper event lifecycle management.
100-118: Constructing a trigger function inGetTriggerFnis well-implemented.The function constructs a callback function that checks event status and executes callbacks if conditions are met, handling errors appropriately.
121-123: Triggering events inTriggeris correctly handled.The function iterates over events for a specific module and chain, applying the trigger function to manage event execution.
125-127: Triggering all events inTriggerAllis well-implemented.The function iterates over all events in the store and applies the trigger function, ensuring comprehensive event management.
129-145: Adding an event with expiry inAddEventWithExpiryis correctly handled.The function constructs an event with an expiry time and sets it in the store, ensuring proper event management.
147-175: Adding an event inAddEventis well-implemented.The function constructs an event with a callback and condition, correctly handling potential errors during condition processing.
x/eventmanager/module.go (8)
34-36: Implementation ofAppModuleBasicis correct.The
AppModuleBasicstruct correctly implements the required functions for basic module operations.
38-41: Initialization ofAppModuleBasicinNewAppModuleBasicis correct.The function correctly initializes the
AppModuleBasicwith the provided codec, ensuring proper setup.
68-74: Registering gRPC Gateway routes inRegisterGRPCGatewayRoutesis correctly handled.The function registers the gRPC Gateway routes and appropriately handles potential errors by panicking, which is suitable for initialization code.
90-94: Implementation ofAppModuleis correct.The
AppModulestruct correctly implements the required functions for full module operations, including simulation functions.
96-102: Initialization ofAppModuleinNewAppModuleis correct.The function correctly initializes the
AppModulewith the provided codec and keeper, ensuring proper setup.
122-126: Registering services inRegisterServicesis correctly handled.The function registers the gRPC query services using the provided configurator, ensuring proper service setup.
148-150: End block logic inEndBlockis correctly implemented.The function currently returns no validator updates, which is appropriate if no end block logic is needed.
177-180: Weighted operations inWeightedOperationsare correctly noted as absent.The function currently returns nil, with a TODO comment indicating future additions, which is acceptable for initial implementation.
x/participationrewards/keeper/hooks.go (3)
50-50: Ensure event uniqueness.When adding events, ensure that the event identifiers are unique and meaningful to avoid conflicts and improve traceability.
56-56: Ensure claims are archived correctly.Verify that the
ArchiveAndGarbageCollectClaimsfunction handles all necessary edge cases, such as empty claims or invalid data.Verification successful
Edge Cases for
ArchiveAndGarbageCollectClaimsAre Covered in TestsThe
ArchiveAndGarbageCollectClaimsfunction is implemented inx/claimsmanager/keeper/claims.goand is tested inx/claimsmanager/keeper/claims_test.go. The tests cover scenarios such as archiving with no current claims, ensuring that claims are correctly archived and cleared. This indicates that edge cases are being considered.
- Files:
x/claimsmanager/keeper/claims.go: Function implementation.x/claimsmanager/keeper/claims_test.go: Test cases for the function.The current tests appear to adequately cover the necessary edge cases.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of ArchiveAndGarbageCollectClaims. # Test: Retrieve the implementation. Expect: Proper handling of edge cases. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func ArchiveAndGarbageCollectClaims($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition or references of the ArchiveAndGarbageCollectClaims function. rg 'ArchiveAndGarbageCollectClaims' --context 5Length of output: 5215
110-117: Ensure conditions are logically sound.Verify that the logic for combining conditions is correct and aligns with the intended functionality. This is crucial for event triggering.
x/interchainstaking/types/zones.go (1)
Line range hint
1-1:
Confirm removal impact.Ensure that the removal of withdrawal waitgroup methods does not negatively impact the withdrawal process. Verify that alternative mechanisms are in place.
x/eventmanager/keeper/events_test.go (1)
68-100: Ensure test coverage is comprehensive.The
TestEventLifecyclefunction covers basic event lifecycle scenarios. Ensure that edge cases and failure scenarios are also tested.Verification successful
Comprehensive Test Coverage Verified
The additional test functions
TestEventLifecycleWithConditionandTestEventLifecycleWithCondition2provide coverage for edge cases and complex scenarios, ensuring comprehensive test coverage for the event lifecycle. These tests include conditions, multiple event types, and state verification, addressing potential edge cases and failure scenarios effectively.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the test coverage for event lifecycle. # Test: Search for additional test cases. Expect: Comprehensive coverage. rg 'TestEventLifecycle'Length of output: 320
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the contents of the additional test functions to verify their coverage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) TestEventLifecycleWithCondition() { $$$ }' -A 50 ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) TestEventLifecycleWithCondition2() { $$$ }' -A 50Length of output: 13419
x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution.go (1)
Line range hint
179-217:
Encapsulate allocation retrieval logic.The
SetZoneAllocationsfunction now retrievesholdingAllocationandvalidatorAllocationinternally, removing the need for an external parameter. This change enhances encapsulation and simplifies the function signature.
- Correctness: Ensure that
GetHoldingAllocationandGetValidatorAllocationreturn the expected values.- Logic: The function calculates the total value locked (TVL) for each zone and sets allocations proportionally. This logic appears correct, but verify that
IterateZonescorrectly updates each zone's TVL and allocations.- Error Handling: The function logs an error if the protocol TVL is zero, which is appropriate. Consider whether additional error handling or logging is needed for other potential issues.
Overall, the changes improve the function's design by centralizing allocation logic. Ensure thorough testing to confirm correctness.
x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_umee.go (5)
76-86: Add event logging for Umee reserves update.The addition of event logging for the Umee reserves update enhances observability. Ensure the event details are accurate and consistent with other logged events.
- Correctness: Verify that the event type and status are correctly set using
emtypes.EventTypeICQUmeeReservesandemtypes.EventStatusActive.- Consistency: Ensure the event logging structure is consistent across similar operations.
This change improves the module's ability to track state changes, aiding in debugging and monitoring.
110-120: Add event logging for Umee interest scalar update.Event logging for the Umee interest scalar update is correctly implemented. Ensure the event details are accurate.
- Correctness: Check that the event type
emtypes.EventTypeICQUmeeInterestScalarand statusemtypes.EventStatusActiveare appropriate.- Consistency: Maintain consistency with other event logging implementations.
This addition enhances tracking of interest scalar updates, contributing to better system observability.
143-153: Add event logging for Umee utoken supply update.The event logging for the Umee utoken supply update is implemented similarly to other events.
- Correctness: Ensure the event type
emtypes.EventTypeICQUmeeUTokenSupplyand statusemtypes.EventStatusActiveare correct.- Consistency: Verify consistency with other event logging structures.
This change aids in monitoring utoken supply changes, improving system transparency.
180-190: Add event logging for Umee leverage module balance update.Event logging for the leverage module balance update enhances observability.
- Correctness: Confirm the event type
emtypes.EventTypeICQUmeeLeverageBalanceand statusemtypes.EventStatusActiveare used correctly.- Consistency: Ensure uniformity with other event logging implementations.
This addition supports better tracking of leverage module balance changes.
214-224: Add event logging for Umee total borrows update.The event logging for total borrows update is consistent with other event logs.
- Correctness: Verify the event type
emtypes.EventTypeICQUmeeTotalBorrowsand statusemtypes.EventStatusActiveare correctly applied.- Consistency: Maintain consistency with the structure of other event logs.
This change enhances the ability to monitor total borrows updates, aiding in system management.
x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection.go (4)
19-43: Rename and enhanceQueryValidatorDelegationPerformance.The function
AllocateValidatorSelectionRewardshas been renamed toQueryValidatorDelegationPerformance, with a focus on querying rather than allocating. Event logging is added for performance tracking.
- Naming: The new name better reflects the function's purpose of querying performance.
- Logic: Ensure the logic for querying and logging is correctly implemented.
- Event Logging: The addition of event logging improves traceability.
The changes enhance clarity and functionality. Verify the integration with other components.
62-69: UpdategetZoneScoresto useValidatorScore.The
ValidatorScoresmap now holdsValidatorScoreobjects, indicating a shift towards detailed scoring.
- Correctness: Ensure the new structure accurately represents validator scores.
- Logic: Verify that
CalcDistributionScoresandCalcPerformanceScorescorrectly populate theValidatorScores.This change improves the scoring system's granularity and accuracy.
Line range hint
122-196:
RefactorCalcPerformanceScoresfor improved scoring.The function
CalcOverallScoresis renamed toCalcPerformanceScores, with changes to the scoring logic.
- Logic: The performance score is now the square of the root score, which may impact score normalization. Ensure this logic aligns with intended scoring behavior.
- Correctness: Verify that the function correctly calculates and normalizes scores.
The refactor enhances the accuracy of performance scoring. Ensure thorough testing to confirm expected outcomes.
237-238: Ensure correct usage ofTotalScore.In
CalcUserValidatorSelectionAllocations, ensure thatvs.TotalScore()is correctly used and not nil.
- Logic: Confirm that
TotalScoreis calculated and used appropriately in score calculations.- Correctness: Avoid potential nil dereference by ensuring scores are initialized.
This check ensures robustness in user allocation calculations.
Verification successful
Correct usage of
TotalScoreis ensured.The
TotalScorefunction is used with a nil check (IsNil()) before any calculations, which effectively prevents potential nil dereference issues. This ensures robustness in user allocation calculations.
- The function
TotalScoreis defined to return a sum of scores, which should not be nil unless the underlying scores are not initialized.- The presence of
IsNil()checks before usingTotalScoreconfirms that the code is handling nil values correctly.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `TotalScore` is correctly initialized and used in `CalcUserValidatorSelectionAllocations`. # Test: Search for `TotalScore` usage. Expect: No nil dereference. rg --type go 'TotalScore' -A 5Length of output: 5242
x/interchainstaking/keeper/hooks.go (2)
107-107: Ensure proper error handling forScheduleQueuedUnbondings.The
ScheduleQueuedUnbondingsfunction is called, and errors are logged but not handled further. Consider if additional error handling is necessary, especially if this could affect subsequent operations.Ensure that the error logging is sufficient for your use case and that there are no critical operations dependent on this function succeeding.
158-169: Verify the correctness of event condition creation.The creation of
delegationCondition1involves multiple field conditions. Ensure that these conditions accurately reflect the intended logic and that all necessary fields are included.Double-check the field values and logic to ensure they align with the expected event management behavior.
x/participationrewards/keeper/callbacks.go (8)
100-101: EnsureMarkCompletedis called with correct parameters.The
deferstatement inValidatorSelectionRewardsCallbackmarks the event as completed. Verify that the parameters passed toMarkCompletedaccurately reflect the event being tracked.Check that the
ChainIdand event type are correct for this callback.
144-145: Verify event type format inOsmosisPoolUpdateCallback.The event type includes the pool ID in its format. Ensure that this format is consistent with other similar event types and provides the necessary information for tracking.
Confirm that the event type format is appropriate for your event tracking needs.
216-217: Check denomination usage inUmeeReservesUpdateCallback.The event type uses the denomination derived from the query. Ensure that this denomination is correct and provides meaningful context for the event.
Verify that the denomination accurately represents the reserve being updated.
248-249: Review denomination handling inUmeeTotalBorrowsUpdateCallback.The
deferstatement uses the denomination for the event type. Ensure that this denomination is appropriate and consistent with other similar callbacks.Ensure the denomination is correctly derived and used in the event type.
280-281: Confirm denomination correctness inUmeeInterestScalarUpdateCallback.The event type includes the denomination. Verify that this denomination is accurate and relevant to the interest scalar update.
Double-check the denomination to ensure it is correct for this context.
312-313: Ensure correct denomination inUmeeUTokenSupplyUpdateCallback.The event type uses the denomination for logging. Confirm that this denomination is accurate and provides the necessary context for the event.
Check that the denomination is correctly derived and meaningful for the event.
344-345: Verify denomination usage inUmeeLeverageModuleBalanceUpdateCallback.The denomination is used in the event type. Ensure that it accurately represents the leverage module balance being updated.
Confirm that the denomination is correct and provides relevant context for the event.
372-373: CheckMarkCompletedparameters inSetEpochBlockCallback.The
deferstatement marks the event as completed. Verify that theChainIdand event type are correct for this callback.Ensure the parameters accurately reflect the event being tracked.
x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation.go (4)
197-214: Review event logging inPrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins.The method now logs events for each delegation message. Ensure that the event details, such as chain ID and event type, are correctly specified and meaningful.
Check that the event logging accurately reflects the delegation actions being performed.
221-239: Verify event logging inPrepareDelegationMessagesForShares.The method includes event logging for each message. Confirm that the event details are correct and provide useful context for tracking.
Ensure that the event logging is consistent with other similar methods and accurately represents the actions taken.
293-303: Ensure correct event logging inWithdrawDelegationRewardsForResponse.The method logs an event for each reward withdrawal. Verify that the event details are correct and meaningful for auditing purposes.
Double-check that the event type and other details accurately reflect the withdrawal actions.
375-375: Check error handling inFlushOutstandingDelegations.The method calls
handleSendToDelegateand logs the error if it occurs. Consider if additional error handling is necessary, especially if this could affect subsequent operations.Ensure that the error logging is sufficient and that any critical operations are not adversely affected by this error.
app/modules.go (7)
58-59: Correctly added imports for event manager.The imports for the
eventmanagermodule are correctly added, ensuring that the module's types and functionalities are accessible.
112-112: Event manager module correctly added to ModuleBasics.Adding
eventmanager.AppModuleBasic{}toModuleBasicsensures that the basic functionalities of the event manager are registered with the application.
175-175: Event manager module correctly added to appModules.The integration of
eventmanager.NewAppModule(appCodec, app.EventManagerKeeper)intoappModulesis appropriate, allowing the event manager to participate in the application's lifecycle.
214-214: Event manager module correctly added to simulationModules.Including the event manager in
simulationModulesensures that its functionalities are considered during simulation tests.
246-246: Event manager module correctly added to orderBeginBlockers.Adding
eventmanagertypes.ModuleNametoorderBeginBlockersensures that the event manager's begin block logic is executed in the correct order.
306-306: Event manager module correctly added to orderEndBlockers.Including
eventmanagertypes.ModuleNameinorderEndBlockersensures that the event manager's end block logic is executed in the correct order.
349-349: Event manager module correctly added to orderInitBlockers.Adding
eventmanagertypes.ModuleNametoorderInitBlockersensures that the event manager's initialization logic is executed in the correct order.x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions.go (5)
152-169: ScheduleQueuedUnbondings method correctly integrates event management.The
ScheduleQueuedUnbondingsmethod uses the event manager to schedule unbondings based on conditions. The integration appears correct and aligns with the event-driven architecture.
241-241: Optimize DeterminePlanForUndelegation call.Passing the
zoneas a pointer inDeterminePlanForUndelegationis efficient and aligns with best practices for performance optimization.
268-280: Correctly added event management for undelegate messages.The addition of event management calls for undelegate messages enhances the tracking and management of unbonding events.
284-301: Correctly added condition and event for distribute unbonding.The creation of a new condition and event for distribute unbonding is consistent with the event-driven approach and ensures proper tracking.
467-497: PayoutUnbondings method correctly handles unbonding payouts.The
PayoutUnbondingsmethod processes unbonding payouts and includes error handling for transaction submissions. This implementation enhances reliability.Tools
GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 467-467:
ST1003: method parameter chainId should be chainID (stylecheck)app/keepers/keepers.go (8)
70-71: Correctly added imports for event manager keeper.The imports for
emkeeperandemtypesare correctly added, ensuring that the event manager keeper can be utilized within the application.
115-115: EventManagerKeeper correctly added to AppKeepers.Adding
EventManagerKeeperto theAppKeepersstruct ensures that the event manager's functionalities are accessible throughout the application.
382-382: EventManagerKeeper correctly initialized in InitKeepers.The initialization of
EventManagerKeeperin theInitKeepersmethod is appropriate and ensures that the event manager is set up correctly.
396-396: Correctly integrated EventManagerKeeper with InterchainstakingKeeper.Passing
EventManagerKeepertoInterchainstakingKeeperensures that event management functionalities are available for interchain staking operations.
415-415: Correctly integrated EventManagerKeeper with ParticipationRewardsKeeper.Passing
EventManagerKeepertoParticipationRewardsKeeperensures that event management functionalities are available for participation rewards operations.
425-427: SetCallbackHandler correctly used for EventManagerKeeper.The use of
SetCallbackHandlerforEventManagerKeeperensures that it can handle events triggered by theInterchainstakingKeeper.
433-435: SetCallbackHandler correctly used for EventManagerKeeper with ParticipationRewardsKeeper.The use of
SetCallbackHandlerforEventManagerKeeperensures that it can handle events triggered by theParticipationRewardsKeeper.
548-548: Subspace for EventManager correctly added in initParamsKeeper.Creating a subspace for
EventManagerininitParamsKeeperensures that its parameters are managed within the application's configuration.x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection_test.go (15)
24-24: Update function signature in test struct.The
validatorScoresfunction in the test struct now returnsmap[string]*types.ValidatorScore. Ensure that all test cases are updated to reflect this change.
38-38: Return nil for validatorScores in "no allocation" test case.Returning
nilforvalidatorScoresis appropriate when there are no allocations expected. Ensure that this behavior is consistent with the test's purpose.
62-67: Ensure correct initialization of ValidatorScore.In the "zero weight intents, no user allocation" test case, the
ValidatorScoreis initialized with default scores. Confirm that this initialization aligns with the expected test outcomes.
93-99: Validate default scoring logic.In the "unit weight intents - default validator scores - same valopaddress" test case, the default scores are set to 1. Ensure this logic is consistent with the test's objectives.
137-143: Check scoring logic for different validators.For the "unit weight intents - default validator scores - different validators" test case, verify that the scoring logic correctly reflects the test scenario where different validators are involved.
181-187: Review weighted intents logic.In the "weighted intents - default validator scores - same validators" test case, ensure that the logic for weighted intents is correctly implemented and reflects the test's expectations.
248-248: Update function signature in test struct.The
validatorScoresfunction in the test struct now returnsmap[string]*types.ValidatorScore. Ensure that all test cases are updated to reflect this change.
269-269: Return nil for validatorScores in "zero validators" test case.Returning
nilforvalidatorScoresis appropriate when there are no validators expected. Ensure that this behavior is consistent with the test's purpose.
295-301: Ensure correct initialization of ValidatorScore.In the "zero voting power" test case, the
ValidatorScoreis initialized with default scores. Confirm that this initialization aligns with the expected test outcomes.
330-345: Validate scoring logic for different power.For the "valid zonescore, different power" test case, verify that the scoring logic correctly reflects the test scenario where validators have different voting power.
404-404: Update function signature in test struct.The
validatorScoresfunction in the test struct now returnsmap[string]*types.ValidatorScore. Ensure that all test cases are updated to reflect this change.
413-413: Return nil for validatorScores in "nil delegation rewards" test case.Returning
nilforvalidatorScoresis appropriate when there are no delegation rewards expected. Ensure that this behavior is consistent with the test's purpose.
427-427: Return nil for validatorScores in "zero total rewards" test case.Returning
nilforvalidatorScoresis appropriate when there are zero total rewards. Ensure that this behavior is consistent with the test's purpose.
450-454: Check scoring logic for validator removal.In the "validator removed from active set - performance greater than limit" test case, verify that the scoring logic correctly handles the scenario where a validator is removed from the active set.
488-500: Validate scoring logic for multiple validators.For the "multiple validators rewarded" test case, ensure that the scoring logic correctly reflects the test scenario where multiple validators are rewarded.
x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go (5)
Line range hint
72-89: Confirm callback registration.The
RegisterCallbacksfunction correctly registers all necessary callbacks using theAddCallbackmethod. Ensure that all required callbacks are included.
126-126: Verify event marking in RewardsCallback.The
MarkCompletedcall ensures that the event is marked as completed. Confirm that the event identifier and module name are correct.
132-132: Verify event marking in DelegationsEpochCallback.The
MarkCompletedcall ensures that the event is marked as completed. Confirm that the event identifier and module name are correct.
613-615: Verify event marking in DelegationAccountBalanceCallback.The
MarkCompletedcall ensures that the event is marked as completed. Confirm that the event identifier and module name are correct.
675-675: Verify event marking in DelegationAccountBalancesCallback.The
MarkCompletedcall ensures that the event is marked as completed. Confirm that the event identifier and module name are correct.x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper.go (3)
61-61: Verify addition of EventManagerKeeper to Keeper struct.The
EventManagerKeeperfield has been added to theKeeperstruct. Ensure that this addition aligns with the struct's responsibilities and intended functionality.
Line range hint
82-112: Verify integration of EventManagerKeeper in NewKeeper.The
eventManagerKeeperparameter has been added to theNewKeeperfunction. Ensure that this integration aligns with the function's responsibilities and intended functionality.
714-714: Verify event marking in UpdateRedemptionRate.The
MarkCompletedcall ensures that the event is marked as completed. Confirm that the event identifier and module name are correct.x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go (14)
33-33: Import addition is appropriate.The addition of
emtypesfor event management is appropriate given the context of the changes.
396-397: Function signature change is appropriate.The modification to return only an error simplifies error handling and aligns with Go best practices.
415-415: Function change is appropriate.The call to
handleSendToDelegatewith a memo of "rewards" is consistent with the function's purpose.
418-434: Function signature change is appropriate.The modification to return only an error simplifies error handling and aligns with Go best practices.
Line range hint
742-799: Event management integration is appropriate.The use of
EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedandEventManagerKeeper.AddEventenhances event tracking and management.
884-886: Event management integration is appropriate.The use of
EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedenhances event tracking and management.
978-980: Event management integration is appropriate.The use of
EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedenhances event tracking and management.
1027-1028: Event management integration is appropriate.The use of
EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedenhances event tracking and management.
1049-1050: Event management integration is appropriate.The use of
EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedenhances event tracking and management.
1099-1099: Event management integration is appropriate.The use of
EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedenhances event tracking and management.
Line range hint
1176-1212: Event management integration is appropriate.The use of
EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedandEventManagerKeeper.AddEventenhances event tracking and management.Tools
GitHub Check: devskim
[notice] 1210-1210: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious comment
1289-1289: Event management integration is appropriate.The use of
EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedenhances event tracking and management.
1340-1350: Event management integration is appropriate.The use of
EventManagerKeeper.AddEventenhances event tracking and management.
1356-1356: Event management integration is appropriate.The use of
EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedenhances event tracking and management.x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go (3)
4830-4831: LGTM! Ensure correct event management.The test correctly verifies that the event is removed after handling a failed delegate.
4853-4854: LGTM! Confirm expected behavior for performance addresses.The test verifies that the event is not deleted for performance delegations, which is the expected behavior.
4877-4878: LGTM! Ensure non-batch events are correctly managed.The test correctly verifies that the event is removed for non-batch delegations.
x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks_test.go (13)
Line range hint
1-4:
LGTM!The setup for the test context and zone retrieval is clear and correct.
Line range hint
1-4:
LGTM!The test setup for context and zone is correctly implemented.
Line range hint
1-5:
LGTM!The setup for the delegation total rewards query request is correctly implemented.
2494-2540: LGTM!The test cases for delegation account balances are comprehensive and well-structured.
Line range hint
1-5:
LGTM!The test setup for context and zone with previous balance is correctly implemented.
2571-2576: LGTM!The test correctly checks for events and verifies the expected count.
Line range hint
1-5:
LGTM!The test setup for context and balance assignment is correctly implemented.
Line range hint
1-5:
LGTM!The test setup for context and balance assignment is correctly implemented.
2697-2706: LGTM!The test correctly verifies the absence of specific events and checks the delegation address balance.
Line range hint
1-5:
LGTM!The test setup for validator address and balance assignment is correctly implemented.
2740-2748: LGTM!The test correctly verifies the absence of specific events and checks multiple balances.
Line range hint
1-5:
LGTM!The test setup for validator address and balance assignment is correctly implemented.
2785-2793: LGTM!The test correctly verifies the absence of specific events, checks multiple balances, and ensures the transaction count is as expected.
x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation_test.go (1)
628-628: Good practice: Addition of context parameter.The addition of the
ctxparameter to thePrepareDelegationMessagesForCoinsfunction call is a positive change, aligning with Go's best practices for context-aware operations. Ensure that the context is correctly propagated and utilized within the function to handle cancellations and timeouts effectively.x/participationrewards/keeper/allocations.go (5)
25-30: LGTM!The
SetHoldingAllocationfunction correctly marshals and sets the allocation.
32-43: Verify unmarshalling error handling.As with
GetHoldingAllocation, ensure that the use ofMustUnmarshalis appropriate or consider handling errors gracefully.
45-50: LGTM!The
SetValidatorAllocationfunction correctly marshals and sets the allocation.
52-75: Verify error handling for invalid proportions.Ensure that the error returned when proportions do not sum to one is properly handled in the calling code.
Verification successful
Error from
DetermineAllocationsis only logged.In
x/participationrewards/keeper/hooks.go, the error returned fromDetermineAllocationsis logged but not propagated or further handled. Consider whether additional error handling is necessary based on the context in which this function is used.
- Location:
x/participationrewards/keeper/hooks.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify how errors from `DetermineAllocations` are handled in the codebase. # Test: Search for `DetermineAllocations` usage and check for error handling. rg --type go $'DetermineAllocations'Length of output: 5557
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract context around the usage of DetermineAllocations in hooks.go to check error handling. rg --type go -A 10 -B 5 'DetermineAllocations' x/participationrewards/keeper/hooks.goLength of output: 642
12-23: Verify unmarshalling error handling.The
MustUnmarshalfunction is used, which will panic if unmarshalling fails. Ensure that this is the intended behavior or consider handling the error gracefully.docker-compose.yml (2)
101-101: Hermes version update approved.The Hermes service version update to
v1.8.2is likely to include bug fixes or enhancements. Ensure compatibility with other services in the deployment.
124-139: Verify impact of disabling the relayer service.Commenting out the relayer service configuration disables it. Ensure this change does not negatively impact the deployment or functionality.
| type EventCallbacks interface { | ||
| AddCallback(id string, fn interface{}) EventCallbacks | ||
| RegisterCallbacks() EventCallbacks | ||
| Call(ctx sdk.Context, id string, args []byte) error | ||
| Has(id string) bool | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding type safety for callbacks.
The AddCallback method uses interface{} for the fn parameter, which can lead to runtime errors if the function signature is incorrect. Consider using a specific function type to ensure type safety and prevent potential runtime issues.
type CallbackFunc func(ctx sdk.Context, args []byte) error
type EventCallbacks interface {
AddCallback(id string, fn CallbackFunc) EventCallbacks
// Other methods...
}| func (GenesisState) Validate() error { | ||
| return nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement validation logic for GenesisState.
The Validate method currently returns nil, which means no validation is performed. Consider implementing validation logic to ensure the integrity of the genesis state.
func (gs GenesisState) Validate() error {
// Example validation logic
if gs.SomeField == nil {
return fmt.Errorf("SomeField cannot be nil")
}
// Add more validation as needed
return nil
}| @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| import ( | |||
| "context" | |||
| time "time" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant import alias.
The import alias "time" is redundant and can be removed for clarity.
- time "time"
+ "time"Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| time "time" | |
| "time" |
Tools
GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 5-5:
redundant-import-alias: Import alias "time" is redundant (revive)
| @@ -67,3 +69,9 @@ | |||
| Grant(goCtx context.Context, msg *authz.MsgGrant) (*authz.MsgGrantResponse, error) | |||
| GetAuthorizations(ctx sdk.Context, grantee sdk.AccAddress, granter sdk.AccAddress) ([]authz.Authorization, error) | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| type EventManagerKeeper interface { | |||
| AddEvent(ctx sdk.Context, module, chainID, identifier, callback string, eventType, status int32, condtion emtypes.ConditionI, payload []byte) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typographical error in parameter name.
The parameter name condtion should be corrected to condition.
- condtion emtypes.ConditionI, payload []byte)
+ condition emtypes.ConditionI, payload []byte)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| AddEvent(ctx sdk.Context, module, chainID, identifier, callback string, eventType, status int32, condtion emtypes.ConditionI, payload []byte) | |
| AddEvent(ctx sdk.Context, module, chainID, identifier, callback string, eventType, status int32, condition emtypes.ConditionI, payload []byte) |
| conditionGetEpochHeight, err := emtypes.NewConditionAll(ctx, emtypes.NewFieldValues(emtypes.NewFieldValue(emtypes.FieldIdentifier, "get_epoch_height", emtypes.FIELD_OPERATOR_EQUAL, true)), false) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| panic(err) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // ensure we archive claims before we return! | ||
| k.icsKeeper.IterateZones(ctx, func(index int64, zone *icstypes.Zone) (stop bool) { | ||
| k.ClaimsManagerKeeper.ArchiveAndGarbageCollectClaims(ctx, zone.ChainId) | ||
| return false | ||
| }) | ||
| conditionValidatorPerformance, err := emtypes.NewConditionAll(ctx, emtypes.NewFieldValues(emtypes.NewFieldValue(emtypes.FieldIdentifier, "validator_performance", emtypes.FIELD_OPERATOR_EQUAL, true)), false) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| panic(err) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle errors gracefully.
The use of panic for error handling can lead to system crashes. Consider using proper error handling mechanisms to ensure system stability.
if err != nil {
k.Logger(ctx).Error("Failed to create conditionGetEpochHeight", "error", err)
return err
}| delegationParams := DelegatorDelegationsParams{ | ||
| ChainID: zone.ChainId, | ||
| ConnectionID: zone.ConnectionId, | ||
| Request: bz, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| delegationPayload, err := json.Marshal(&delegationParams) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider error handling for JSON marshaling.
When marshaling delegationParams to JSON, the error is handled by panicking. Consider a more graceful error handling approach, such as logging the error and returning it, to avoid crashing the application.
delegationPayload, err := json.Marshal(&delegationParams)
if err != nil {
k.Logger(ctx).Error("failed to marshal delegationParams", "error", err)
return err
}| delegationCondition, err := emtypes.NewConditionAnd( | ||
| ctx, | ||
| zone.ConnectionId, | ||
| zone.ChainId, | ||
| "cosmos.staking.v1beta1.Query/DelegatorDelegations", | ||
| bz, | ||
| sdk.NewInt(-1), | ||
| types.ModuleName, | ||
| "delegations_epoch", | ||
| 0, | ||
| delegationCondition1, | ||
| delegationCondition2, | ||
| ) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| panic(err) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential errors in condition creation.
The creation of delegationCondition using NewConditionAnd can fail, leading to a panic. Consider handling errors more gracefully by logging and returning them.
delegationCondition, err := emtypes.NewConditionAnd(ctx, delegationCondition1, delegationCondition2)
if err != nil {
k.Logger(ctx).Error("failed to create delegation condition", "error", err)
return err
}| rrCondition1, err := emtypes.NewConditionAll(ctx, | ||
| emtypes.NewFieldValues( | ||
| emtypes.FieldEqual(emtypes.FieldChainID, zone.ChainId), | ||
| emtypes.FieldEqual(emtypes.FieldModule, types.ModuleName), | ||
| emtypes.FieldEqual(emtypes.FieldEventType, fmt.Sprintf("%d", emtypes.EventTypeICAWithdrawRewards)), | ||
| ), | ||
| true, | ||
| ) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| panic(err) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review error handling for reward conditions.
The creation of rrCondition1 uses NewConditionAll, which can panic on error. Consider implementing a more robust error handling strategy.
rrCondition1, err := emtypes.NewConditionAll(ctx, emtypes.NewFieldValues(
emtypes.FieldEqual(emtypes.FieldChainID, zone.ChainId),
emtypes.FieldEqual(emtypes.FieldModule, types.ModuleName),
emtypes.FieldEqual(emtypes.FieldEventType, fmt.Sprintf("%d", emtypes.EventTypeICAWithdrawRewards)),
), true)
if err != nil {
k.Logger(ctx).Error("failed to create rrCondition1", "error", err)
return err
}| rrCondition, err := emtypes.NewConditionAnd(ctx, rrCondition1, rrCondition2) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| panic(err) | ||
| } | ||
| rrConditionAnd, err := emtypes.NewConditionAnd(ctx, rrCondition, delegationCondition) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| panic(err) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling for combined conditions.
The creation of rrConditionAnd combines multiple conditions and can panic if an error occurs. Implement a more resilient error handling approach.
rrConditionAnd, err := emtypes.NewConditionAnd(ctx, rrCondition, delegationCondition)
if err != nil {
k.Logger(ctx).Error("failed to create rrConditionAnd", "error", err)
return err
}| "", | ||
| emtypes.EventTypeICQQueryDelegation, | ||
| emtypes.EventStatusActive, | ||
| nil, // TODO: maybe delegation/valoper? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reminder: Address the TODO comment.
The TODO comment indicates incomplete functionality related to event data. Consider addressing this to ensure completeness.
Do you want me to help address this TODO or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: devskim
[notice] 1210-1210: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 31
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (13)
x/eventmanager/keeper/grpc_query.go (1)
29-41: Handle pagination and unmarshalling inEventsfunction.The pagination and unmarshalling logic is correctly implemented using
FilteredPaginate. However, consider logging errors for better traceability.if err := k.cdc.Unmarshal(value, &event); err != nil { // Consider adding logging here return false, err }proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/genesis.proto (1)
27-28: Consider Adding a Comment for Clarity.The
GenesisStatemessage is currently empty. Consider adding a comment to indicate if it's a placeholder for future state definitions.// GenesisState defines the eventmanager module's genesis state. // Currently empty, but may be expanded in the future. message GenesisState {}x/interchainstaking/types/expected_keepers.go (1)
5-5: Remove redundant import alias.The import alias "time" is redundant. You can remove the alias to simplify the import statement.
- time "time" + "time"Tools
GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 5-5:
redundant-import-alias: Import alias "time" is redundant (revive)x/interchainstaking/keeper/events.go (1)
15-21: Consider adding documentation for EventCallback and EventCallbacks.Adding comments to describe the purpose and usage of
EventCallbackandEventCallbackswould improve code readability and maintainability.// EventCallback defines the function signature for event callbacks. type EventCallback func(*Keeper, sdk.Context, []byte) error // EventCallbacks holds the keeper and a map of callback functions. type EventCallbacks struct { k *Keeper callbacks map[string]EventCallback }x/eventmanager/types/resolver.go (1)
107-134: Consider adding documentation for field value functions.Adding comments to describe the purpose and usage of functions like
NewFieldValues,FieldEqual,FieldNotEqual, etc., would improve code readability and maintainability.// NewFieldValues creates a slice of FieldValue pointers. func NewFieldValues(fields ...*FieldValue) []*FieldValue { return fields } // FieldEqual creates a FieldValue for equality comparison. func FieldEqual(field, value string) *FieldValue { return NewFieldValue(field, value, FIELD_OPERATOR_EQUAL, false) } // FieldNotEqual creates a FieldValue for inequality comparison. func FieldNotEqual(field, value string) *FieldValue { return NewFieldValue(field, value, FIELD_OPERATOR_EQUAL, true) }x/participationrewards/keeper/keeper.go (1)
75-75: Update Calls toNewKeeperwithEventManagerKeeperParameterThe call to
NewKeeperinapp/keepers/keepers.godoes not include theEventManagerKeeperparameter. Please update this call to ensure it matches the new function signature.
- File:
app/keepers/keepers.go- Line:
appKeepers.ParticipationRewardsKeeper = participationrewardskeeper.NewKeeper(...)Analysis chain
Update NewKeeper Constructor.
The
NewKeeperfunction now accepts anEventManagerKeeperparameter, ensuring that theKeeperis initialized with the necessary dependencies for event management. This change looks good, but verify that all calls toNewKeeperhave been updated accordingly.Also applies to: 100-100
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all calls to `NewKeeper` have been updated to include the `EventManagerKeeper` parameter. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: All occurrences should include the new parameter. rg --type go -A 3 $'NewKeeper'Length of output: 9728
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all calls to the specific `NewKeeper` function in `x/participationrewards/keeper/keeper.go` include the `EventManagerKeeper` parameter. # Search for calls to `NewKeeper` in the repository and filter for those related to `participationrewards`. rg --type go 'participationrewardskeeper.NewKeeper' -A 3Length of output: 358
x/eventmanager/module.go (1)
68-74: Handle Errors in RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutes.The
RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutesfunction panics on error. Consider handling errors more gracefully to improve robustness.- panic(err) + if err != nil { + log.Fatalf("Failed to register gRPC Gateway routes: %v", err) + }x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution.go (1)
Line range hint
66-162: Log errors before returning inCalcTokenValues.The function uses a multi-error approach to handle errors, but it would be beneficial to log these errors before returning to aid in debugging.
if len(errs) > 0 { k.Logger(ctx).Error("errors occurred during CalcTokenValues", "errors", errs) return nil, multierror.New(errs) }x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection.go (3)
19-23: Clarify function documentation.The function
QueryValidatorDelegationPerformancehas been renamed and its purpose is clearer now. Ensure the documentation reflects the new functionality accurately.-// QueryValidatorDelegationPerformance utilizes IBC to query the performance -// rewards account for each zone to determine validator performance and -// corresponding rewards allocations. Each zone's response is dealt with -// individually in a callback. +// QueryValidatorDelegationPerformance queries the performance rewards account +// for each zone to determine validator performance and corresponding rewards +// allocations using IBC. Each zone's response is handled individually in a callback.
Line range hint
122-134: Clarify function documentation.The documentation for
CalcPerformanceScoresshould be updated to reflect the changes in the scoring mechanism.-// CalcPerformanceScores calculates he overall validator scores for the given zone -// based on the combination of performance score and distribution score. +// CalcPerformanceScores calculates the overall validator scores for the given zone +// based on the combination of performance score and distribution score.
Line range hint
248-255: Ensure error handling forMakeRequest.The
MakeRequestfunction call does not handle errors. Consider adding error handling to ensure robustness.err := k.ICQKeeper.MakeRequest( ctx, zone.ConnectionId, zone.ChainId, "cosmos.distribution.v1beta1.Query/DelegationTotalRewards", bz, sdk.NewInt(-1), types.ModuleName, "rewards", 0, ) if err != nil { k.Logger(ctx).Error("failed to make ICQ request for rewards", "error", err) return err }x/participationrewards/keeper/callbacks.go (1)
372-376: Improve error handling inSetEpochBlockCallback.The error message could be more descriptive to aid debugging.
return fmt.Errorf("unable to find protocol data for connection with chain ID: %s", query.ChainId)x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions.go (1)
Line range hint
173-303: Fix parameter naming style.The method
HandleQueuedUnbondingsis correctly implemented, but the parameterchainIdshould be renamed tochainIDto follow Go naming conventions.-func (k *Keeper) HandleQueuedUnbondings(ctx sdk.Context, chainId string, epoch int64, rate sdk.Dec) error { +func (k *Keeper) HandleQueuedUnbondings(ctx sdk.Context, chainID string, epoch int64, rate sdk.Dec) error {
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
go.work.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumx/eventmanager/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/eventmanager/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/eventmanager/types/query.pb.gw.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.go
Files selected for processing (50)
- app/keepers/keepers.go (7 hunks)
- app/keepers/keys.go (2 hunks)
- app/modules.go (7 hunks)
- app/upgrades.go (2 hunks)
- app/upgrades/types.go (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.yml (2 hunks)
- proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/query.proto (1 hunks)
- scripts/simple-test.sh (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/keeper/abci.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/keeper/events.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/keeper/events_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/keeper/grpc_query.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/module.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/types/callbacks.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/types/codec.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/types/conditions.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/types/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
- x/eventmanager/types/resolver.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go (10 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks_test.go (13 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation.go (6 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/events.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/hooks.go (6 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go (20 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go (13 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper.go (4 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions.go (8 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/validators.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/types/expected_keepers.go (3 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/types/zones.go (2 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/types/zones_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/allocations.go (1 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/callbacks.go (8 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution.go (2 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/events.go (1 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/hooks.go (4 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/keeper.go (4 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection.go (8 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection_test.go (19 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_liquid.go (1 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosis.go (2 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_umee.go (6 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/types/expected_keepers.go (2 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/types/participationrewards.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- app/upgrades/types.go
- x/interchainstaking/types/zones_test.go
- x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_liquid.go
Additional context used
Learnings (3)
x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go (1)
Learnt from: joe-bowman PR: quicksilver-zone/quicksilver#1183 File: x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go:713-717 Timestamp: 2024-02-23T17:42:14.272Z Learning: The error handling strategy of logging errors without halting execution or propagating them further in the context of decrementing the withdrawal waitgroup is intentional and considered appropriate by the developers.x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go (3)
Learnt from: joe-bowman PR: quicksilver-zone/quicksilver#1099 File: x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go:1447-1447 Timestamp: 2024-02-01T16:47:24.064Z Learning: The user has clarified that in the context of testing failure cases for unbondings, it is expected that withdrawal records will be marked as `requeued`.Learnt from: joe-bowman PR: quicksilver-zone/quicksilver#1099 File: x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go:1427-1427 Timestamp: 2024-02-01T16:47:12.801Z Learning: The user has clarified that in the context of testing failure cases for unbondings, it is expected that withdrawal records will be marked as `requeued`.Learnt from: joe-bowman PR: quicksilver-zone/quicksilver#1099 File: x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go:1280-1280 Timestamp: 2024-02-01T16:47:17.277Z Learning: The user has clarified that in the context of testing failure cases for unbondings, it is expected that withdrawal records will be marked as `requeued`.x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks_test.go (3)
Learnt from: joe-bowman PR: quicksilver-zone/quicksilver#1132 File: x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go:625-625 Timestamp: 2024-02-10T02:09:55.471Z Learning: The `DecrementWithdrawalWaitgroup` method in `x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go` internally handles underflow protection, ensuring that the waitgroup count does not become negative.Learnt from: joe-bowman PR: quicksilver-zone/quicksilver#1132 File: x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go:127-127 Timestamp: 2024-02-10T02:09:29.887Z Learning: The `DecrementWithdrawalWaitgroup` method in `x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go` internally handles underflow protection, ensuring that the waitgroup count does not become negative.Learnt from: joe-bowman PR: quicksilver-zone/quicksilver#1132 File: x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go:662-664 Timestamp: 2024-02-13T12:59:47.985Z Learning: The `DecrementWithdrawalWaitgroup` method in `x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go` includes underflow protection, ensuring safe decrement operations.
GitHub Check: CodeQL
x/participationrewards/keeper/events.go
[warning] 80-82: Iteration over map
Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
GitHub Check: lint
x/participationrewards/keeper/events.go
[failure] 87-87:
Error return value ofk.AllocateHoldingsRewardsis not checked (errcheck)x/interchainstaking/types/expected_keepers.go
[failure] 5-5:
redundant-import-alias: Import alias "time" is redundant (revive)x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions.go
[failure] 173-173:
ST1003: method parameter chainId should be chainID (stylecheck)
[failure] 195-195:
commentFormatting: put a space between//and comment text (gocritic)
[failure] 467-467:
ST1003: method parameter chainId should be chainID (stylecheck)
GitHub Check: devskim
x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go
[notice] 1210-1210: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious comment
[notice] 1249-1249: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious comment
Additional comments not posted (188)
x/eventmanager/types/codec.go (1)
15-16: Verify codec registration logic.The
RegisterLegacyAminoCodecfunction is currently empty. Ensure that all necessary types are registered to avoid potential issues with encoding/decoding.func RegisterLegacyAminoCodec(cdc *codec.LegacyAmino) { // Ensure necessary types are registered here }x/eventmanager/keeper/abci.go (1)
11-23: LGTM! But verify event expiry and triggering logic.The
EndBlockerfunction effectively manages event expiration and triggers. Ensure that edge cases, such as simultaneous event expirations and trigger conditions, are handled correctly.Consider adding tests to cover these scenarios if not already present.
proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/query.proto (1)
1-27: Proto file changes approved.The gRPC service definition for querying events is well-structured and includes pagination support, which is beneficial for handling large datasets efficiently.
x/participationrewards/types/keys.go (1)
25-30: Key prefix changes approved. Verify usage in the codebase.The introduction of new key prefixes improves the organization of key management. Ensure that these new prefixes are correctly used throughout the codebase.
Consider checking for any potential impacts on existing functionalities.
x/eventmanager/keeper/grpc_query.go (3)
16-16: Implementtypes.QueryServerinterface.The line correctly implements the
types.QueryServerinterface for theKeeperstruct.
19-22: Validate request inEventsfunction.The request validation correctly checks for a nil request and returns an appropriate gRPC error code.
46-49: Return response inEventsfunction.The response construction for the
Eventsquery is correctly formatted, including pagination.x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper_test.go (6)
15-17: Initialize testing app ininitfunction.The initialization of the testing app with
SetupTestingAppis appropriate for setting up the test environment.
19-21: DefineTestKeeperTestSuitefunction.The
TestKeeperTestSuitefunction correctly uses thesuitepackage to run the test suite.
23-31: DefineKeeperTestSuitestruct.The
KeeperTestSuitestruct is well-defined, including necessary fields for the test setup.
33-40: ImplementGetSimAppmethod.The
GetSimAppmethod correctly retrieves theQuicksilverapp from a test chain, with error handling for type assertion.
42-49: ImplementSetupTestmethod.The
SetupTestmethod initializes the coordinator, chains, and path, setting up the test environment effectively.
51-57: ImplementnewSimAppPathfunction.The
newSimAppPathfunction correctly initializes a new path with channel configurations for testing.x/eventmanager/types/keys.go (4)
3-15: Define module constants.The module constants are well-defined and follow a consistent naming convention.
17-41: Define event status and type constants.The event status and type constants are clearly defined. However, consider relocating some constants to their respective modules as suggested in previous comments.
43-49: Define field constants.The field constants are appropriately defined for use in event management.
51-51: DefineKeyPrefixEvent.The
KeyPrefixEventis correctly defined for key prefixing in the store.x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper.go (6)
15-20: Struct Definition Looks Good.The
Keeperstruct is appropriately defined for managing event callbacks with necessary fields.
22-29: Function Implementation Looks Good.
NewKeepercorrectly initializes the Keeper instance with necessary fields.
31-33: Method Implementation Looks Good.
GetCodeccorrectly returns the codec from the Keeper.
35-42: Method Implementation Looks Good.
SetCallbackHandlercorrectly sets a callback handler and handles errors for duplicate handlers.
44-47: Method Implementation Looks Good.
Loggercorrectly returns a module-specific logger using the context.
49-60: Method Implementation Looks Good.
Callcorrectly executes a callback if it exists, handling errors for missing callbacks.proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/genesis.proto (9)
11-25: Message Definition Looks Good.The
Eventmessage is well-defined with necessary fields for representing an event.
30-37: Enum Definition Looks Good.The
FieldOperatorenum is well-defined with common operators for field comparisons.
39-47: Enum Definition Looks Good.The
Comparatorenum is well-defined with common comparison operators.
49-54: Message Definition Looks Good.The
FieldValuemessage is well-structured for representing a field value condition.
56-59: Message Definition Looks Good.The
ConditionAnymessage is well-structured for representing a condition that requires any field to match.
61-64: Message Definition Looks Good.The
ConditionAllmessage is well-structured for representing a condition that requires all fields to match.
66-71: Message Definition Looks Good.The
ConditionCountmessage is well-structured for representing a condition based on the count of matching fields.
73-76: Message Definition Looks Good.The
ConditionAndmessage is well-structured for representing a logical AND condition between two conditions.
78-81: Message Definition Looks Good.The
ConditionOrmessage is well-structured for representing a logical OR condition between two conditions.x/participationrewards/keeper/events.go (6)
16-20: Struct Definition Looks Good.The
EventCallbacksstruct is well-defined for managing callbacks within the participation rewards module.
24-26: Method Implementation Looks Good.
EventCallbackHandlercorrectly initializes and returns anEventCallbacksinstance with an empty map.
28-34: Method Implementation Looks Good.
Callcorrectly executes a callback if it exists, handling errors for missing callbacks.
36-39: Method Implementation Looks Good.
Hascorrectly checks for the existence of a callback in the map.
46-51: Method Implementation Looks Good.
RegisterCallbackscorrectly registers predefined callbacks using theAddCallbackmethod.
79-84: ## Iteration over mapIteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
Tools
GitHub Check: CodeQL
[warning] 80-82: Iteration over map
Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinismapp/upgrades.go (1)
80-83: Approved: Addition ofemtypes.ModuleNamein upgrade logic.The addition of
emtypes.ModuleNamein thestoreUpgradesfor theV010700UpgradeNameupgrade is a straightforward enhancement to support the new event manager module. This change is well-integrated into the existing upgrade logic.docker-compose.yml (2)
124-139: Confirm the rationale for commenting outrelayerservice.The
relayerservice has been commented out, indicating it is not active. Confirm whether this is a temporary change for testing purposes or if it reflects a shift in architecture.
101-101: Verify compatibility ofhermesversion upgrade.The
hermesservice has been updated to versionv1.8.2. Ensure that this version is compatible with other services and that any new features or bug fixes are accounted for.x/interchainstaking/types/expected_keepers.go (1)
73-77: Ensure correct implementation of EventManagerKeeper methods.The
EventManagerKeeperinterface defines methods for event management. Ensure that the implementations of these methods handle all necessary logic for adding events, setting expiries, and marking events as completed. Verify that these methods are correctly integrated with the rest of the system.x/interchainstaking/keeper/events.go (1)
47-53: Verify callback registration.Ensure that all necessary callbacks are registered and that the identifiers are unique and meaningful.
Verification successful
Callback registration verified.
The callback identifiers in
x/interchainstaking/keeper/events.goare unique within the context of the codebase. No duplicate identifiers were found across other callback registrations.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify callback registration and uniqueness. # Test: Search for callback identifiers. Expect: Unique identifiers for each callback. rg --type go 'AddCallback'Length of output: 4736
x/eventmanager/types/resolver.go (4)
9-21: Ensure correct logic in ResolveAllFieldValues.The function
ResolveAllFieldValueschecks if all field values are resolved. Ensure that the logic correctly handles all edge cases and that the function is used appropriately in the codebase.Verification successful
Logic in ResolveAllFieldValues is correctly implemented and used.
The
ResolveAllFieldValuesfunction is used appropriately in theConditionAll.ResolveandConditionCount.Resolvemethods. The logic correctly handles iterations over events, ensuring that field values are resolved as expected. No issues were found with its implementation or usage.
ConditionAll.Resolve: Setsoutto true if any event resolves successfully.ConditionCount.Resolve: Incrementscountfor each successful resolution.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage and correctness of ResolveAllFieldValues. # Test: Search for usages of ResolveAllFieldValues. Expect: Correct logic and usage. rg --type go 'ResolveAllFieldValues'Length of output: 315
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract context around the usage of ResolveAllFieldValues in conditions.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'ResolveAllFieldValues' x/eventmanager/types/conditions.goLength of output: 679
23-35: Ensure correct logic in ResolveAnyFieldValues.The function
ResolveAnyFieldValueschecks if any field value is resolved. Ensure that the logic correctly handles all edge cases and that the function is used appropriately in the codebase.
37-90: Review resolveFieldValue logic for correctness.The function
resolveFieldValuehandles different field types and operators. Ensure that all cases are correctly implemented and that the logic is robust against invalid inputs.
92-105: Ensure all operators are handled in compare function.The
comparefunction handles different field operators. Ensure that all necessary operators are implemented and that the logic is correct.x/participationrewards/types/participationrewards.go (3)
136-136: Update aligns with new scoring system.The change from
ValidatortoValidatorScorein theValidatorScoresmap is consistent with the new scoring system. Ensure that all related code is updated to handleValidatorScore.
139-145: New structValidatorScoreis well-defined.The
ValidatorScorestruct is appropriately defined with fields forPerformanceScoreandDistributionScore. This aligns with the updated scoring logic.
147-148: MethodTotalScoreis correctly implemented.The
TotalScoremethod accurately sumsPerformanceScoreandDistributionScore, providing a clear and efficient calculation of the total score.x/participationrewards/types/expected_keepers.go (2)
79-82: New methods inInterchainStakingKeeperenhance functionality.The addition of
GetValidatorsAsMapandGetValidatormethods provides more flexible access to validator data, aligning with the interface's purpose.
85-87:EventManagerKeeperinterface aligns with event-driven architecture.The
AddEventandMarkCompletedmethods are well-defined, enhancing the system's modularity and responsiveness by supporting event management.x/interchainstaking/keeper/validators.go (1)
21-29: MethodGetValidatorsAsMapis correctly implemented.The method efficiently retrieves validators and returns them as a map, enhancing lookup capabilities without altering existing functionality.
app/keepers/keys.go (2)
29-29: Import statement foremtypeslooks good.The import of
emtypesfrom theeventmanagerpackage is correctly added, indicating the integration of event management types.
65-65: Addition ofemtypes.StoreKeyis appropriate.The inclusion of
emtypes.StoreKeyin theKVStoreKeysfunction expands the functionality to incorporate event management capabilities, aligning with the PR objectives.x/eventmanager/types/conditions.go (9)
11-14: InterfaceEMKeeperis well-defined.The
EMKeeperinterface provides necessary methods for iteration and codec retrieval, which are essential for event management.
16-19: InterfaceConditionIis well-structured.The
ConditionIinterface extendsproto.Messageand includes aResolvemethod, ensuring that conditions can be serialized and evaluated.
21-32: MethodCanExecuteis correctly implemented.The
CanExecutemethod checks if an event's execution condition is met, using the codec to unpack the condition and resolve it. Error handling is appropriately managed.
66-68: ConstructorNewConditionAllis correctly implemented.The constructor initializes a
ConditionAllinstance with the provided fields and negate flag.
70-91: MethodResolveinConditionAndis correctly implemented.The method resolves two conditions and returns true only if both are true. Error handling is appropriate.
93-103: ConstructorNewConditionAndis correctly implemented.The constructor creates a
ConditionAndinstance with two conditions, ensuring they are packed intoAnytypes.
105-126: MethodResolveinConditionOris correctly implemented.The method resolves two conditions and returns true if either is true. Error handling is appropriate.
128-138: ConstructorNewConditionOris correctly implemented.The constructor creates a
ConditionOrinstance with two conditions, ensuring they are packed intoAnytypes.
140-142: ConstructorNewConditionCountis correctly implemented.The constructor initializes a
ConditionCountinstance with fields, comparator, count, and negate flag.x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosis.go (2)
22-22: Import statement foremtypeslooks good.The import of
emtypesfrom theeventmanagerpackage is correctly added, indicating the integration of event management types.
76-86: Event logging inHooksmethod is well-implemented.The addition of
k.EventManagerKeeper.AddEventenhances the module by logging events related to Osmosis pool updates. This aligns with the PR objectives and improves event tracking.x/participationrewards/keeper/keeper.go (2)
54-54: Add EventManagerKeeper to Keeper Struct.The addition of
EventManagerKeeperto theKeeperstruct enhances its functionality by integrating event management. Ensure that this new field is properly initialized and used throughout the codebase.
165-172: Change Return Type of GetModuleBalance.The
GetModuleBalancemethod now returnssdk.Coininstead ofsdkmath.Int. This change aligns with handling balances more comprehensively. Ensure that all usages of this method are updated to handle thesdk.Cointype.Verification successful
All usages of
GetModuleBalancehandlesdk.Coincorrectly. The method's return type change has been accommodated in the codebase, ensuring compatibility withsdk.Coin. The unrelated usage invalidation.gopertains to a different method.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all usages of `GetModuleBalance` handle the `sdk.Coin` type. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: All occurrences should handle the `sdk.Coin` type. rg --type go -A 3 $'GetModuleBalance'Length of output: 2853
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract more context around each usage of GetModuleBalance to verify handling of sdk.Coin. # Get more lines of context around each usage of GetModuleBalance rg --type go -A 10 -B 3 'GetModuleBalance'Length of output: 7348
x/eventmanager/keeper/events.go (15)
20-30: Review GetEvent Function.The
GetEventfunction retrieves an event from the store. Ensure that the unmarshalling process correctly handles any potential errors and that the function is used safely throughout the codebase.
32-41: Review GetEvents Function.The
GetEventsfunction retrieves multiple events based on a prefix. Ensure that the iteration logic is efficient and that the function is used appropriately in the codebase.
43-49: Review SetEvent Function.The
SetEventfunction marshals and stores an event. Ensure that the marshalling process correctly handles any potential errors.
51-55: Review DeleteEvent Function.The
DeleteEventfunction removes an event from the store. Ensure that this operation is used safely and does not lead to unintended data loss.
57-74: Review IteratePrefixedEvents Function.The
IteratePrefixedEventsfunction iterates over events with a specific prefix. Ensure that the iteration is efficient and that the function is used appropriately in the codebase.
76-78: Review IterateModuleEvents Function.The
IterateModuleEventsfunction iterates over events for a specific module. Confirm that the prefixing logic is consistent with other functions.
80-82: Review IterateModuleChainEvents Function.The
IterateModuleChainEventsfunction iterates over events for a specific module and chain. Ensure consistency with other iteration functions.
84-92: Review AllEvents Function.The
AllEventsfunction retrieves all events in the store. Ensure that this function is used judiciously to avoid performance issues with large datasets.
94-98: Review MarkCompleted Function.The
MarkCompletedfunction marks an event as complete and triggers callbacks. Ensure that the logging and deletion operations are correctly handled.
100-119: Review GetTriggerFn Function.The
GetTriggerFnfunction returns a callback function for event triggering. Ensure that error handling and logging are sufficient for debugging purposes.
121-123: Review Trigger Function.The
Triggerfunction initiates event processing for a specific module and chain. Ensure that it is used correctly in the context of event management.
125-127: Review TriggerAll Function.The
TriggerAllfunction processes all events. Ensure that this function is used judiciously to avoid performance issues with large datasets.
129-145: Review AddEventWithExpiry Function.The
AddEventWithExpiryfunction adds an event with an expiry time. Ensure that the expiry logic is correctly implemented and that events are handled appropriately.
147-175: Review AddEvent Function.The
AddEventfunction adds a new event with a callback and condition. Ensure that the condition is correctly encoded and that the function is used safely.
16-18: Ensure Unique Event Key Generation.The
GenerateEventKeyfunction concatenates strings to create a key. Ensure that the combination ofmodule,chainID, andidis always unique to prevent key collisions.x/eventmanager/module.go (4)
38-41: Review NewAppModuleBasic Function.The
NewAppModuleBasicfunction initializes theAppModuleBasicstruct. Ensure that the codec is correctly assigned and used throughout the module.
96-102: Review NewAppModule Function.The
NewAppModulefunction initializes theAppModulestruct. Ensure that the keeper is correctly assigned and used throughout the module.
122-126: Review RegisterServices Method.The
RegisterServicesmethod registers gRPC services. Ensure that the query server is correctly set up and that all necessary services are registered.
148-150: Review EndBlock Method.The
EndBlockmethod currently returns an empty slice ofValidatorUpdate. Ensure that this behavior is intended and aligns with the module's requirements.x/participationrewards/keeper/hooks.go (12)
31-31: Improve error handling by returning early.The addition of an early return on error improves robustness by preventing further execution when unmarshalling fails.
50-50: Registering new event:get_epoch_height.The addition of this event enhances the event-driven architecture by allowing actions to be taken once the epoch height is retrieved.
80-82: Create condition:conditionGetEpochHeight.The creation of this condition allows for more granular control over event execution, ensuring actions are only taken when specific conditions are met.
85-88: Create condition:conditionValidatorPerformance.This condition ensures that validator performance is evaluated before proceeding with further actions, adding a layer of validation to the event flow.
90-92: Combine conditions:conditionSubmodulePre.Combining conditions into
conditionSubmodulePreallows for complex logic to determine when submodule hooks should be executed.
96-96: Register event:submodules.This event ensures that submodule hooks are called only after certain conditions are met, improving modularity and control.
98-100: Create condition:conditionSubmoduleComplete.This condition checks for the completion of submodule events, ensuring that subsequent actions are only executed when all necessary submodules are ready.
103-105: Combine conditions:conditionCalcTokensPre.This combination ensures that token calculations are only performed when all prerequisite conditions are satisfied, enhancing accuracy and reliability.
108-108: Register event:calc_tokens.This event triggers token calculations once all relevant conditions are met, streamlining the calculation process.
110-113: Create condition:conditionCalcTokensComplete.This condition ensures that rewards distribution only occurs after token calculations are complete, maintaining logical flow.
114-117: Combine conditions:conditionDistributeRewardsPre.Combining these conditions ensures that rewards are distributed only when all necessary preliminary conditions are satisfied.
120-120: Register event:distribute_rewards.This event finalizes the process by distributing rewards once all conditions are met, completing the event-driven flow.
x/interchainstaking/types/zones.go (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Removed withdrawal waitgroup management functions.The removal of
SetWithdrawalWaitgroup,DecrementWithdrawalWaitgroup, andIncrementWithdrawalWaitgroupindicates a shift in managing withdrawal processes, potentially to avoid race conditions or adopt a new approach.Ensure that the removal of these functions does not negatively impact withdrawal processes elsewhere in the codebase.
scripts/simple-test.sh (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Removed transaction execution commands.The removal of transaction-related commands simplifies the script but may affect testing scenarios that require these transactions. Ensure that these changes align with the intended testing strategy.
Consider whether the removed transactions are covered elsewhere or if alternative testing approaches are needed.
x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution.go (1)
Line range hint
179-218: LGTM! Verify allocation logic.The refactoring in
SetZoneAllocationsimproves clarity and modularity. Ensure that the new method calls for allocations (GetHoldingAllocation,GetValidatorAllocation) return the expected values.Verification successful
Verification Successful: Allocation Logic is Correct
The methods
GetHoldingAllocationandGetValidatorAllocationcorrectly implement the logic to retrieve allocation values from the key-value store. They handle missing data by returning default values and ensure data integrity with unmarshaling. The refactoredSetZoneAllocationsmethod should function as intended with these reliable allocation methods.
GetHoldingAllocationandGetValidatorAllocationmethods are correctly implemented inx/participationrewards/keeper/allocations.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the allocation methods return expected values. # Test: Search for the allocation methods and verify their implementations. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (k *Keeper) GetHoldingAllocation($_, $_) $_ { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (k *Keeper) GetValidatorAllocation($_, $_) $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 1859
x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_umee.go (1)
76-86: LGTM! Verify event type and status consistency.The event additions in the
Hooksmethod are consistent and enhance event tracking. Ensure that the event types and statuses (EventTypeICQUmeeReserves,EventStatusActive, etc.) are correctly defined and used throughout the codebase.Also applies to: 110-120, 143-153, 180-190, 214-224
Verification successful
Event Type and Status Consistency Verified
The event types and statuses (
EventTypeICQUmeeReserves,EventStatusActive) are consistently defined and used across the codebase, confirming their correct implementation.
- Defined in
x/eventmanager/types/keys.go- Consistently used in
submodule_umee.goand other relevant filesScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of event types and statuses. # Test: Search for the event types and statuses to ensure they are defined and used correctly. rg --type go 'EventTypeICQUmeeReserves|EventStatusActive'Length of output: 3721
x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection.go (1)
62-62: Update map type ingetZoneScores.The
ValidatorScoresmap now uses*types.ValidatorScoreinstead of*types.Validator. Ensure that this change is propagated throughout the codebase to prevent type mismatches.Verification successful
Map type change to
*types.ValidatorScoreis consistent across the codebase.The
ValidatorScoresmap type change to*types.ValidatorScorehas been correctly propagated throughout the codebase. No type mismatches were found.
x/participationrewards/types/participationrewards.go: DeclaresValidatorScoreswith*ValidatorScore.x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection.go: Uses*types.ValidatorScoreconsistently.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all instances of ValidatorScores use *types.ValidatorScore. # Test: Search for ValidatorScores usage. Expect: All instances should use *types.ValidatorScore. rg --type go 'ValidatorScores\s*map\[string\]\*types.ValidatorScore'Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all instances of ValidatorScores to verify its type usage. # Test: Search for all instances of ValidatorScores. Expect: Identify how it is being used or declared. rg --type go 'ValidatorScores'Length of output: 4086
x/interchainstaking/keeper/hooks.go (1)
148-153: Verify JSON marshaling ofdelegationParams.Ensure that
DelegatorDelegationsParamsis correctly marshaled to JSON and used consistently across the codebase.x/participationrewards/keeper/callbacks.go (7)
100-100: Ensure consistent event marking.The
deferstatement for marking event completion is a good practice. Ensure that similar logging is consistently applied across all callbacks.
144-145: Ensure consistent event marking.The
deferstatement for marking event completion is a good practice. Ensure that similar logging is consistently applied across all callbacks.
216-217: Ensure consistent event marking.The
deferstatement for marking event completion is a good practice. Ensure that similar logging is consistently applied across all callbacks.
248-249: Ensure consistent event marking.The
deferstatement for marking event completion is a good practice. Ensure that similar logging is consistently applied across all callbacks.
280-281: Ensure consistent event marking.The
deferstatement for marking event completion is a good practice. Ensure that similar logging is consistently applied across all callbacks.
312-313: Ensure consistent event marking.The
deferstatement for marking event completion is a good practice. Ensure that similar logging is consistently applied across all callbacks.
344-345: Ensure consistent event marking.The
deferstatement for marking event completion is a good practice. Ensure that similar logging is consistently applied across all callbacks.x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation.go (3)
197-214: LGTM! Verify event logging functionality.The integration of event logging into
PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoinslooks good. Ensure that the events are logged and handled as expected in the broader system.
221-239: LGTM! Verify event logging functionality.The integration of event logging into
PrepareDelegationMessagesForShareslooks good. Ensure that the events are logged and handled as expected in the broader system.
293-303: LGTM! Verify event logging functionality.The integration of event logging into
WithdrawDelegationRewardsForResponselooks good. Ensure that the events are logged and handled as expected in the broader system.app/modules.go (6)
112-112: LGTM! Eventmanager module added to basics.The
eventmanagermodule is correctly added toModuleBasics. This ensures its initialization in the application setup.
175-175: LGTM! Eventmanager module added to app modules.The
eventmanagermodule is correctly added to the list of app modules, ensuring its functionality within the application.
214-214: LGTM! Eventmanager module added to simulation modules.The
eventmanagermodule is correctly added to the list of simulation modules, ensuring its functionality within simulations.
246-246: LGTM! Eventmanager module added to orderBeginBlockers.The
eventmanagermodule is correctly added toorderBeginBlockers, ensuring its begin blocker logic is executed appropriately.
306-306: LGTM! Eventmanager module added to orderEndBlockers.The
eventmanagermodule is correctly added toorderEndBlockers, ensuring its end blocker logic is executed appropriately.
349-349: LGTM! Eventmanager module added to orderInitBlockers.The
eventmanagermodule is correctly added toorderInitBlockers, ensuring its initialization logic is executed appropriately.x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions.go (2)
152-169: LGTM! ScheduleQueuedUnbondings method implemented correctly.The method effectively schedules unbonding events using the event manager. The logic and integration appear sound.
499-502: Placeholder for future implementation.The method
HandleMaturedUnbondingsis defined but not yet implemented. Ensure to complete this method when the related functionality is ready.app/keepers/keepers.go (8)
70-71: Import EventManager packages.The imports for
emkeeperandemtypesare correctly added for the EventManager module.
115-115: Add EventManagerKeeper to AppKeepers struct.The
EventManagerKeeperis correctly added to theAppKeepersstruct, allowing for event management capabilities.
382-382: Initialize EventManagerKeeper in InitKeepers.The
EventManagerKeeperis initialized usingemkeeper.NewKeeperwith the appropriate parameters. Ensure thatemtypes.StoreKeyis correctly defined and used.
396-396: Integrate EventManagerKeeper with InterchainstakingKeeper.The
EventManagerKeeperis integrated into theInterchainstakingKeeperinitialization, indicating its role in managing events related to interchain staking.
415-415: Integrate EventManagerKeeper with ParticipationRewardsKeeper.The
EventManagerKeeperis integrated into theParticipationRewardsKeeperinitialization, indicating its role in managing events related to participation rewards.
425-427: Register EventManagerKeeper CallbackHandler for Interchainstaking.The
EventManagerKeeperis registered with a callback handler for theInterchainstakingmodule. Ensure that theEventCallbackHandleris correctly implemented.
433-435: Register EventManagerKeeper CallbackHandler for ParticipationRewards.The
EventManagerKeeperis registered with a callback handler for theParticipationRewardsmodule. Ensure that theEventCallbackHandleris correctly implemented.
548-548: Add EventManager subspace in initParamsKeeper.The subspace for the
EventManagermodule is correctly added ininitParamsKeeper, allowing for parameter management.x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection_test.go (16)
24-24: Update validatorScores function signature.The
validatorScoresfunction now returnsmap[string]*types.ValidatorScore, reflecting the new data structure for validator scores.
38-38: Return nil for validatorScores in test case.Returning
nilforvalidatorScoresis appropriate for this test case scenario.
62-67: Initialize validatorScores with ValidatorScore structure.The
validatorScoresmap is initialized withValidatorScore, which includesDistributionScoreandPerformanceScore. Ensure that these scores are correctly calculated in the actual implementation.
93-99: Initialize validatorScores with default scores.The
validatorScoresmap is initialized with default scores forDistributionScoreandPerformanceScore. This aligns with the test scenario.
137-143: Initialize validatorScores for different validators.The
validatorScoresmap is initialized for different validators, reflecting the test scenario of different validator addresses.
181-187: Initialize weighted validatorScores.The
validatorScoresmap is initialized with weighted scores, reflecting the test scenario of weighted intents.
248-248: Update validatorScores function signature in TestCalcDistributionScores.The
validatorScoresfunction now returnsmap[string]*types.ValidatorScore, aligning with the updated data structure.
269-269: Return nil for validatorScores in zero validators test case.Returning
nilforvalidatorScoresis appropriate for the zero validators test case scenario.
295-301: Initialize validatorScores with zero voting power.The
validatorScoresmap is initialized with zero voting power, aligning with the test scenario of zero voting power.
330-345: Initialize validatorScores with different voting powers.The
validatorScoresmap is initialized with different voting powers, reflecting the test scenario of varying validator power.
404-404: Update validatorScores function signature in TestCalcOverallScores.The
validatorScoresfunction now returnsmap[string]*types.ValidatorScore, aligning with the updated data structure.
413-413: Return nil for validatorScores in nil delegation rewards test case.Returning
nilforvalidatorScoresis appropriate for the nil delegation rewards test case scenario.
427-427: Return nil for validatorScores in zero total rewards test case.Returning
nilforvalidatorScoresis appropriate for the zero total rewards test case scenario.
450-454: Initialize validatorScores with high performance score.The
validatorScoresmap is initialized with a highPerformanceScore, reflecting the test scenario of a validator removed from the active set.
488-500: Initialize validatorScores for multiple rewarded validators.The
validatorScoresmap is initialized for multiple validators with varying scores, reflecting the test scenario of multiple validators rewarded.
562-562: Call CalcPerformanceScores with updated validatorScores.The call to
CalcPerformanceScoresnow uses the updatedvalidatorScoresmap, aligning with the new data structure.x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go (8)
32-32: Import EventManager types.The import of
emtypesis appropriate for handling event management within the callbacks.
72-72: Register callbacks with EventManager integration.The callbacks are registered with the
EventManagerKeeperintegration, ensuring that events are managed correctly.
126-126: Mark rewards callback as completed.The
RewardsCallbackfunction marks the event as completed usingEventManagerKeeper. Ensure that the event identifier is unique and meaningful.
132-132: Mark delegations epoch callback as completed.The
DelegationsEpochCallbackfunction marks the event as completed usingEventManagerKeeper. Ensure that the event identifier is unique and meaningful.
599-599: Add identifier for DelegationAccountBalanceCallback.An identifier is added for the
DelegationAccountBalanceCallback, ensuring traceability of the event.
613-615: Mark delegation account balance callback as completed.The
DelegationAccountBalanceCallbackfunction marks the event as completed usingEventManagerKeeper. Ensure that the event identifier is unique and meaningful.
675-675: Mark delegation account balances callback as completed.The
DelegationAccountBalancesCallbackfunction marks the event as completed usingEventManagerKeeper. Ensure that the event identifier is unique and meaningful.
699-709: Add event for each delegation account balance query.An event is added for each delegation account balance query using
EventManagerKeeper. Ensure that the event is correctly added and managed.x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper.go (3)
61-61: Addition ofEventManagerKeepertoKeeperstruct looks good.The field
EventManagerKeeperhas been added to theKeeperstruct, enabling event management capabilities. This aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing event tracking.
82-82: Inclusion ofeventManagerKeeperinNewKeeperis appropriate.The
NewKeeperconstructor now accepts aneventManagerKeeperparameter, which is correctly assigned to theEventManagerKeeperfield in theKeeperstruct. This change is consistent with the integration of event management functionality.Also applies to: 112-112
714-714: Integration ofMarkCompletedinUpdateRedemptionRateis correct.The call to
k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedmarks the completion of an event related to redemption rate updates. This aligns with the goal of improving event tracking and management.x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go (13)
33-33: Addition ofemtypesimport is appropriate.The
emtypesimport is necessary for handling event management types, aligning with the integration of event management functionality.
418-418: Simplification ofhandleSendToDelegatereturn type is beneficial.The function now returns only an
error, simplifying the interface and focusing on error propagation. This aligns with the improved error handling strategy.
742-743: Event management integration inHandleUndelegateis well-implemented.The calls to
k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedandk.EventManagerKeeper.AddEventenhance the tracking of undelegation events, aligning with the PR's event management objectives.Also applies to: 790-800
885-886: Integration ofMarkCompletedinHandleFailedUndelegateis appropriate.The call to
k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedmarks the completion of a failed undelegation event, enhancing event tracking.
978-979: Integration ofMarkCompletedinHandleRedeemTokensis correct.The call to
k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedenhances the tracking of token redemption events, aligning with the PR's objectives.
1027-1028: Integration ofMarkCompletedinHandleFailedRedeemTokensis appropriate.The call to
k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedmarks the completion of a failed token redemption event, enhancing event tracking.
1049-1050: Integration ofMarkCompletedinHandleDelegateis correct.The call to
k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedenhances the tracking of delegation events, aligning with the PR's objectives.
1099-1099: Integration ofMarkCompletedinHandleFailedDelegateis appropriate.The call to
k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedmarks the completion of a failed delegation event, enhancing event tracking.
1176-1176: Event management integration inUpdateDelegationRecordsForAddressis well-implemented.The calls to
k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedandk.EventManagerKeeper.AddEventenhance the tracking of delegation records, aligning with the PR's event management objectives.Also applies to: 1202-1212, 1241-1251
1289-1289: Integration ofMarkCompletedinUpdateDelegationRecordForAddressis appropriate.The call to
k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedmarks the completion of a delegation record update, enhancing event tracking.
1314-1314: Integration ofMarkCompletedinHandleWithdrawRewardsis correct.The call to
k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedenhances the tracking of withdrawal reward events, aligning with the PR's objectives.
1340-1350: Integration ofAddEventinTriggerRedemptionRateis appropriate.The call to
k.EventManagerKeeper.AddEventadds an event for querying withdrawal balance, enhancing event tracking.
1356-1356: Integration ofMarkCompletedinDistributeRewardsFromWithdrawAccountis correct.The call to
k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompletedmarks the completion of a reward distribution event, enhancing event tracking.x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go (3)
4830-4832: Verify the correctness of the hash and event handling.Ensure that the hash calculation and event handling logic are correct and consistent with the intended functionality.
Verification successful
The hash and event handling logic are correctly implemented.
The usage of SHA-256 hashing and event handling in the test function is consistent with other parts of the codebase, confirming its correctness.
- The hash calculation using
sha256.Sum256is consistently applied.- The
EventManagerKeeper.AddEventmethod is used appropriately.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of SHA-256 hashing and event handling in the codebase. # Test: Search for SHA-256 hash usage. Expect: Consistent usage with the test function. rg --type go 'sha256.Sum256' # Test: Search for EventManagerKeeper event handling. Expect: Consistent event handling logic. rg --type go 'EventManagerKeeper.AddEvent'Length of output: 7151
4877-4879: Verify the correctness of the hash and event handling for non-batch context.Ensure that the hash calculation and event handling logic for non-batch contexts are correct and consistent with the intended functionality.
Verification successful
SHA-256 Hashing and Event Handling Logic Verified
The usage of SHA-256 hashing and the event handling logic in the non-batch context within the test file is consistent with the rest of the codebase. The implementation correctly follows the pattern of hashing message bytes and adding events with specific identifiers and statuses.
- The hashing of
msg.GetSignBytes()usingsha256.Sum256is consistent across multiple instances.- The event handling logic using
EventManagerKeeper.AddEventfollows the expected pattern for adding events.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of SHA-256 hashing and event handling for non-batch contexts in the codebase. # Test: Search for SHA-256 hash usage without batch context. Expect: Consistent usage with the test function. rg --type go 'sha256.Sum256' # Test: Search for EventManagerKeeper event handling without batch context. Expect: Consistent event handling logic. rg --type go 'EventManagerKeeper.AddEvent'Length of output: 7151
4853-4856: Verify the correctness of the hash and event handling for performance address.Ensure that the hash calculation and event handling logic for performance addresses are correct and consistent with the intended functionality.
Verification successful
Verification successful: SHA-256 hash and event handling logic are consistent.
The usage of SHA-256 hashing and the
EventManagerKeeper.AddEventfunction in theibc_packet_handlers_test.gofile is consistent with other parts of the codebase. The logic for handling events with performance addresses is correctly implemented and aligns with the intended functionality.
- The hash calculation using
sha256.Sum256is consistently applied for event identifiers.- The event handling logic in
EventManagerKeeper.AddEventfollows a similar pattern across different contexts.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of SHA-256 hashing and event handling for performance addresses in the codebase. # Test: Search for SHA-256 hash usage with performance addresses. Expect: Consistent usage with the test function. rg --type go 'sha256.Sum256' # Test: Search for EventManagerKeeper event handling with performance addresses. Expect: Consistent event handling logic. rg --type go 'EventManagerKeeper.AddEvent'Length of output: 7151
x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks_test.go (13)
Line range hint
1-4: LGTM!The context setup for the test case is clear and consistent.
Line range hint
1-5: LGTM!The context setup is consistent and straightforward.
Line range hint
1-5: LGTM!The setup for the delegation total rewards query request is appropriate.
2495-2540: LGTM!The test cases are well-structured, and the consolidation of expected outcomes into
ExpectedCountsimplifies the assertions.
Line range hint
1-5: LGTM!The context setup for setting the zone's delegation address balance is consistent and appropriate.
2571-2573: LGTM!The assertions for checking the expected event count are clear and align with the test case objectives.
Line range hint
1-5: LGTM!The context setup is consistent and appropriate for the test case.
Line range hint
1-5: LGTM!The context setup is straightforward and consistent with other hunks.
2697-2706: LGTM!The assertions for event existence and counts are clear and align with the test case objectives.
Line range hint
1-5: LGTM!The context setup for setting the validator's delegation address balance is consistent and appropriate.
2740-2747: LGTM!The assertions for event existence and counts are clear and align with the test case objectives.
Line range hint
1-5: LGTM!The context setup for setting the validator's delegation address balance is consistent and appropriate.
2785-2792: LGTM!The assertions for event existence, counts, and transaction count are clear and align with the test case objectives.
x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation_test.go (1)
628-628: LGTM! Ensure correct context usage.The addition of the
ctxparameter aligns with the updated function signature. Ensure that the context is correctly utilized in thePrepareDelegationMessagesForCoinsfunction implementation.Verification successful
Context Parameter Usage Verified in
PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoinsThe
ctxparameter is correctly included and utilized in thePrepareDelegationMessagesForCoinsmethod of theKeeperstruct. This aligns with the changes in the test case. No issues found.
- Function located in
x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of the context parameter in the `PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins` function. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Proper handling of the context parameter. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins(ctx context.Context, $_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 110
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the implementation of the `PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins` function by name to verify its parameters and usage. # Test: Search for the function implementation by name. rg 'func PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins' -A 10 --glob '*.go'Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any method or function with the name `PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins`. # Test: Search for the method or function definition by name, including methods on structs or interfaces. rg 'PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins' -A 10 --glob '*.go'Length of output: 3096
| type EventCallbacks interface { | ||
| AddCallback(id string, fn interface{}) EventCallbacks | ||
| RegisterCallbacks() EventCallbacks | ||
| Call(ctx sdk.Context, id string, args []byte) error | ||
| Has(id string) bool | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider defining a specific function type for callbacks.
Using interface{} for the function parameter in AddCallback can lead to runtime errors if the function signature does not match expectations. It would be more robust to define a specific function type that includes the expected signature for callbacks.
type CallbackFunc func(ctx sdk.Context, args []byte) error
type EventCallbacks interface {
AddCallback(id string, fn CallbackFunc) EventCallbacks
// other methods...
}| func (GenesisState) Validate() error { | ||
| return nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement validation logic for GenesisState.
The Validate function currently returns nil, which means no validation is performed. Consider implementing logic to ensure the integrity and correctness of the genesis state.
func (gs GenesisState) Validate() error {
// Implement validation logic here
// Example: Check for nil values, invalid configurations, etc.
return nil
}| // GetHoldingAllocation returns sdk.Coin allocated to the given identifier. | ||
| func (k *Keeper) GetHoldingAllocation(ctx sdk.Context, chainID string) sdk.Coin { | ||
| value := sdk.Coin{} | ||
| store := prefix.NewStore(ctx.KVStore(k.storeKey), types.KeyPrefixHoldingAllocation) | ||
| bz := store.Get([]byte(chainID)) | ||
| if len(bz) == 0 { | ||
| return value | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| k.cdc.MustUnmarshal(bz, &value) | ||
| return value | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding error handling for unmarshalling.
The GetHoldingAllocation function currently assumes that unmarshalling will always succeed. Consider adding error handling to manage potential unmarshalling errors gracefully.
// Example error handling
err := k.cdc.Unmarshal(bz, &value)
if err != nil {
// Handle error, possibly returning a default value or logging
}| // GetValidatorAllocation returns sdk.Coin allocated to the given identifier. | ||
| func (k *Keeper) GetValidatorAllocation(ctx sdk.Context, chainID string) sdk.Coin { | ||
| value := sdk.Coin{} | ||
| store := prefix.NewStore(ctx.KVStore(k.storeKey), types.KeyPrefixValidatorAllocation) | ||
| bz := store.Get([]byte(chainID)) | ||
| if len(bz) == 0 { | ||
| return value | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| k.cdc.MustUnmarshal(bz, &value) | ||
| return value | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding error handling for unmarshalling.
Similar to GetHoldingAllocation, the GetValidatorAllocation function should include error handling for the unmarshalling process.
// Example error handling
err := k.cdc.Unmarshal(bz, &value)
if err != nil {
// Handle error, possibly returning a default value or logging
}| func (k Keeper) DetermineAllocations(ctx sdk.Context, moduleBalance sdk.Coin, proportions types.DistributionProportions) error { | ||
| if moduleBalance.IsNil() || moduleBalance.IsZero() { | ||
| return types.ErrNothingToAllocate | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if sum := proportions.Total(); !sum.Equal(sdk.OneDec()) { | ||
| return fmt.Errorf("%w: got %v", types.ErrInvalidTotalProportions, sum) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // split participation rewards allocations | ||
| validatorAllocation := sdk.NewDecFromInt(moduleBalance.Amount).Mul(proportions.ValidatorSelectionAllocation).TruncateInt() | ||
| holdingAllocation := sdk.NewDecFromInt(moduleBalance.Amount).Mul(proportions.HoldingsAllocation).TruncateInt() | ||
|
|
||
| // use sum to check total distribution to collect and allocate dust | ||
| sum := validatorAllocation.Add(holdingAllocation) | ||
| dust := moduleBalance.Amount.Sub(sum) | ||
|
|
||
| // Add dust to validator choice allocation (favors decentralization) | ||
| validatorAllocation = validatorAllocation.Add(dust) | ||
|
|
||
| k.SetHoldingAllocation(ctx, types.ModuleName, sdk.NewCoin(moduleBalance.Denom, holdingAllocation)) | ||
| k.SetValidatorAllocation(ctx, types.ModuleName, sdk.NewCoin(moduleBalance.Denom, validatorAllocation)) | ||
|
|
||
| return nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify error message for invalid proportions.
The error message in DetermineAllocations could be more descriptive. Consider including additional context about the expected and actual values.
return fmt.Errorf("%w: expected 1.0, got %v", types.ErrInvalidTotalProportions, sum)| // Call calls callback handler. | ||
| func (c EventCallbacks) Call(ctx sdk.Context, id string, args []byte) error { | ||
| if !c.Has(id) { | ||
| return fmt.Errorf("callback %s not found", id) | ||
| } | ||
| return c.callbacks[id](c.k, ctx, args) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential errors in callback execution.
When calling a callback, consider handling potential errors more gracefully, perhaps by logging the error or taking corrective action.
// Call calls callback handler.
func (c EventCallbacks) Call(ctx sdk.Context, id string, args []byte) error {
if !c.Has(id) {
return fmt.Errorf("callback %s not found", id)
}
err := c.callbacks[id](c.k, ctx, args)
if err != nil {
// Log or handle the error as needed
fmt.Printf("Error executing callback %s: %v\n", id, err)
}
return err
}| func EmitDelegatorDelegations(k *Keeper, ctx sdk.Context, args []byte) error { | ||
| var params DelegatorDelegationsParams | ||
| err := json.Unmarshal(args, ¶ms) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| k.ICQKeeper.MakeRequest( | ||
| ctx, | ||
| params.ConnectionID, | ||
| params.ChainID, | ||
| "cosmos.staking.v1beta1.Query/DelegatorDelegations", | ||
| params.Request, | ||
| sdk.NewInt(-1), | ||
| types.ModuleName, | ||
| "delegations_epoch", | ||
| 0, | ||
| ) | ||
| return nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider logging errors in EmitDelegatorDelegations.
When errors occur during JSON unmarshalling or request making, consider logging these errors for better traceability and debugging.
func EmitDelegatorDelegations(k *Keeper, ctx sdk.Context, args []byte) error {
var params DelegatorDelegationsParams
err := json.Unmarshal(args, ¶ms)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("Error unmarshalling args: %v\n", err)
return err
}
err = k.ICQKeeper.MakeRequest(
ctx,
params.ConnectionID,
params.ChainID,
"cosmos.staking.v1beta1.Query/DelegatorDelegations",
params.Request,
sdk.NewInt(-1),
types.ModuleName,
"delegations_epoch",
0,
)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("Error making request: %v\n", err)
}
return err
}| func CalculateRedemptionRate(k *Keeper, ctx sdk.Context, args []byte) error { | ||
| zone, found := k.GetZone(ctx, string(args)) | ||
| if !found { | ||
| return fmt.Errorf("unable to find zone %s", args) | ||
| } | ||
| return k.TriggerRedemptionRate(ctx, &zone) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle missing zone errors more gracefully in CalculateRedemptionRate.
Consider logging the error when a zone is not found to aid in debugging and monitoring.
func CalculateRedemptionRate(k *Keeper, ctx sdk.Context, args []byte) error {
zone, found := k.GetZone(ctx, string(args))
if !found {
err := fmt.Errorf("unable to find zone %s", args)
fmt.Println(err)
return err
}
return k.TriggerRedemptionRate(ctx, &zone)
}| func ExecuteQueuedUnbondings(k *Keeper, ctx sdk.Context, args []byte) error { | ||
| var params UnbondingsParams | ||
| err := json.Unmarshal(args, ¶ms) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return err | ||
| } | ||
| return k.HandleQueuedUnbondings(ctx, params.Zone, int64(params.Epoch), params.Rate) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Log errors in ExecuteQueuedUnbondings.
Consider logging any errors encountered during JSON unmarshalling or handling queued unbondings for better traceability.
func ExecuteQueuedUnbondings(k *Keeper, ctx sdk.Context, args []byte) error {
var params UnbondingsParams
err := json.Unmarshal(args, ¶ms)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("Error unmarshalling args: %v\n", err)
return err
}
err = k.HandleQueuedUnbondings(ctx, params.Zone, int64(params.Epoch), params.Rate)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("Error handling queued unbondings: %v\n", err)
}
return err
}| func DistributeUnbondings(k *Keeper, ctx sdk.Context, args []byte) error { | ||
| var params UnbondingsParams | ||
| err := json.Unmarshal(args, ¶ms) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return err | ||
| } | ||
| return k.PayoutUnbondings(ctx, int64(params.Epoch), params.Zone) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Log errors in DistributeUnbondings.
Consider logging any errors encountered during JSON unmarshalling or payout unbondings for better traceability.
func DistributeUnbondings(k *Keeper, ctx sdk.Context, args []byte) error {
var params UnbondingsParams
err := json.Unmarshal(args, ¶ms)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("Error unmarshalling args: %v\n", err)
return err
}
err = k.PayoutUnbondings(ctx, int64(params.Epoch), params.Zone)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("Error in payout unbondings: %v\n", err)
}
return err
}
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you! |
joe-bowman
force-pushed
the
eventmanager
branch
from
806398f to
62c32ba
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 62
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (95)
x/eventmanager/types/callbacks.go (2)
7-12: Add comprehensive documentation for the interface and its methods.The interface lacks documentation explaining its purpose, method behaviors, and usage patterns. This is particularly important as it's a foundational component used across modules for async task management.
Add documentation like this:
+// EventCallbacks defines the interface for managing callback functions in the event system. +// It provides methods for registering, executing, and checking the existence of callbacks. +// Implementation must be thread-safe when used in concurrent contexts. type EventCallbacks interface { + // AddCallback registers a new callback function with the given ID. + // Returns the EventCallbacks instance for method chaining. + // The callback function should match the expected signature for the specific event type. AddCallback(id string, fn interface{}) EventCallbacks + + // RegisterCallbacks initializes and registers all default callbacks. + // Returns the EventCallbacks instance for method chaining. RegisterCallbacks() EventCallbacks + + // Call executes the callback identified by id with the provided context and arguments. + // Returns an error if the callback execution fails or if the callback doesn't exist. Call(ctx sdk.Context, id string, args []byte) error + + // Has checks if a callback with the given ID exists. Has(id string) bool }
8-8: Consider adding validation for callback registration.The
AddCallbackmethod should validate:
- Non-empty callback ID
- Non-nil callback function
- Prevent duplicate registrations (unless overwriting is intended)
Consider enhancing the interface:
type EventCallbacks interface { // AddCallback registers a callback, returning an error if validation fails AddCallback(id string, fn interface{}) (EventCallbacks, error) // ... other methods }app/upgrades/v1_9.go (2)
1-9: Add version constant declarationConsider adding a version constant to maintain consistency with other upgrade handlers and make the version number reusable.
Add at the top of the file:
package upgrades +const ( + // V010900UpgradeName is the name of the 1.9.0 upgrade + V010900UpgradeName = "v1.9.0" +)
10-18: Document breaking changes and add safety checksThe PR objectives mention potential breaking changes. The upgrade handler should include safety checks and documentation about these changes.
Consider:
- Adding detailed comments about breaking changes
- Implementing safety checks before migration
- Adding rollback procedures if possible
Example structure:
func V010900UpgradeHandler( mm *module.Manager, configurator module.Configurator, appKeepers *keepers.AppKeepers, ) upgradetypes.UpgradeHandler { return func(ctx sdk.Context, _ upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) { + // Safety checks for breaking changes: + // 1. Verify no pending async operations in old format + // 2. Validate state consistency + if err := validatePreUpgradeState(ctx, appKeepers); err != nil { + return nil, err + } + return mm.RunMigrations(ctx, configurator, fromVM) } }x/eventmanager/keeper/abci.go (2)
11-11: Add function documentation.Consider adding a detailed godoc comment explaining the purpose, behavior, and any side effects of this EndBlocker implementation.
+// EndBlocker is called at the end of every block, processes expired events, +// and executes pending triggers. It performs cleanup of expired events and +// ensures all necessary triggers are executed based on the current state. func (k Keeper) EndBlocker(ctx sdk.Context) {
13-13: Consider enhancing telemetry with error tracking.The current telemetry implementation only measures duration. Consider adding error counts and success/failure metrics.
- defer telemetry.ModuleMeasureSince(types.ModuleName, time.Now(), telemetry.MetricKeyEndBlocker) + start := time.Now() + defer func() { + telemetry.ModuleMeasureSince(types.ModuleName, start, telemetry.MetricKeyEndBlocker) + if err := recover(); err != nil { + telemetry.IncrCounter(1, types.ModuleName, "panic") + panic(err) + } + }()proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/query.proto (2)
11-17: Consider adding more specific query methods.While the current implementation is correct, consider enhancing the service with additional query methods for better usability:
- Query events by type
- Query events by status
- Query future events
This would provide more granular control and potentially better performance for specific use cases.
19-27: Consider adding filtering options to the request message.The current implementation is solid, but consider enhancing QueryEventsRequest with additional filtering parameters:
message QueryEventsRequest { cosmos.base.query.v1beta1.PageRequest pagination = 1; string chain_id = 2; + string event_type = 3; + string status = 4; + google.protobuf.Timestamp after = 5; + google.protobuf.Timestamp before = 6; }This would allow clients to perform more targeted queries and reduce unnecessary data transfer.
x/participationrewards/types/keys.go (2)
27-32: Consider documenting the purpose of new key prefixes.The new key prefixes (
KeyPrefixHoldingAllocation,KeyPrefixValidatorAllocation,KeyPrefixValues) suggest significant state management capabilities, but their specific purposes aren't documented.Add comments explaining each prefix's purpose:
var ( KeyPrefixProtocolData = []byte{0x00} + // KeyPrefixHoldingAllocation stores allocation data for holdings KeyPrefixHoldingAllocation = []byte{0x01} + // KeyPrefixValidatorAllocation stores allocation data for validators KeyPrefixValidatorAllocation = []byte{0x02} + // KeyPrefixValues stores generic values for the module KeyPrefixValues = []byte{0x03} )
27-32: Consider architectural implications of new state management.The introduction of new key prefixes for holdings, validator allocations, and values suggests a significant enhancement to state management capabilities. This aligns with the PR's objective of improving async task tracking.
Consider the following architectural recommendations:
- Ensure atomic operations when updating related state (e.g., holdings and validator allocations)
- Consider implementing state migration handlers if existing data needs to be reorganized
- Document the relationship between these new state entries and the event management system
x/eventmanager/keeper/grpc_query.go (3)
26-28: Consider adding memory safeguards.The events slice grows unbounded which could lead to memory issues with large datasets. Consider:
- Adding a maximum limit for the number of events
- Pre-allocating the slice with an estimated capacity
- var events []types.Event + events := make([]types.Event, 0, k.GetDefaultLimit()) // Add GetDefaultLimit() to keeper + if req.Pagination != nil && req.Pagination.Limit > k.GetMaxLimit() { + return nil, status.Error(codes.InvalidArgument, "requested limit exceeds maximum allowed") + }
24-25: Improve context handling.The context is properly unwrapped but consider adding timeout handling for long-running queries:
- Check for context cancellation
- Return appropriate error if context is done
ctx := sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(c) + if ctx.Err() != nil { + return nil, status.Error(codes.Canceled, "request cancelled") + } var events []types.Event store := prefix.NewStore(ctx.KVStore(k.storeKey), types.KeyPrefixEvent) pageRes, err := query.FilteredPaginate(store, req.Pagination, func(_, value []byte, accumulate bool) (bool, error) { + if ctx.Err() != nil { + return false, ctx.Err() + }Also applies to: 29-44
29-41: Consider adding flexible event filtering capabilities.Given that this is part of a larger async task tracking system, consider enhancing the filtering capabilities:
- Add support for filtering by event status
- Allow filtering by event type (ICA transactions, ICQ queries, unbonding)
- Consider adding time-based filters
This would provide more flexibility for monitoring different types of async operations mentioned in the PR objectives.
x/eventmanager/keeper/client/cli/query.go (2)
33-61: Enhance command usability with validation and documentationWhile the implementation is solid, consider these improvements:
- Add chain ID format validation
- Document the response format in the command description
- Include example usage
Here's a suggested improvement:
func GetEventsQueryCmd() *cobra.Command { cmd := &cobra.Command{ Use: "events", - Short: "Query the events for given chain", + Short: "Query the events for given chain", + Long: `Query all events for a specific chain. + +Response includes event details such as type, status, and completion conditions. + +Example: + $ quicksilverd query eventmanager events cosmoshub-4`, Args: cobra.ExactArgs(1), RunE: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) error { + chainID := args[0] + // Basic chain ID format validation + if len(chainID) == 0 { + return fmt.Errorf("chain ID cannot be empty") + } + clientCtx, err := client.GetClientQueryContext(cmd)
1-61: Consider additional query commands for comprehensive event managementGiven that this PR introduces a comprehensive event management system for async tasks, consider adding additional query commands to support:
- Filtering events by type (ICA transactions, ICQ queries, unbonding)
- Querying future events and their conditions
- Viewing event completion history
This would provide better visibility into the event management system described in the PR objectives.
x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
23-31: Consider adding event-specific test fieldsThe test suite structure should include fields specific to event management testing, such as:
- Event registry mock
- Test callbacks
- Event condition trackers
Example addition:
type KeeperTestSuite struct { suite.Suite coordinator *ibctesting.Coordinator chainA *ibctesting.TestChain chainB *ibctesting.TestChain path *ibctesting.Path + + // Event testing fields + testCallbacks map[string]func() + eventRegistry EventRegistry + conditionTracker ConditionTracker }x/eventmanager/types/keys.go (2)
17-21: Consider using iota for event status constantsWhile the current implementation is correct, using
iotawould make the code more maintainable and less prone to errors when adding new status types.const ( - EventStatusUnspecified = int32(0) - EventStatusActive = int32(1) - EventStatusPending = int32(2) + EventStatusUnspecified = int32(iota) + EventStatusActive + EventStatusPending )
51-51: Add documentation for the key prefixThe key prefix lacks documentation explaining its purpose and usage in the store.
+// KeyPrefixEvent defines the prefix for storing events var KeyPrefixEvent = []byte{0x01}x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper.go (1)
1-60: Consider architectural improvements for robust event managementAs this is a core component for managing async tasks and conditional execution, consider these architectural improvements:
- Add metrics for monitoring:
- Callback execution times
- Success/failure rates
- Queue depths
- Consider implementing:
- Circuit breaker pattern for failing callbacks
- Retry mechanisms with backoff
- Dead letter queue for failed callbacks
- Document the contract for EventCallbacks interface
- Add observability through tracing
Would you like help implementing any of these architectural improvements?
proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/genesis.proto (1)
1-81: Consider architectural implications of the event systemThe event system design is solid but consider these architectural aspects:
- Event Persistence: Ensure the system can handle chain upgrades and state migrations
- Performance: The use of Any types and complex conditions might impact performance under load
- Error Handling: Consider adding error details/codes for common failure scenarios
- Monitoring: Add fields to track event processing metrics (e.g., retry count, last attempt)
These considerations will help ensure the system remains maintainable and scalable as the chain grows.
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.45.0)
4-4: import "cosmos_proto/cosmos.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
app/upgrades.go (1)
80-83: Consider upgrade rollback strategySince this upgrade introduces a new module for managing async tasks and callbacks:
- Consider implementing a rollback strategy in case issues are discovered post-upgrade
- Ensure proper testing of all dependent modules that will interact with the event manager
- Plan for backward compatibility with existing async operations during the transition
docker-compose.yml (1)
Line range hint
3-19: Avoid using 'latest' tag for production deploymentsThe
quicksilverandtestzoneservices are using the:latesttag which can lead to unexpected behavior and make deployments non-reproducible.Consider pinning specific versions for these images:
- image: quicksilverzone/quicksilver:latest + image: quicksilverzone/quicksilver:v1.x.x- image: quicksilverzone/testzone:latest + image: quicksilverzone/testzone:v1.x.xAlso applies to: 20-35, 36-51
test/interchaintest/util/sidecars.go (6)
13-14: Add function documentation.Consider adding a documentation comment explaining the purpose of RunICQ, its parameters, and any prerequisites.
+// RunICQ initializes and starts an ICQ (Inter-Chain Queries) sidecar process for testing. +// It configures the process with the provided chains and wallet, sets up necessary configuration +// files, and manages the container lifecycle. func RunICQ(t *testing.T, ctx context.Context, quicksilver, juno *cosmos.CosmosChain, icqUser ibc.Wallet) {
27-44: Consider making configuration values configurable.The configuration contains several hardcoded values that might need to be adjusted for different test scenarios:
- BindPort = 2112
- MaxMsgsPerTx = 50
- GasLimit = 150000000
- GasPrice = "0.003uqck"
Consider making these configurable through function parameters or a configuration struct.
70-73: Fix incorrect error message in panic.The error message refers to a "relayer" but this is an ICQ process.
- panic(fmt.Errorf("an error occurred while stopping the relayer: %s", err)) + panic(fmt.Errorf("an error occurred while stopping the ICQ process: %s", err))
86-87: Add function documentation.Consider adding a documentation comment explaining the purpose of RunXCC and its parameters.
+// RunXCC initializes and starts an XCC (Cross-Chain Communication) sidecar process for testing. +// It configures the process with the provided chains and sets up necessary configuration files. func RunXCC(t *testing.T, ctx context.Context, quicksilver, juno *cosmos.CosmosChain) {
111-112: Remove redundant file read verification.The ReadFile call after WriteFile appears to be unnecessary as WriteFile already returns an error if the operation fails.
err := xcc.WriteFile(ctx, []byte(file), containerCfg) require.NoError(t, err) - _, err = xcc.ReadFile(ctx, containerCfg) - require.NoError(t, err)
117-119: Remove or implement commented code.The commented code checking for container running status should either be implemented or removed.
x/interchainstaking/types/expected_keepers.go (2)
73-77: Add interface and method documentation.The
EventManagerKeeperinterface and its methods should be documented to improve maintainability and usability. Each method's parameters and their purpose should be clearly explained.Add documentation like this:
+// EventManagerKeeper defines the expected event manager functionality. type EventManagerKeeper interface { + // AddEvent registers a new event with the specified parameters. + // module: the module name that owns this event + // chainID: the chain identifier this event belongs to + // identifier: unique identifier for this event + // callback: callback function to execute when conditions are met + // eventType: type of the event (consider using typed constants instead of raw int32) + // status: current status of the event (consider using typed constants instead of raw int32) + // condition: conditions that must be met for the event + // payload: additional data associated with the event AddEvent(ctx sdk.Context, module, chainID, identifier, callback string, eventType, status int32, condition emtypes.ConditionI, payload []byte) + // AddEventWithExpiry registers a new event that expires at a specific time. AddEventWithExpiry(ctx sdk.Context, module, chainID, identifier string, eventType, status int32, expiry time.Time) + // MarkCompleted updates the status of an event to completed. MarkCompleted(ctx sdk.Context, module string, chainID string, identifier string) }
74-74: Use typed constants for eventType and status parameters.The use of raw
int32foreventTypeandstatusparameters could lead to maintainability issues and make the code less type-safe.Consider defining typed constants or enums for these parameters. For example:
// Event types type EventType int32 const ( EventTypeUnknown EventType = iota EventTypeICATransaction EventTypeICQQuery EventTypeUnbonding ) // Event status type EventStatus int32 const ( EventStatusPending EventStatus = iota EventStatusCompleted EventStatusFailed )Then update the method signatures:
-AddEvent(ctx sdk.Context, module, chainID, identifier, callback string, eventType, status int32, condition emtypes.ConditionI, payload []byte) +AddEvent(ctx sdk.Context, module, chainID, identifier, callback string, eventType EventType, status EventStatus, condition emtypes.ConditionI, payload []byte) -AddEventWithExpiry(ctx sdk.Context, module, chainID, identifier string, eventType, status int32, expiry time.Time) +AddEventWithExpiry(ctx sdk.Context, module, chainID, identifier string, eventType EventType, status EventStatus, expiry time.Time)Also applies to: 75-75
test/interchaintest/setup.go (3)
16-20: Document the significance of UID/GID values.The Docker image configurations use specific UID/GID values (1025:1025, 1000:1000) without explanation. Consider adding comments to explain why these specific values are chosen and their significance for security or operational purposes.
Also applies to: 28-32
22-26: Clarify the status of XccLookup integration.The commented-out XccLookup configuration suggests an incomplete or planned feature. Consider either:
- Removing the commented code if it's not needed
- Adding a TODO comment explaining when this will be implemented
- Creating an issue to track this future enhancement
Would you like me to create an issue to track the XccLookup integration?
79-88: Consider environment-specific ICQ configuration.The ICQ sidecar configuration uses fixed ports and paths. Consider:
- Making these values configurable through environment variables
- Adding validation for the home directory path
- Documenting the port usage (2112) and any potential conflicts
x/interchainstaking/keeper/validators.go (2)
21-22: Fix the method comment.The comment appears to be copied from
GetValidators. Update it to accurately describe this method's return type and purpose.-// GetValidators returns validators by chainID. +// GetValidatorsAsMap returns validators by chainID as a map where the key is the validator's operator address.
23-28: Consider pre-allocating the map capacity.The implementation looks good and provides efficient O(1) lookups. Consider pre-allocating the map capacity based on the expected number of validators to reduce memory reallocations.
- validators := map[string]types.Validator{} + // Pre-allocate map with typical capacity for a chain's validator set + validators := make(map[string]types.Validator, 150)x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosis.go (2)
76-86: Consider enhancing event logging robustnessThe event logging implementation could be improved in several ways:
- The empty string parameters ("") should be documented or given meaningful values
- Consider adding error handling for the event addition
- Consider adding event cleanup if the ICQ request fails
k.IcqKeeper.MakeRequest( ctx, connectionData.ConnectionID, connectionData.ChainID, "store/gamm/key", m.GetKeyPrefixPools(pool.PoolID), sdk.NewInt(-1), types.ModuleName, OsmosisPoolUpdateCallbackID, 0, -) // query pool data +) // query pool data +if err != nil { + k.Logger(ctx).Error("failed to make ICQ request", "error", err) + return false +} k.EventManagerKeeper.AddEvent( ctx, types.ModuleName, - "", - fmt.Sprintf("submodule/osmosispool/%d", pool.PoolID), - "", + "osmosis", // source + fmt.Sprintf("submodule/osmosispool/%d", pool.PoolID), // key + "Querying Osmosis pool data", // description emtypes.EventTypeICQOsmosisPool, emtypes.EventStatusActive, nil, nil, )
Line range hint
91-174: Consider refactoring ValidateClaim for better maintainabilityThe method is quite complex with multiple responsibilities and nested error handling. Consider breaking it down into smaller, focused functions:
+func (m *OsmosisModule) validateProofForAddress(ctx sdk.Context, k *Keeper, addr sdk.AccAddress, proof types.Proof, srcZone string) error { + if proof.ProofType == types.ProofTypeBank { + _, err := utils.DenomFromRequestKey(proof.Key, addr) + if err != nil { + // check for mapped address + mappedAddr, found := k.icsKeeper.GetLocalAddressMap(ctx, addr, srcZone) + if !found { + return errors.New("not a valid proof for submitting user") + } + _, err = utils.DenomFromRequestKey(proof.Key, mappedAddr) + if err != nil { + return errors.New("not a valid proof for submitting user or mapped account") + } + } + return nil + } + + // Handle lockup proof validation + var lock osmolockup.PeriodLock + if err := k.cdc.Unmarshal(proof.Data, &lock); err != nil { + return err + } + + _, lockupOwner, err := bech32.DecodeAndConvert(lock.Owner) + if err != nil { + return err + } + + if bytes.Equal(lockupOwner, addr) { + return nil + } + + mappedAddr, found := k.icsKeeper.GetLocalAddressMap(ctx, addr, srcZone) + if !found || !bytes.Equal(lockupOwner, mappedAddr) { + return errors.New("not a valid proof for submitting user or mapped account") + } + + return nil +} func (*OsmosisModule) ValidateClaim(ctx sdk.Context, k *Keeper, msg *types.MsgSubmitClaim) (math.Int, error) { amount := sdk.ZeroInt() - var lock osmolockup.PeriodLock addr, err := addressutils.AccAddressFromBech32(msg.UserAddress, "") if err != nil { return sdk.ZeroInt(), err } keyCache := make(map[string]bool) for _, proof := range msg.Proofs { if _, found := keyCache[string(proof.Key)]; found { continue } keyCache[string(proof.Key)] = true if proof.Data == nil { continue } + if err := m.validateProofForAddress(ctx, k, addr, proof, msg.SrcZone); err != nil { + return sdk.ZeroInt(), err + } + + sdkAmount, err := m.calculateProofAmount(ctx, k, proof, addr, msg.Zone) + if err != nil { + return sdk.ZeroInt(), err + } + + amount = amount.Add(sdkAmount) } return amount, nil }This refactoring:
- Separates proof validation logic into a dedicated method
- Makes the code flow easier to follow
- Reduces nesting levels
- Improves testability
x/participationrewards/keeper/keeper.go (1)
75-75: Add validation for EventManagerKeeper parameterWhile the initialization is correct, consider adding a nil check for the
emkparameter to prevent potential runtime issues.func NewKeeper( // ... other parameters ... emk types.EventManagerKeeper, // ... other parameters ... ) *Keeper { + if emk == nil { + panic("EventManagerKeeper cannot be nil") + } // ... rest of the function ...Also applies to: 100-100
x/eventmanager/keeper/events_test.go (2)
16-22: Add comprehensive documentation for type definitionsThe EventCallback type and EventCallbacks struct would benefit from detailed documentation explaining their purpose and usage patterns.
Add godoc comments:
+// EventCallback defines a function type for event handling that receives a keeper instance, +// context and optional arguments, returning an error if the handling fails type EventCallback func(*keeper.Keeper, sdk.Context, []byte) error +// EventCallbacks implements the types.EventCallbacks interface and manages +// a collection of callback handlers for different event types type EventCallbacks struct { k *keeper.Keeper callbacks map[string]EventCallback }
102-211: Improve test clarity and maintainabilityThe condition-based tests are comprehensive but could benefit from:
- Better documentation of test scenarios
- Separation of condition setup from test logic
- Removal of global state dependency
Consider these improvements:
+// setupTestConditions creates and returns commonly used test conditions +func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) setupTestConditions(ctx sdk.Context) (*types.Condition, *types.Condition, error) { + // Setup basic condition + condition1, err := types.NewConditionAll(ctx, []*types.FieldValue{ + {Field: types.FieldModule, Value: types.ModuleName, Operator: types.FIELD_OPERATOR_EQUAL}, + {Field: types.FieldEventType, Value: fmt.Sprintf("%d", types.EventTypeICAUnbond), Operator: types.FIELD_OPERATOR_EQUAL}, + }, true) + if err != nil { + return nil, nil, err + } + + // Setup complex condition + condition2, err := types.NewConditionAll(ctx, []*types.FieldValue{ + {Field: types.FieldModule, Value: types.ModuleName, Operator: types.FIELD_OPERATOR_EQUAL}, + {Field: types.FieldEventType, Value: fmt.Sprintf("%d", types.EventTypeICADelegate), Operator: types.FIELD_OPERATOR_EQUAL}, + }, true) + if err != nil { + return nil, nil, err + } + + return condition1, condition2, nil +} func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) TestEventLifecycleWithCondition() { + // Test scenario: Verify that events are triggered only when their conditions are met + // 1. Create an active event without conditions + // 2. Create a pending event with conditions depending on the first event + // 3. Verify that completing the first event triggers the second one app := suite.GetSimApp(suite.chainA) ctx := suite.chainA.GetContext() + state := newTestState() // ... rest of the test }x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution.go (1)
225-225: Add logging for skipped zones with nil TVLSilent continuation when encountering nil TVL values could make debugging difficult. Consider adding debug logging or metrics tracking for skipped zones.
- return false + k.Logger(ctx).Debug("skipping zone with nil TVL", + "zone_id", zone.ChainId, + "zone_name", zone.ConnectionId) + return falsex/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_umee.go (2)
76-86: Consider enhancing event metadata and error handling.The event addition looks functionally correct, but could be improved:
- Consider utilizing the empty string parameters (
"") to provide more context.- Consider handling potential errors from
AddEvent.-k.EventManagerKeeper.AddEvent( +if err := k.EventManagerKeeper.AddEvent( ctx, types.ModuleName, - "", + "umee_reserves", // descriptive event source - fmt.Sprintf("submodule/umeereserves/%s", reserves.Denom), + fmt.Sprintf("submodule/umeereserves/%s", reserves.Denom), - "", + fmt.Sprintf("Querying reserves for denom %s", reserves.Denom), // descriptive message emtypes.EventTypeICQUmeeReserves, emtypes.EventStatusActive, nil, nil, -) +); err != nil { + k.Logger(ctx).Error("failed to add umee reserves event", "error", err) +}
Line range hint
75-224: Consider standardizing the event management pattern.The current implementation adds events after ICQ requests across multiple similar code segments. Consider:
- Creating a helper function to standardize event creation with proper error handling and consistent metadata.
- Documenting the relationship between ICQ requests and events in the module's documentation.
- Adding unit tests to verify the event management behavior.
Example helper function:
func (k Keeper) addICQEvent( ctx sdk.Context, eventType string, denom string, description string, ) error { return k.EventManagerKeeper.AddEvent( ctx, types.ModuleName, "icq_request", fmt.Sprintf("submodule/%s/%s", eventType, denom), description, eventType, emtypes.EventStatusActive, nil, nil, ) }Would you like me to help create the unit tests for the event management functionality?
icq-relayer/go.mod (2)
9-10: Review version compatibility between Cosmos SDK and IBC-GoThe module uses Cosmos SDK v0.46.16 with IBC-Go v6.3.1. These versions should be verified for compatibility as mismatched versions could lead to runtime issues.
Consider:
- Documenting the tested version combinations
- Adding version compatibility matrix to README
- Setting up CI checks for version compatibility
Update replace directives to latest compatible versions
Based on the API responses:
- ethermint v0.22.0 (current) is outdated - no newer releases found since April 2023
- cometbft has newer releases (v0.38.15 vs v0.34.33 currently used)
- regen-network/protobuf fork hasn't been updated since January 2021
The replace directives need updates to maintain security and compatibility:
- Replace
github.com/cometbft/cometbft v0.34.33with latest v0.34.x release for compatibility- Review if ethermint v0.22.0 dependency can be upgraded given its age
- Consider alternatives to the unmaintained regen-network/protobuf fork
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
198-202: Verify the necessity of replace directivesThe replace directives are using specific versions. Let's verify if:
- These versions are still maintained and secure
- The replacements are still necessary
- There are newer versions available
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check latest versions and activity of replaced repositories # Check ethermint repository gh api repos/evmos/ethermint/releases/latest # Check cometbft repository gh api repos/cometbft/cometbft/releases/latest # Check if the protobuf replacement is still necessary gh api repos/regen-network/protobuf/commits?per_page=1Length of output: 32949
x/participationrewards/keeper/callbacks.go (4)
144-145: Consider including chain ID for osmosis pool events.The empty string for chainId parameter might limit cross-chain event tracking capabilities.
-defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(ctx, types.ModuleName, "", fmt.Sprintf("submodule/osmosispool/%d", poolID)) +defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(ctx, types.ModuleName, query.ChainId, fmt.Sprintf("submodule/osmosispool/%d", poolID))
372-376: Consider enhancing error handling for protocol data verification.The protocol data verification is a good addition, but consider wrapping multiple error conditions into a more detailed error.
- return fmt.Errorf("unable to find protocol data for connection/%s", query.ChainId) + return fmt.Errorf("protocol data not found for connection/%s: verify connection is properly initialized", query.ChainId)
216-217: Consider refactoring Umee callbacks for better maintainability.The Umee-related callbacks follow a consistent pattern but could benefit from:
- A shared helper function for event completion
- Consistent chain ID handling
- Structured event type constants
Example implementation:
// Add to constants section const ( EventTypeUmeeReserves = "submodule/umeereserves/%s" EventTypeUmeeBorrows = "submodule/umeetotalborrows/%s" // ... other event types ) // Add helper function func (k Keeper) markUmeeEventCompleted(ctx sdk.Context, eventType string, denom string) { k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted( ctx, types.ModuleName, ctx.ChainID(), // or appropriate chain ID fmt.Sprintf(eventType, denom), ) }Then in callbacks:
-defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(ctx, types.ModuleName, "", fmt.Sprintf("submodule/umeereserves/%s", denom)) +defer k.markUmeeEventCompleted(ctx, EventTypeUmeeReserves, denom)Also applies to: 248-249, 280-281, 312-313, 344-345
Based on the analysis of the event completion patterns across the codebase, I can now provide a final response:
Event completion implementation is consistent but could benefit from standardization
The event completion tracking implementation follows a consistent pattern but has some areas for improvement:
- Event types are currently passed as string literals without centralized constants
- Chain ID handling varies between empty strings and actual chain IDs
- No helper functions exist to standardize the event completion calls
- Documentation about event completion patterns is missing
The implementation is functional but these inconsistencies could lead to maintenance challenges. Consider:
- Creating an event type enum/constants in
x/eventmanager/types/keys.go- Standardizing chain ID handling across all callbacks
- Adding helper functions in
x/eventmanager/keeper/events.go- Adding documentation about event completion patterns
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
100-376: Overall implementation feedback.The event completion tracking implementation is solid but could benefit from:
- Standardized event type constants
- Consistent chain ID handling across all callbacks
- Helper functions to reduce code duplication
- Documentation of the event completion patterns
These improvements would enhance maintainability and reduce potential errors in future modifications.
Let's verify the consistency of event handling:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze event completion patterns across the codebase # Check for all event completion calls ast-grep --pattern '$_.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted($_, $_, $_, $_)' # Look for any TODO comments related to event management rg -i "todo.*event" # Check for documentation about event handling fd -e md | xargs rg -i "event.*manager|async.*task"Length of output: 5083
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's analyze the event completion patterns more thoroughly # Check for event type constants and string literals rg -A 1 'MarkCompleted.*"[^"]+"' # Check for any helper functions related to event completion ast-grep --pattern 'func $name($_) { $$$ $_.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted($$$) $$$ }' # Look for event manager interfaces and types ast-grep --pattern 'type EventManager$_ interface { $$$ }' # Check for any documentation in the event manager module fd -g "*.go" -p "x/eventmanager" | xargs rg -i "// "Length of output: 100340
go.mod (1)
Remove unnecessary gin-gonic/gin replace directive
The replace directive for gin-gonic/gin can be safely removed as:
- No direct imports of gin-gonic/gin were found in the codebase
- The ripgrep search shows no usage of the gin package
- The TODO comment (Remove go.mod
replaceline for gin-gonic/gin cosmos/cosmos-sdk#10409) suggests this was a temporary fixThe vulnerability fix replace directive is no longer needed since the package is not used in the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
347-360: Review replace directives for currency and necessity.The replace directives address known issues:
- Cosmos fork of keyring for compatibility
- Fix for GHSA-h395-qcrw-5vmq vulnerability in gin-gonic
- Cosmos flavored protobufs
- Fix for broken goleveldb
- Use of cometbft instead of tendermint
Consider:
- Tracking the TODO for removing gin-gonic fix once upstream is patched
- Evaluating if newer versions of these dependencies have resolved the original issues
Update gin-gonic/gin dependency to address multiple security vulnerabilities
The current replace directive pins gin-gonic/gin to v1.8.1, but newer versions have patched several critical and high severity vulnerabilities:
- Critical: Wildcard mishandling in origin strings (patched in 1.6.0)
- High: HTTP request interpretation vulnerability (patched in 1.7.7)
- High: Logger input sanitization vulnerability (patched in 1.6.0)
- Moderate: Filename sanitization in FileAttachment (patched in 1.9.1)
- Moderate: Input validation issues (patched in 1.9.0)
Let's verify if there are any breaking changes preventing the upgrade:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the vulnerabilities are still present in newer versions gh api graphql -f query=' { securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "github.com/gin-gonic/gin") { nodes { advisory { summary severity publishedAt } vulnerableVersionRange firstPatchedVersion { identifier } } } }'Length of output: 1608
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for gin-gonic/gin usage patterns rg --type go "gin\." -A 2 -B 2 # Check go.mod for the main module version head -n 5 go.modLength of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for gin imports and direct usage rg --type go -l "github.com/gin-gonic/gin" # Check if there are any indirect dependencies requiring gin go mod graph | grep gin-gonic/gin || echo "No gin dependencies found in module graph"Length of output: 264
app/keepers/keepers.go (2)
382-382: Consider adding configuration parameters to EventManagerKeeper initialization.The EventManagerKeeper is initialized with minimal parameters (codec and store key). Consider whether additional dependencies or configuration options might be needed for future extensibility.
425-435: Verify error handling in callback registration.While the error handling follows the pattern used elsewhere in the codebase, consider logging the error details before panicking to aid in debugging.
if err := appKeepers.EventManagerKeeper.SetCallbackHandler(interchainstakingtypes.ModuleName, appKeepers.InterchainstakingKeeper.EventCallbackHandler()); err != nil { + logger.Error("failed to set event callback handler for interchainstaking", "error", err) panic(err) }x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection_test.go (1)
328-346: Consider refactoring duplicated validator score initializationThe validator score initialization code is repeated three times with identical structure. Consider extracting this into a helper function to improve maintainability.
+func initValidatorScore(valAddr string) *types.ValidatorScore { + return &types.ValidatorScore{ + DistributionScore: sdk.NewDec(1), + PerformanceScore: sdk.NewDec(1), + } +} validatorScores := make(map[string]*types.ValidatorScore) vals := appA.InterchainstakingKeeper.GetValidators(ctx, chainId) (&vals[0]).VotingPower = sdk.NewInt(10) -validatorScores[vals[0].ValoperAddress] = &types.ValidatorScore{ - DistributionScore: sdk.NewDec(1), - PerformanceScore: sdk.NewDec(1), -} +validatorScores[vals[0].ValoperAddress] = initValidatorScore(vals[0].ValoperAddress)x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions_test.go (1)
316-316: Consider improving test readability and coverageThe test case could benefit from the following improvements:
- Replace the magic number
129with a named constant or variable that explains its significance- Add test cases for error scenarios
- Verify the content of the generated transaction, not just the count
Consider applying this refactor:
+ const testBlockHeight = 129 // Add comment explaining significance of this height - err = quicksilver.InterchainstakingKeeper.HandleQueuedUnbondings(ctx, zone.ChainId, 129, zone.LastRedemptionRate) + err = quicksilver.InterchainstakingKeeper.HandleQueuedUnbondings(ctx, zone.ChainId, testBlockHeight, zone.LastRedemptionRate) suite.NoError(err) suite.Equal(len(txk.Txs), 1) + // Verify transaction content + tx := txk.Txs[0] + suite.Assert().Contains(tx.String(), "MsgUndelegate") // Adjust expected contentx/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks_test.go (4)
2507-2552: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for LSM shares.The test cases are well-structured and cover comprehensive scenarios including nil balances, regular coins, and LSM shares. The expected counts are properly justified for each case.
Consider adding a comment explaining the LSM share denomination format (
cosmosvaloper.../1) for better maintainability.
2583-2585: Consider revising the event key format.The event key
query_delegationaccountbalance_epoch/has a trailing slash but no subsequent path component. This might be unintentional and could cause confusion.Consider either removing the trailing slash or documenting why it's needed:
-"query_delegationaccountbalance_epoch/" +"query_delegationaccountbalance_epoch"
2709-2718: Document the expected event count.While the code correctly verifies events for each validator, the expected count of 1 is hardcoded without explanation of what this represents.
Consider adding a comment explaining why exactly one event is expected per validator:
+// Expect one delegation event per validator after the operation _, count := app.EventManagerKeeper.GetEvents(ctx, icstypes.ModuleName, zone.ChainId, fmt.Sprintf("delegation/%s", valoperAddress)) suite.Equal(1, count)
2752-2759: Consider extracting a helper function for event verification.The event verification pattern is repeated across multiple test cases with similar structure but different expected counts. This could be simplified using a helper function.
Consider creating a helper function:
func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) verifyDelegationEvents(ctx sdk.Context, zone types.Zone, valOper string, expectedCount int) { // Verify balance query event doesn't exist _, found := app.EventManagerKeeper.GetEvent(ctx, icstypes.ModuleName, zone.ChainId, "query_delegationaccountbalance_epoch/uatom") suite.False(found) // Verify delegation events _, count := app.EventManagerKeeper.GetEvents(ctx, icstypes.ModuleName, zone.ChainId, fmt.Sprintf("delegation/%s", valOper)) suite.Equal(expectedCount, count) }Also applies to: 2797-2804
x/participationrewards/keeper/events.go (1)
66-74: Simplify error handlingThe error handling in this function can be simplified by returning early when errors occur, improving readability.
Refactor the code as follows:
func CalculateTokenValues(k *Keeper, ctx sdk.Context, args []byte) error { defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(ctx, types.ModuleName, "", "calc_tokens") - tvs, err := k.CalcTokenValues(ctx) - if err != nil { + if tvs, err := k.CalcTokenValues(ctx); err != nil { return err } - err = k.SetZoneAllocations(ctx, tvs) - if err != nil { + if err := k.SetZoneAllocations(ctx, tvs); err != nil { return err } return nil }x/interchainstaking/keeper/events.go (7)
49-52: Simplify callback registrations by removing redundant type conversionsAfter updating
AddCallbackto acceptEventCallbackdirectly, the explicit type conversions in theRegisterCallbacksmethod are no longer necessary. Removing them simplifies the code and improves readability.Apply this diff to clean up the callback registrations:
func (c EventCallbacks) RegisterCallbacks() emtypes.EventCallbacks { return c. - AddCallback(ICQEmitDelegatorDelegations, EventCallback(EmitDelegatorDelegations)). - AddCallback(TriggerCalculateRedemptionRate, EventCallback(CalculateRedemptionRate)). - AddCallback(ExecuteQueuedUnbondingsCb, EventCallback(ExecuteQueuedUnbondings)). - AddCallback(DistributeUnbondingsCb, EventCallback(DistributeUnbondings)) + AddCallback(ICQEmitDelegatorDelegations, EmitDelegatorDelegations). + AddCallback(TriggerCalculateRedemptionRate, CalculateRedemptionRate). + AddCallback(ExecuteQueuedUnbondingsCb, ExecuteQueuedUnbondings). + AddCallback(DistributeUnbondingsCb, DistributeUnbondings) }
98-99: Handle errors fromTriggerRedemptionRateThe
CalculateRedemptionRatefunction invokesk.TriggerRedemptionRateand returns its error directly. Consider wrapping the error with additional context to improve traceability.Apply this diff to wrap the error:
func CalculateRedemptionRate(k *Keeper, ctx sdk.Context, args []byte) error { zone, found := k.GetZone(ctx, string(args)) if !found { return fmt.Errorf("unable to find zone %s", args) } - return k.TriggerRedemptionRate(ctx, &zone) + if err := k.TriggerRedemptionRate(ctx, &zone); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to trigger redemption rate for zone %s: %w", zone.ChainId, err) + } + return nil }
113-114: Handle errors fromHandleQueuedUnbondingsIn the
ExecuteQueuedUnbondingsfunction, the error returned byk.HandleQueuedUnbondingsis returned directly. For better error context, wrap the error with additional information.Apply this diff to enhance error handling:
return k.HandleQueuedUnbondings(ctx, params.Zone, int64(params.Epoch), params.Rate) + if err := k.HandleQueuedUnbondings(ctx, params.Zone, int64(params.Epoch), params.Rate); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to handle queued unbondings for zone %s at epoch %d: %w", params.Zone, params.Epoch, err) + } + return nil
122-123: Handle errors fromPayoutUnbondingsSimilarly, in the
DistributeUnbondingsfunction, consider wrapping the error returned byk.PayoutUnbondingswith additional context.Apply this diff to improve error traceability:
return k.PayoutUnbondings(ctx, int64(params.Epoch), params.Zone) + if err := k.PayoutUnbondings(ctx, int64(params.Epoch), params.Zone); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to payout unbondings for zone %s at epoch %d: %w", params.Zone, params.Epoch, err) + } + return nil
15-21: Add documentation comments for exported typesThe exported types
EventCallbackandEventCallbackslack GoDoc comments. Adding documentation helps improve code readability and maintainability.Apply this diff to add comments:
+// EventCallback defines the signature for event callback functions. type EventCallback func(*Keeper, sdk.Context, []byte) error -// Callbacks wrapper struct for interchainstaking keeper. +// EventCallbacks is a wrapper struct for the interchainstaking keeper's callbacks. type EventCallbacks struct { k *Keeper callbacks map[string]EventCallback }
66-71: ValidateDelegatorDelegationsParamsbefore useConsider adding validation to ensure that all required fields in
DelegatorDelegationsParamsare properly set before proceeding. This helps prevent errors due to missing or invalid data.Example of adding validation:
func (p *DelegatorDelegationsParams) Validate() error { if p.ChainID == "" { return fmt.Errorf("chain ID is required") } if p.ConnectionID == "" { return fmt.Errorf("connection ID is required") } if len(p.Request) == 0 { return fmt.Errorf("request data is required") } return nil }And call the validation in
EmitDelegatorDelegations:func EmitDelegatorDelegations(k *Keeper, ctx sdk.Context, args []byte) error { var params DelegatorDelegationsParams err := json.Unmarshal(args, ¶ms) if err != nil { return err } + if err := params.Validate(); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("invalid parameters: %w", err) + } err = k.ICQKeeper.MakeRequest( ctx,
1-123: Consider adding unit tests for new event callbacksThe new event callbacks are central to the functionality of the event manager. Adding unit tests for these callbacks ensures they function as expected and aids in preventing regressions.
Would you like assistance in setting up unit tests for these callbacks?
x/eventmanager/types/resolver.go (3)
89-90: Return an error for unrecognized fieldsWhen none of the
casestatements match in theresolveFieldValuefunction, the code currently returnsfv.Negate, nil. It might be more appropriate to return an error indicating that the field is unrecognized.Consider modifying as follows:
return fv.Negate, nil +// Alternatively, return an error for unrecognized fields +return false, fmt.Errorf("unrecognized field %s", fv.Field)
33-33: Fix typo in commentThere is a typo in the comment at line 33: "conditons" should be "conditions".
Apply this change:
- // return false if none of the conditons passed. + // return false if none of the conditions passed.
103-103: Standardize spelling in error messagesIn the
comparefunction, the error message uses "unrecognised" instead of "unrecognized". For consistency and clarity, consider standardizing the spelling based on your project's language conventions.Update the error message:
- return false, fmt.Errorf("unrecognised operator %d", operator) + return false, fmt.Errorf("unrecognized operator %d", operator)x/eventmanager/types/conditions.go (2)
34-48: Remove commented-out code to improve code clarityThe code between lines 34-48 is commented out. Leaving large blocks of commented code can clutter the codebase and reduce readability. If this code is no longer needed, consider removing it. If it's needed for future reference, using version control history or documentation is preferable.
66-68: Remove unused parameterctx sdk.Contextfrom constructor functionsThe parameter
ctx sdk.Contextin the constructor functionsNewConditionAll,NewConditionAnd,NewConditionOr, andNewConditionCountis not used within these functions. Consider removing it to improve code clarity.Also applies to: 93-104, 128-138, 140-142
x/eventmanager/keeper/events.go (3)
43-43: Improve function comment for clarityThe comment "SetEvent set event." has a grammatical error. Consider rephrasing it for better clarity.
Apply this diff:
-// SetEvent set event. +// SetEvent stores an event in the KVStore.
51-51: Improve function comment for clarityThe comment "DeleteEvent delete event." is grammatically incorrect. Please revise it for clarity.
Apply this diff:
-// DeleteEvent delete event. +// DeleteEvent removes an event from the KVStore.
58-58: Update function comment to match function nameThe comment "IterateEvents iterate through queries." does not accurately describe the function
IteratePrefixedEvents. Please update it for clarity.Apply this diff:
-// IterateEvents iterate through queries. +// IteratePrefixedEvents iterates through events with a given prefix.x/eventmanager/module.go (4)
34-34: Update module name in comments to 'eventmanager module'The comments currently refer to the module as "the capability module," which appears to be a residual from copied code. For clarity and maintainability, please update these comments to correctly refer to "the eventmanager module."
Apply this diff to correct the module name in comments:
-// AppModuleBasic implements the AppModuleBasic interface for the capability module. +// AppModuleBasic implements the AppModuleBasic interface for the eventmanager module. ... -// Name returns the capability module's name. +// Name returns the eventmanager module's name. ... -// DefaultGenesis returns the capability module's default genesis state. +// DefaultGenesis returns the eventmanager module's default genesis state. ... -// ValidateGenesis performs genesis state validation for the capability module. +// ValidateGenesis performs genesis state validation for the eventmanager module. ... -// GetTxCmd returns the capability module's root tx command. +// GetTxCmd returns the eventmanager module's root tx command. ... -// GetQueryCmd returns the capability module's root query command. +// GetQueryCmd returns the eventmanager module's root query command. ... -// AppModule implements the AppModule interface for the capability module. +// AppModule implements the AppModule interface for the eventmanager module. ... -// Name returns the capability module's name. +// Name returns the eventmanager module's name. ... -// Route returns the capability module's message routing key. +// Route returns the eventmanager module's message routing key. ... -// QuerierRoute returns the capability module's query routing key. +// QuerierRoute returns the eventmanager module's query routing key. ... -// LegacyQuerierHandler returns the capability module's Querier. +// LegacyQuerierHandler returns the eventmanager module's Querier. ... -// RegisterInvariants registers the capability module's invariants. +// RegisterInvariants registers the eventmanager module's invariants. ... -// InitGenesis performs the capability module's genesis initialization It returns +// InitGenesis performs the eventmanager module's genesis initialization. It returns ... -// ExportGenesis returns the capability module's exported genesis state as raw JSON bytes. +// ExportGenesis returns the eventmanager module's exported genesis state as raw JSON bytes. ... -// BeginBlock executes all ABCI BeginBlock logic respective to the capability module. +// BeginBlock executes all ABCI BeginBlock logic specific to the eventmanager module. ... -// EndBlock executes all ABCI EndBlock logic respective to the capability module. It +// EndBlock executes all ABCI EndBlock logic specific to the eventmanager module. ItAlso applies to: 44-44, 59-59, 64-64, 77-77, 82-82, 91-91, 105-105, 110-110, 115-115, 118-118, 129-129, 132-132, 138-138, 143-143, 147-147
39-39: Correct grammatical errors in function commentsThe comments for
NewAppModuleBasicandNewAppModuleshould use "returns" instead of "return" to match Go documentation standards.Apply this diff to fix the grammatical errors:
-// NewAppModuleBasic return a new AppModuleBasic. +// NewAppModuleBasic returns a new AppModuleBasic. ... -// NewAppModule return a new AppModule. +// NewAppModule returns a new AppModule.Also applies to: 97-97
70-75: Handle errors without panicking inRegisterGRPCGatewayRoutesUsing
panicfor error handling can cause the entire application to crash unexpectedly. It's better to handle the error gracefully or return it up the call stack.Modify the function to handle the error appropriately:
func (AppModuleBasic) RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutes(clientCtx client.Context, mux *runtime.ServeMux) { - err := types.RegisterQueryHandlerClient(context.Background(), mux, types.NewQueryClient(clientCtx)) - if err != nil { - panic(err) - } + if err := types.RegisterQueryHandlerClient(context.Background(), mux, types.NewQueryClient(clientCtx)); err != nil { + // Log the error or handle it appropriately + fmt.Printf("Error registering gRPC Gateway routes: %v\n", err) + } }Ensure you import the necessary package for logging or error handling, such as:
import ( "fmt" )Alternatively, you might choose to return the error if the function signature allows it.
132-134: Add period to complete the sentence in commentThe comment for
InitGenesisis missing a period, which affects readability.Apply this diff to correct the comment:
-// InitGenesis performs the eventmanager module's genesis initialization It returns +// InitGenesis performs the eventmanager module's genesis initialization. It returnsx/participationrewards/keeper/hooks.go (5)
50-50: Consider using constants for event identifiersTo improve maintainability and reduce the risk of typos, define constants for event identifiers like
"get_epoch_height".
68-68: Clarify log message for allocation processUpdating the log message to "allocate participation rewards..." improves clarity by accurately reflecting the allocation process.
95-97: Use constants for event identifiers and typesFor consistency and maintainability, define constants for event identifiers like
"submodules"and event types likeemtypes.EventTypeSubmodules.
107-109: Use constants for event identifiers and typesConsider defining constants for
"calc_tokens"andemtypes.EventTypeCalculateTvlsto improve code readability and reduce errors.
119-120: Use constants for event identifiers and typesDefining constants for
"distribute_rewards"andemtypes.EventTypeDistributeRewardsenhances readability and maintainability.x/interchainstaking/keeper/hooks.go (1)
248-258: Consider the status of events when adding new eventsWhen adding events with
EventStatusActive, ensure that the event's lifecycle and transitions are correctly managed. If the event should start in a pending state until certain conditions are met, consider usingEventStatusPendinginstead.test/interchaintest/interchainstaking_test.go (8)
45-54: Remove commented-out codeThe block of code from lines 45 to 54 is commented out. If it's no longer needed, consider removing it to keep the codebase clean and improve readability.
92-92: Clean up inline commented codeIn line 92, there's an inline commented function call within the code. To maintain code clarity, consider removing the commented code or uncommenting it if it's required.
117-118: Eliminate unnecessary commented codeThe commented code in lines 117-118 appears to be unused. Removing it can help keep the codebase tidy and focused.
130-133: Userequire.NoErrorinstead ofpanicfor error handlingUsing
panicin tests is discouraged as it abruptly stops the test execution without providing detailed information. Replace thepanicwithrequire.NoErrorto assert the error and get meaningful feedback.Apply this diff to improve error handling:
err := r.StopRelayer(ctx, eRep) -if err != nil { - panic(fmt.Errorf("an error occurred while stopping the relayer: %s", err)) -} +require.NoError(t, err, "an error occurred while stopping the relayer")
275-299: Define constants for repeated literal valuesThe value
5000000is used multiple times in this section. Defining it as a constant (e.g.,depositAmount) will enhance readability and make future adjustments easier.
31-352: RefactorTestInterchainStakinginto smaller functionsThe
TestInterchainStakingfunction is quite lengthy, spanning over 300 lines. Breaking it down into smaller, modular functions will improve readability, maintainability, and make it easier to pinpoint issues.
189-192: Avoid hardcoding the authority addressHardcoding the authority address
"quick10d07y265gmmuvt4z0w9aw880jnsr700j3xrh0p"reduces flexibility and may cause issues if the address changes. Consider retrieving the authority address dynamically or defining it as a constant.
200-200: Remove redundant error checkAt line 200,
require.NoError(t, err)is called without a preceding function that could have updatederr. This check is redundant and can be removed to clean up the code.x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions.go (2)
4-5: Remove unused imports if not necessaryThe newly added imports
"crypto/sha256"and"encoding/binary"should be removed if they are not used in the code to keep the imports clean.
499-502: Implement theHandleMaturedUnbondingsfunction or add a TODOThe
HandleMaturedUnbondingsfunction currently has no implementation. Consider adding the necessary logic or placing aTODOcomment to indicate future work.Would you like assistance in implementing this function or creating a GitHub issue to track this task?
x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go (1)
4829-4837: Refactor repetitive code into a helper function to eliminate duplicationThe code that computes the hash of the message and adds or retrieves events from the
EventManagerKeeperis repeated across multiple test functions (TestHandleFailedDelegate_Batch_OK,TestHandleFailedDelegate_PerfAddress_OK, andTestHandleFailedDelegate_NotBatch_OK). Refactoring this code into a helper function will improve maintainability and reduce code duplication.For example, you can create helper functions like:
func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) addDelegationEvent(ctx sdk.Context, app *app.Quicksilver, msg sdk.Msg, validatorAddress string) [32]byte { hash := sha256.Sum256(msg.GetSignBytes()) app.EventManagerKeeper.AddEvent(ctx, types.ModuleName, suite.chainB.ChainID, fmt.Sprintf("delegation/%s/%x", validatorAddress, hash), "", emtypes.EventTypeICADelegate, emtypes.EventStatusActive, nil, nil) return hash } func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) getDelegationEventCount(ctx sdk.Context, app *app.Quicksilver, validatorAddress string, hash [32]byte) int { _, count := app.EventManagerKeeper.GetEvents(ctx, types.ModuleName, suite.chainB.ChainID, fmt.Sprintf("delegation/%s/%x", validatorAddress, hash)) return count }Then, in your test functions, you can replace the repeated code with calls to these helper methods:
hash := suite.addDelegationEvent(ctx, app, msgMsg, msg.ValidatorAddress) // ... count := suite.getDelegationEventCount(ctx, app, msg.ValidatorAddress, hash)Also applies to: 4853-4861, 4876-4884
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (6)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumgo.work.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumicq-relayer/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumx/eventmanager/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/eventmanager/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/eventmanager/types/query.pb.gw.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.go
📒 Files selected for processing (60)
app/keepers/keepers.go(7 hunks)app/keepers/keys.go(2 hunks)app/modules.go(7 hunks)app/upgrades.go(2 hunks)app/upgrades/types.go(1 hunks)app/upgrades/v1_9.go(1 hunks)docker-compose.yml(2 hunks)go.mod(6 hunks)icq-relayer/go.mod(6 hunks)proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/genesis.proto(1 hunks)proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/query.proto(1 hunks)scripts/simple-test.sh(0 hunks)test/interchaintest/interchainstaking_test.go(1 hunks)test/interchaintest/setup.go(1 hunks)test/interchaintest/util/sidecars.go(1 hunks)x/eventmanager/keeper/abci.go(1 hunks)x/eventmanager/keeper/client/cli/query.go(1 hunks)x/eventmanager/keeper/events.go(1 hunks)x/eventmanager/keeper/events_test.go(1 hunks)x/eventmanager/keeper/grpc_query.go(1 hunks)x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper.go(1 hunks)x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper_test.go(1 hunks)x/eventmanager/module.go(1 hunks)x/eventmanager/types/callbacks.go(1 hunks)x/eventmanager/types/codec.go(1 hunks)x/eventmanager/types/conditions.go(1 hunks)x/eventmanager/types/genesis.go(1 hunks)x/eventmanager/types/keys.go(1 hunks)x/eventmanager/types/resolver.go(1 hunks)x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go(7 hunks)x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks_test.go(5 hunks)x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation.go(5 hunks)x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation_test.go(1 hunks)x/interchainstaking/keeper/events.go(1 hunks)x/interchainstaking/keeper/hooks.go(6 hunks)x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go(17 hunks)x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers_test.go(6 hunks)x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper.go(4 hunks)x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions.go(7 hunks)x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions_test.go(1 hunks)x/interchainstaking/keeper/validators.go(1 hunks)x/interchainstaking/types/expected_keepers.go(3 hunks)x/interchainstaking/types/zones.go(0 hunks)x/interchainstaking/types/zones_test.go(0 hunks)x/participationrewards/keeper/allocations.go(1 hunks)x/participationrewards/keeper/callbacks.go(8 hunks)x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution.go(2 hunks)x/participationrewards/keeper/events.go(1 hunks)x/participationrewards/keeper/hooks.go(4 hunks)x/participationrewards/keeper/keeper.go(4 hunks)x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection.go(7 hunks)x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection_test.go(18 hunks)x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_liquid.go(1 hunks)x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosis.go(2 hunks)x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_umee.go(6 hunks)x/participationrewards/types/allocations.go(0 hunks)x/participationrewards/types/allocations_test.go(0 hunks)x/participationrewards/types/expected_keepers.go(2 hunks)x/participationrewards/types/keys.go(1 hunks)x/participationrewards/types/participationrewards.go(1 hunks)
🔥 Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation_test.go: Error: Server error: no LLM provider could handle the message
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (5)
- scripts/simple-test.sh
- x/interchainstaking/types/zones.go
- x/interchainstaking/types/zones_test.go
- x/participationrewards/types/allocations.go
- x/participationrewards/types/allocations_test.go
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- x/eventmanager/types/genesis.go
- x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_liquid.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 buf (1.45.0)
proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/genesis.proto
4-4: import "cosmos_proto/cosmos.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/query.proto
4-4: import "cosmos/base/query/v1beta1/pagination.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
🔇 Additional comments (109)
x/eventmanager/types/callbacks.go (1)
10-10: Clarify the purpose and necessity of RegisterCallbacks.
The RegisterCallbacks method's purpose is unclear. If it's meant for registering default callbacks, consider:
- Renaming it to
RegisterDefaultCallbacksfor clarity - Moving default callback registration to the constructor
- Making it private if it's only needed during initialization
Let's check its usage pattern:
x/eventmanager/types/codec.go (4)
1-8: LGTM! Package and imports are well-structured.
The imports are appropriate for codec registration in a Cosmos SDK module.
23-27: LGTM! Initialization follows Cosmos SDK patterns.
The init function correctly registers all necessary codecs in the appropriate order.
18-21: Document the condition types and verify interface compatibility.
The interface registration looks good, but consider:
- Adding documentation for the ConditionI interface and its implementations
- Ensuring backward compatibility if this is replacing existing functionality
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results. The search shows:
- The
ConditionIinterface is newly defined inx/eventmanager/types/conditions.gowith a clear interface definition that requiresResolvemethod implementation - All condition types (All, And, Or, Count) are properly implemented in
conditions.gowith their respectiveResolvemethods - The conditions are used in multiple modules (participationrewards, interchainstaking) showing this is a new feature, not a replacement
- The proto definitions and registrations are consistent with the interface
Interface registration is correct and no compatibility issues found.
The interface registration follows Cosmos SDK patterns and is being used as intended across modules. The implementation is new and not replacing any existing functionality, so there are no backward compatibility concerns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any existing condition-related interfaces that might be affected
rg -A 5 "type.*Condition.*interface" --type go
# Look for existing usages that might need updates
rg "ConditionI|ConditionAll|ConditionAnd|ConditionOr|ConditionCount" --type go
Length of output: 15051
10-13: Consider documenting the codec variables and verifying Amino usage.
While the implementation follows Cosmos SDK patterns, consider:
- Adding documentation comments explaining the purpose of these codecs
- Verifying if legacy Amino codec is still necessary for your use case, as newer Cosmos SDK versions prefer Protobuf
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify if Amino codec is actually necessary for this module.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Legacy Amino codec is required for this module's functionality
The eventmanager module requires Amino codec support because:
- It implements custom interface types (ConditionI) with dynamic implementations that need Amino codec for proper serialization
- It integrates with core Cosmos SDK types and crypto modules that still use Amino codec
- The module follows the standard Cosmos SDK module pattern with proper codec registration
The current implementation is correct and necessary. Consider adding the following documentation comment above the codec variables:
// amino is the legacy Amino codec required for custom interface serialization and Cosmos SDK compatibility
// ModuleCdc provides Amino codec functionality for the eventmanager module🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if protobuf definitions exist and if we might be missing protobuf codec registration
fd -e proto | grep -l "eventmanager"
# Check other modules' codec implementations for consistency
rg -l "codec.NewLegacyAmino" --type go
Length of output: 766
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any Amino-specific interfaces or types in eventmanager
rg -A 5 "codec\.LegacyAmino|amino\." x/eventmanager/
# Check for any legacy keeper or query handlers that might require Amino
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($var MsgServer) $func($_ context.Context, $msg *$type) (*$resp, error) {
$$$
}' x/eventmanager/
# Check for any custom types that might need Amino encoding
fd . x/eventmanager/types/ -e go --exec head -n 50
Length of output: 11236
x/eventmanager/keeper/abci.go (2)
1-9: LGTM! Imports are appropriate and well-organized.
The imports include all necessary packages for telemetry, SDK functionality, and local event management.
22-22: Previous comment is still valid: Add error handling for TriggerAll.
proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/query.proto (1)
1-10: LGTM! Package and imports are well-structured.
The file follows protobuf best practices with proper package naming and necessary imports.
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.45.0)
4-4: import "cosmos/base/query/v1beta1/pagination.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
x/eventmanager/keeper/grpc_query.go (1)
1-17: LGTM! Well-structured package setup.
Good practice with explicit interface compliance check and organized imports.
x/eventmanager/keeper/client/cli/query.go (2)
1-14: LGTM: Package structure and imports are well-organized
The package structure follows Cosmos SDK conventions with proper organization of imports into standard library, external, and internal groups.
15-31: Verify the impact of DisableFlagParsing
The DisableFlagParsing: true setting might affect how flags are handled in subcommands. Please verify this is intentional.
Consider enhancing the function documentation
Add documentation about available subcommands. Here's a suggested improvement:
-// GetQueryCmd returns the cli query commands for the eventmanager module.
+// GetQueryCmd returns the cli query commands for the eventmanager module.
+// Available Commands:
+// - events: Query events for a given chain✅ Verification successful
DisableFlagParsing setting is consistent with codebase patterns
The DisableFlagParsing: true setting is consistently used across all query and transaction commands in the codebase, including in other modules like mint, participationrewards, interchainstaking, epochs, etc. This is a standard pattern in the codebase and follows the Cosmos SDK CLI implementation approach.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other query commands in the codebase to compare flag parsing settings
rg -A 2 "DisableFlagParsing\s*:" --type go
Length of output: 2929
x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
3-11: Consider adding event-related test utilities
Given that this test suite is for the EventManager keeper, consider importing additional testing utilities that might be needed for:
- Mocking async operations
- Validating event conditions
- Testing callback executions
x/eventmanager/types/keys.go (2)
3-15: LGTM! Module constants follow Cosmos SDK patterns
The module-related constants are well-defined and follow standard Cosmos SDK module patterns.
43-49: LGTM! Field names are well-defined
The field name constants are clear, consistent, and cover the necessary event attributes.
x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper.go (3)
1-14: LGTM! Clean package structure and imports.
31-33: LGTM! Simple and correct getter implementation.
44-47: LGTM! Follows standard Cosmos SDK logging patterns.
proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/genesis.proto (2)
30-47: LGTM! Well-structured enum definitions
The FieldOperator and Comparator enums follow proto3 best practices:
- Include UNSPECIFIED as 0 value
- Have clear, descriptive names
- Use appropriate gogoproto options
4-7: Verify cosmos_proto dependency setup
The static analysis reports that "cosmos_proto/cosmos.proto" is missing. While this import is likely valid, ensure that:
- The cosmos-proto dependency is properly included in your build system
- The proto path is correctly configured in your buf.yaml or equivalent
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if the cosmos.proto file exists and is being used in the codebase before making a final determination.
cosmos_proto import is valid and properly used
The cosmos_proto import is correctly configured and actively used in the file:
- The dependency is present in go.mod
- The import is used with
cosmos_proto.accepts_interfaceannotations on multiple message fields - These annotations are used to define interface acceptance for condition fields, which is a valid use case
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if cosmos-proto is properly configured
if [ -f "buf.yaml" ]; then
echo "Checking buf.yaml configuration..."
cat buf.yaml
fi
# Look for cosmos-proto in go.mod
if [ -f "go.mod" ]; then
echo "Checking cosmos-proto in go.mod..."
grep "cosmos-proto" go.mod
fi
Length of output: 251
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for the actual cosmos.proto file in the repository
fd cosmos.proto
# Check if the proto file is actually used in the code
rg -l "cosmos_proto" proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/
Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how cosmos_proto is actually used in the genesis.proto file
rg -A 5 "cosmos_proto" proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/genesis.proto
# Also check if there are any other proto files in the module using similar imports
fd -e proto . proto/quicksilver/eventmanager/v1/
Length of output: 1219
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.45.0)
4-4: import "cosmos_proto/cosmos.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
app/upgrades.go (2)
16-16: LGTM: Import statement follows conventions
The import statement for the event manager types is correctly placed and follows the project's import path conventions.
80-83: Verify upgrade documentation and migration process
The addition of the event manager module store is a critical operation that requires careful verification:
- Ensure this upgrade is documented in the upgrade specs
- Verify there's a corresponding migration handler
- Confirm no conflicts with other modules' stores
Let's verify the upgrade implementation:
docker-compose.yml (2)
Line range hint 101-108: Verify Hermes v1.8.2 compatibility
The upgrade of Hermes from v1.8.0 to v1.8.2 looks good, but we should verify compatibility with the connected chains.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the changelog information we received. The changes between v1.8.0 and v1.8.2 are primarily bug fixes and improvements, with no breaking changes. However, to make a complete verification, we should check the chain configurations in the repository.
Hermes v1.8.2 upgrade is compatible with the connected chains
The verification shows that the upgrade to Hermes v1.8.2 is safe because:
- The changelog reveals only bug fixes and improvements between v1.8.0 and v1.8.2, with no breaking changes
- The connected chains in the configuration are Cosmos-SDK based chains (Quicksilver, ICA-enabled chain, and Osmosis) which are fully supported
- The configuration format remains compatible, using standard IBC parameters like trusting periods, gas settings, and chain prefixes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Hermes changelog for breaking changes and verify config compatibility
# Check Hermes changelog for breaking changes between v1.8.0 and v1.8.2
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/informalsystems/hermes/v1.8.2/CHANGELOG.md | grep -A 10 "v1.8"
# Verify Hermes config format compatibility
if [ -f "./data/hermes/config.toml" ]; then
echo "Checking Hermes config..."
cat ./data/hermes/config.toml | grep -E "^version|^chains"
fi
Length of output: 2752
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for chain configurations and IBC-related files
fd -t f -e toml -e yaml -e yml . | grep -i -E 'chain|ibc|hermes' | xargs cat 2>/dev/null
# Also check for any docker-compose files that might show connected chains
fd -t f docker-compose | xargs cat
Length of output: 9678
Line range hint 1-124: Verify architecture supports new event management features
The docker-compose setup appears well-structured for testing the new event management system with multiple nodes and relayers. However, let's verify the configuration supports the new features described in the PR objectives.
✅ Verification successful
Docker Compose setup correctly supports event management features
The configuration is well-structured to support event management features:
- Hermes configuration includes proper event source settings with both pull mode and websocket support
- ICQ relayers are configured with necessary RPC and gRPC endpoints for event monitoring
- The codebase shows implementation of event handlers in multiple modules:
x/eventmanager/keeperfor core event managementx/interchainstaking/keeperfor ICS eventsx/participationrewards/keeperfor rewards events
The multi-node setup with three quicksilver nodes, multiple test zones, and two ICQ relayers provides the necessary infrastructure for distributed event handling and processing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify configuration supports new event management features
# Check if quicksilver nodes have necessary event management configs
if [ -f "./data/qstest-1/config/app.toml" ]; then
echo "Checking Quicksilver event management config..."
cat ./data/qstest-1/config/app.toml | grep -A 5 "event"
fi
# Check ICQ configuration for event handling
if [ -f "./data/icq/config.yaml" ]; then
echo "Checking ICQ event handling config..."
cat ./data/icq/config.yaml | grep -A 5 "event"
fi
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any configuration files in the repository
# that might contain event management settings
# Search for config files
echo "Searching for configuration files..."
fd -e toml -e yaml -e json
# Check Dockerfile for any event-related configurations
echo -e "\nChecking Dockerfile for event configurations..."
cat Dockerfile
# Check if there are any event-related patterns in the codebase
echo -e "\nChecking for event-related patterns in the code..."
rg -i "event.*config" -A 3
Length of output: 3848
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the configuration files found in scripts/config/
# as they seem more relevant to our docker-compose setup
echo "Checking ICQ configuration..."
cat scripts/config/icq.yaml
cat scripts/config/icq2.yaml
echo -e "\nChecking Hermes configuration..."
cat scripts/config/hermes.toml
cat scripts/config/hermes-2.toml
# Also check for any event-related code in the quicksilver codebase
echo -e "\nChecking for event handling implementations..."
rg -i "subscribe.*events" -A 3
rg -i "event.*handler" -A 3
Length of output: 13950
test/interchaintest/util/sidecars.go (2)
1-11: LGTM! Package and imports are well-organized.
The imports are appropriate and the package name reflects its utility nature.
55-60: Add validation for RPC addresses.
The RPC addresses from GetRPCAddress() are used without validation. Consider adding checks to ensure they are valid URLs.
app/upgrades/types.go (2)
54-54: Verify the version number sequence
The version number jumps from v1.7.2 to v1.9.0, skipping v1.8.x. While this might be intentional due to the significant changes (Eventmanager feature), please confirm if this version jump is deliberate.
✅ Verification successful
Version sequence jump from v1.7.2 to v1.9.0 appears intentional
Based on the version history in the codebase:
- The upgrade versions follow a clear sequential pattern from v1.2.17 through v1.7.2
- The jump to v1.9.0 aligns with a major feature addition (Eventmanager) and breaking changes
- There are no traces of v1.8.x in the codebase, suggesting this is a deliberate skip
The version bump to v1.9.0 is appropriate given the significant architectural changes (event-driven architecture) and feature additions mentioned in the PR objectives.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any v1.8.x related code or documentation
# Check for any v1.8 references in the codebase
echo "Searching for v1.8 references..."
rg "v1\.8\." --type-add 'docs:*.{md,txt,rst}' --type docs
# Check git tags for v1.8
echo "Checking git tags..."
git tag | grep "v1\.8\."
Length of output: 212
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for version patterns in a broader context
# Check the current version constants in the upgrades file
echo "Current upgrade versions in types.go:"
rg "UpgradeName.*=.*\"v\d+\.\d+\.\d+\"" app/upgrades/types.go
# Check for version patterns in CHANGELOG.md if it exists
echo -e "\nVersion history in CHANGELOG:"
fd -g "CHANGELOG*" -x cat {} | rg "^#+.*v\d+\.\d+\.\d+"
# Check version patterns in go.mod
echo -e "\nModule version in go.mod:"
cat go.mod | rg "^module.*v\d+"
Length of output: 923
54-54: Consider adding testnet upgrade constant
Given that this is a significant upgrade introducing the Eventmanager feature with potential breaking changes, consider adding a corresponding testnet upgrade constant (e.g., V010900rc0UpgradeName) to facilitate testing before mainnet deployment.
x/interchainstaking/types/expected_keepers.go (1)
73-77: Verify interface implementation and usage.
This is a new interface that will require implementation and may affect dependent modules.
Let's verify the implementation and usage:
✅ Verification successful
The previous results show extensive usage of EventManagerKeeper across multiple modules, but we need to verify the actual implementation and constants to ensure the interface changes are properly supported.
The previous results show the struct definitions containing EventManagerKeeper, but we need to verify the actual implementation of the interface methods and the event type constants to ensure compatibility with the interface changes.
The previous results didn't show the implementation details we need. Let's check the event manager keeper implementation in the events.go file and verify the event types in the events.go file within the types package.
We found the event manager implementation files and the AddEvent function signatures, but we need to verify the actual implementation and the event type constants to ensure they match the interface requirements.
Based on the results from our verification attempts, I can now provide a final response:
Interface implementation matches the changes
The implementation in the event manager keeper matches the interface changes:
AddEventimplementation accepts all required parameters: module, chainID, identifier, callback, eventType, status, condition, and payloadAddEventWithExpiryimplementation is present with the correct parametersMarkCompletedis used extensively across the codebase
The interface is properly implemented and widely used across multiple modules (interchainstaking, participationrewards). The changes appear to be a formalization of an existing implementation rather than a breaking change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for interface implementation and usage
# Find potential implementations
echo "Searching for EventManagerKeeper implementations..."
rg -l "type \w+Keeper struct" | xargs rg "EventManagerKeeper"
# Find usage in other modules
echo "Searching for usage in other modules..."
rg "EventManagerKeeper\." --type go
# Check for any existing event type or status constants
echo "Checking for existing event type/status constants..."
rg "const.*Event(Type|Status)" --type go
Length of output: 14549
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the implementation and event type constants
# Check for the implementation of EventManagerKeeper
echo "Checking for EventManagerKeeper implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
$$$
}' | rg -A 5 "EventManagerKeeper"
# Check for event type and status constants in event manager types
echo "Checking event types in eventmanager..."
fd "types" --type f | grep -i "event" | xargs cat
# Check for the interface usage in app initialization
echo "Checking interface wiring..."
rg "EventManagerKeeper" x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper.go
Length of output: 1754
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the event manager implementation and types
# Check event manager types
echo "Checking event manager types..."
rg -A 10 "const.*Event(Type|Status)" x/eventmanager/types/
# Check keeper implementation
echo "Checking keeper implementation..."
rg "func \(k .*Keeper\) (AddEvent|AddEventWithExpiry|MarkCompleted)" x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper.go
# Check event manager module initialization
echo "Checking module initialization..."
rg "New.*Keeper" x/eventmanager/keeper/keeper.go
Length of output: 565
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the event manager implementation in a different location
# Check for implementation files
echo "Checking for event manager implementation files..."
fd -t f . | grep -i "event.*keeper"
# Check for AddEvent implementation
echo "Checking AddEvent implementation..."
rg "func.*AddEvent" x/eventmanager/keeper/events.go
# Check for event types
echo "Checking event types..."
rg "const.*Event" x/eventmanager/types/events.go
Length of output: 883
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the event manager implementation and types
# Check the implementation of AddEvent
echo "Checking AddEvent implementation..."
rg -A 10 "func \(k Keeper\) AddEvent" x/eventmanager/keeper/events.go
# Check event types in types directory
echo "Checking event types in types directory..."
fd "types.go" --type f x/eventmanager/types/ --exec cat {}
# Check for event constants in any file under eventmanager
echo "Checking event constants..."
rg "const.*Event" x/eventmanager/
Length of output: 1147
x/participationrewards/types/participationrewards.go (1)
136-136: Verify the impact of breaking change in ValidatorScores field type
The type change from map[string]*Validator to map[string]*ValidatorScore is a breaking change that could affect existing code.
Let's verify the usage of this field across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results and generate a final response.
Breaking change in ValidatorScores field type is properly handled
The type change from map[string]*Validator to map[string]*ValidatorScore appears to be a safe refactoring as all usages have been properly updated:
- All direct field accesses are in test files (
rewards_validatorSelection_test.go) and have been updated to use the newValidatorScoretype - The keeper implementation (
rewards_validatorSelection.go) correctly initializes and uses the new type - No other direct usages of this field were found in the codebase
- The
ast-grepsearch shows no unexpected dependencies on the oldValidatortype in struct definitions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct field access or method calls using ValidatorScores
rg -A 3 "ValidatorScores" --type go
# Search for any Validator type usage that might need updating
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
$$$
Validator $$$
$$$
}'
Length of output: 10013
test/interchaintest/setup.go (2)
1-8: LGTM!
The package structure and imports are well-organized and follow Go conventions.
75-75: Security consideration: NoHostMount is disabled.
Setting NoHostMount: false allows the container to mount host volumes. This could potentially expose sensitive data or allow unauthorized access in certain scenarios.
x/participationrewards/types/expected_keepers.go (2)
12-12: LGTM!
The import statement for the eventmanager types package follows the codebase conventions and is required for the new EventManagerKeeper interface.
79-82: Review the validator methods for consistency and safety.
A few considerations for the new validator methods:
GetValidatorsAsMapreturns a map whileGetValidatorsreturns a slice. Consider documenting when to use each method to prevent misuse.SetValidatorreturns an error but there's no context about what errors could occur.GetValidatoruses a byte array for the address parameter which could be unsafe if not properly validated.
Let's verify the usage patterns of these methods:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Validator methods are consistently implemented and safe
The code analysis reveals:
-
GetValidatorsAsMapvsGetValidatorsusage is clear and consistent:GetValidatorsis used for iteration and list operationsGetValidatorsAsMapis used for direct validator lookups by address
-
SetValidatorerror handling is properly implemented:- All callers check for errors and handle them appropriately
- Used primarily in test setup and during validator updates
-
GetValidatorbyte array address handling is safe:- All calls properly validate addresses before lookup
- Uses
addressutils.MustValAddressFromBech32for conversion - Proper error handling when validator not found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage patterns of the validator methods
echo "=== GetValidators vs GetValidatorsAsMap usage ==="
rg "GetValidators\(" -A 2
rg "GetValidatorsAsMap\(" -A 2
echo "=== SetValidator error handling ==="
rg "SetValidator\(" -A 2
echo "=== GetValidator address handling ==="
rg "GetValidator\(" -A 2
Length of output: 72885
x/interchainstaking/keeper/validators.go (1)
21-29: Verify EventManagerKeeper integration.
The AI summary mentions EventManagerKeeper integration into the Keeper struct, but it's not visible in this file.
app/keepers/keys.go (1)
29-29: LGTM! Import follows project conventions.
The eventmanager types import is correctly placed and follows the project's import organization pattern.
x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosis.go (2)
22-22: LGTM: Import addition for event manager types
The new import is correctly added and properly aliased for the event management functionality.
Line range hint 91-174: Verify security considerations for proof validation
Please ensure the following security aspects are properly addressed:
- Proof replay protection: The current key caching only works within a single validation call
- Amount calculation: Verify that
DetermineApplicableTokensInPoolhas proper overflow protection - Address validation: Consider additional validation for mapped addresses
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional verification scripts to check for amount calculation overflow protection:
The first search will help verify overflow protection in the amount calculation function, while the second search will check if there's any proof replay protection at the message handler level beyond the per-call key caching.
Let me generate one final verification script to check the implementation of DetermineApplicableTokensInPool:
This will help us verify the overflow protection in the actual implementation of the amount calculation function.
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
Security concerns have been addressed with proper safeguards
The code review has verified that the security considerations are properly handled:
-
Proof replay protection: The key caching within a single validation call is sufficient as the
MsgSubmitClaimhandler inmsg_server.govalidates claims at the protocol level and stores them in state, preventing double-claiming. -
Amount calculation safety: The
DetermineApplicableTokensInPoolimplementation includes proper overflow protection:- Uses safe math operations with
sdk.Decandsdk.Int - Validates for zero division with
if pgamm.IsZero() - Checks for nil/negative amounts before adding to total
- Uses
TruncateInt()for safe decimal to integer conversion
- Uses safe math operations with
-
Address validation: The code has thorough address validation including:
- Base address format validation
- Mapped address verification
- Owner address matching for both direct and mapped addresses
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential proof replay protection in other parts of the codebase
rg -A 5 "MsgSubmitClaim|ValidateClaim"
# Check for amount calculation overflow protection
ast-grep --pattern 'func DetermineApplicableTokensInPool($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 53600
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for amount calculation overflow protection in DetermineApplicableTokensInPool
rg -A 10 "DetermineApplicableTokensInPool"
# Check for proof replay protection at message handler level
rg -A 10 "SubmitClaim.*context"
Length of output: 10667
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the full implementation of DetermineApplicableTokensInPool
rg -l "DetermineApplicableTokensInPool" | xargs cat
Length of output: 22485
x/participationrewards/keeper/keeper.go (2)
54-54: LGTM: EventManagerKeeper integration
The addition of EventManagerKeeper aligns with the PR objectives for enhanced event management capabilities.
165-172:
The method now returns sdk.Coin instead of sdkmath.Int. This is a breaking change that requires updates to all callers of this method.
Let's verify the impact:
Implementation Review: LGTM
The implementation correctly:
- Uses the staking keeper's bond denom
- Retrieves the module's balance
- Includes helpful logging
x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution.go (1)
230-231: Verify impact of decimal truncation on allocations
The truncation of decimal amounts when setting allocations could lead to precision loss, potentially leaving some rewards undistributed. This might be significant with small allocations or many zones.
Consider implementing a mechanism to track and handle "dust" amounts from truncation, especially if the total allocated amount needs to match the input exactly.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the allocation logic and tests to better understand how precision is handled.
Let me analyze the code further to understand how the truncation impacts the total allocations.
Truncation in allocations is properly handled with dust collection
The truncation of decimal amounts in the allocation calculations is actually well-managed in the codebase:
-
The main allocation function collects dust from truncation:
- Calculates the difference between input amount and sum of truncated allocations
- Adds the dust amount to validator allocation to ensure no tokens are lost
-
For holdings distribution:
- Any remaining (undistributed) amounts are tracked
- Undistributed amounts are sent back to the incentives pool
- System logs these remainders for transparency
The current implementation ensures no tokens are lost due to truncation, as all dust is accounted for and redistributed appropriately.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential precision loss in allocations
# Look for any TODO or FIXME comments related to precision handling
rg -A 2 "TODO.*precision|FIXME.*precision"
# Look for existing test cases handling precision
rg -A 5 "TestSetZoneAllocations.*precision|TestUpdateZoneAllocations.*precision"
# Look for any existing precision-related issues
gh issue list --label "precision"
Length of output: 478
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the test file containing allocation tests
fd "distribution_test.go" --exec cat {}
# Look for any tests related to allocation calculations
rg -A 5 "TestSet.*Allocation|TestUpdate.*Allocation"
# Look for any existing decimal/precision handling in the codebase
rg -B 2 -A 2 "TruncateInt|RoundInt" x/participationrewards/
Length of output: 28260
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for any tests that verify total allocations match input amounts
rg -A 10 "TestAllocate.*|TestDistribute.*" x/participationrewards/keeper/
# Check if there's any dust collection or remainder handling
rg -B 2 -A 5 "remainder|dust" x/participationrewards/keeper/
Length of output: 5690
x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_umee.go (5)
20-20: LGTM!
The addition of the eventmanager types import is appropriate for the new event management functionality.
110-120: Similar improvements needed as in the reserves event.
The same enhancements for metadata and error handling apply here.
143-153: Similar improvements needed as in the reserves event.
The same enhancements for metadata and error handling apply here.
214-224: Fix misleading comment and apply previous improvements.
- The code comment "query leverage module balance" is incorrect as this section queries total borrows.
- Same improvements for metadata and error handling apply as mentioned in the reserves event.
- ) // query leverage module balance
+ ) // query total borrows180-190: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider potential race conditions and apply previous improvements.
- Same metadata and error handling improvements apply as mentioned in the reserves event.
- There might be a race condition between the ICQ request and event status. Consider linking the event to the ICQ request to ensure proper state tracking.
icq-relayer/go.mod (1)
14-14: Verify security implications of critical dependency updates
Several security-critical dependencies have been updated. Let's verify there are no known vulnerabilities in these versions:
- prometheus/client_golang v1.20.5
- google.golang.org/grpc v1.67.1
- golang.org/x/crypto v0.29.0
Also applies to: 189-189, 176-176
✅ Verification successful
Security verification completed - Dependencies are using secure versions
After analyzing the security advisories for all critical dependencies:
- prometheus/client_golang v1.20.5: No known vulnerabilities (latest advisory affects <1.11.1)
- google.golang.org/grpc v1.67.1: Clear of recent vulnerabilities (latest advisory affects <1.64.1)
- golang.org/x/crypto v0.29.0: Well above all vulnerable versions (latest advisory requires >=0.17.0)
All dependencies are using versions that include security patches for known vulnerabilities.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for security advisories for critical dependencies
# Check GitHub Security Advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "google.golang.org/grpc") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}
'
# Check for crypto package advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "golang.org/x/crypto") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}
'
Length of output: 3203
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the prometheus/client_golang advisories and check the exact versions in go.mod
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "github.com/prometheus/client_golang") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}
'
# Get exact versions from go.mod
cat icq-relayer/go.mod | grep -E "prometheus/client_golang|google.golang.org/grpc|golang.org/x/crypto"
Length of output: 908
x/participationrewards/keeper/callbacks.go (1)
100-101: LGTM! Verify event completion behavior.
The defer statement correctly ensures event completion tracking, regardless of the execution path.
Let's verify the event completion behavior:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the validator performance event handling to ensure completeness of verification.
Event completion handling is correctly implemented
The deferred event completion is properly placed and works as intended because:
- The
validator_performanceevent is part of a well-defined event chain in the participation rewards module - The defer statement is placed before any error handling, ensuring the event is marked as completed regardless of execution path
- The event completion pattern is consistent with other similar events in the codebase
- The event is properly integrated into the module's workflow, as shown by its usage in hooks.go for condition checking and event chaining
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent event completion handling across the codebase
# Search for other validator performance related events
rg -l "validator_performance"
# Check for similar event completion patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'defer $_.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted($_, $_, $_, "validator_performance")'
Length of output: 1324
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the validator performance related code in the found files
rg -A 5 "validator_performance" x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection.go x/participationrewards/keeper/hooks.go x/participationrewards/keeper/callbacks.go
# Check if there are any error cases that might interfere with event completion
ast-grep --pattern 'if err != nil {
$$$
return err
}' x/participationrewards/keeper/callbacks.go
Length of output: 9156
app/modules.go (6)
58-59: LGTM: Import statements are properly organized.
The new eventmanager imports follow the established import grouping pattern.
112-112: LGTM: Module properly registered in ModuleBasics.
The eventmanager module is correctly registered with the module manager for basic setup operations.
214-214: LGTM: Module properly registered for simulations.
The eventmanager module is correctly added to the simulation modules list, maintaining consistent ordering with appModules.
Line range hint 115-134: Verify module permissions and breaking changes.
-
The module is not listed in
maccPerms. Verify if the eventmanager module requires any specific permissions for managing events or callbacks. -
Since this PR introduces breaking changes, ensure that:
- Existing event handling code is properly migrated
- Dependent modules are updated to use the new event manager
- An upgrade handler is implemented to handle the transition
175-175: Verify module initialization order.
Given that the eventmanager tracks ICA transactions and ICQ queries, consider if it should be initialized after the interchainstaking and interchainquery modules to ensure proper dependency handling.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the module dependencies and initialization order.
Let me check one more aspect to understand the event manager's role in handling ICA/ICQ events.
Module initialization order is correct
The current initialization order is appropriate because:
- The eventmanager is a passive event recording system that doesn't directly depend on ICA/ICQ functionality
- Both interchainstaking and interchainquery modules are initialized before the eventmanager
- The eventmanager is initialized before participationrewards, which uses it as a dependency (as evidenced by the keeper usage)
The module ordering follows the correct dependency chain: ICA/ICQ modules → EventManager → ParticipationRewards
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for dependencies between eventmanager and other modules
# Search for eventmanager keeper usage in other modules
echo "Checking eventmanager keeper usage in other modules:"
rg -l "EventManagerKeeper" --type go
# Search for references to ICA transactions and ICQ queries in eventmanager
echo "Checking ICA and ICQ references in eventmanager:"
rg -l "ica|icq|InterchainAccount|InterchainQuery" --type go --glob "x/eventmanager/**"
Length of output: 1220
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check module dependencies and initialization order
# Search for BeginBlocker and EndBlocker registrations
echo "Checking BeginBlocker and EndBlocker registrations:"
rg "RegisterBeginBlocker|RegisterEndBlocker" app/modules.go -B 2 -A 2
# Check for event handling in eventmanager
echo "Checking event handling in eventmanager:"
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($KEEPER *Keeper) $HANDLER($CTX sdk.Context, $EVENT $TYPE) {
$$$
}' x/eventmanager/keeper/events.go
# Check for hooks registration
echo "Checking hooks registration:"
rg "SetHooks|RegisterHooks" --type go -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 2523
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check event manager's interaction with ICA/ICQ events
# Check event types and handlers
echo "Checking event types in eventmanager:"
rg "type.*Event" x/eventmanager/types/ -A 3
# Check for ICA/ICQ event handling in keeper
echo "Checking ICA/ICQ event handling:"
rg "HandleICA|HandleICQ|OnAck|OnTimeout|OnResponse" x/eventmanager/keeper/ -B 2 -A 2
# Check module initialization order
echo "Checking module initialization order:"
rg "NewAppModule.*Keeper" app/modules.go -B 1 -A 1
Length of output: 5701
246-246: Review endBlockers ordering for the eventmanager module.
The module's placement in beginBlockers (after interchainquery) and initBlockers (before crisis) appears correct. However, the placement in endBlockers at the very end needs verification:
- If the module manages events from other modules (ICA transactions, ICQ queries), it might need to process these before those modules' endBlockers run.
- Consider if any other modules depend on the event manager's end-of-block state.
Also applies to: 306-306, 349-349
✅ Verification successful
Based on the investigation of the eventmanager's EndBlock implementation and its usage across the codebase, I can now provide a final response:
EndBlocker ordering for eventmanager module is correctly placed at the end
The eventmanager's EndBlock functionality only performs cleanup of expired events and doesn't provide any state that other modules depend on during their end block execution. From the implementation in x/eventmanager/keeper/abci.go, we can see that it:
- Only deletes expired events based on their expiry time
- Doesn't expose any state that other modules would need to access during their EndBlock
- Acts as a final cleanup step in the block
The current placement at the end of the EndBlockers order is appropriate as it allows all other modules to complete their end-block operations before cleaning up expired events.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential ordering dependencies in endBlock
# Search for EndBlock implementation in eventmanager
echo "Checking EndBlock implementation:"
rg -A 10 "func.*EndBlock" --type go --glob "x/eventmanager/**"
# Search for eventmanager method calls in other modules' EndBlock
echo "Checking eventmanager usage in other modules' EndBlock:"
rg -B 5 -A 5 "EventManager.*\.(Get|Set|Update|Process)" --type go | rg -B 5 -A 5 "EndBlock"
Length of output: 1906
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any dependencies on eventmanager in other modules
# Search for eventmanager imports and usage in other modules
echo "Checking eventmanager dependencies:"
rg -B 3 -A 3 "eventmanager" --type go --glob "x/**" | grep -v "x/eventmanager"
# Search for any event-related state that might be accessed by other modules
echo "Checking event state access patterns:"
ast-grep --pattern 'keeper.$_.GetEvent($$$)'
# Check if other modules register events that eventmanager processes
echo "Checking event registration patterns:"
ast-grep --pattern 'keeper.$_.RegisterEvent($$$)'
Length of output: 7985
go.mod (3)
320-322: Verify OpenTelemetry dependency versions are aligned.
The OpenTelemetry dependencies should be at compatible versions to ensure proper tracing functionality for the new event management features.
✅ Verification successful
OpenTelemetry dependencies are properly aligned at version 1.29.0
All OpenTelemetry dependencies (otel, otel/metric, otel/sdk, and otel/trace) are consistently using version 1.29.0 across the codebase, ensuring compatibility for tracing functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all OpenTelemetry dependencies are at compatible versions
rg "go.opentelemetry.io/otel" -A 1
Length of output: 2604
7-7: Verify compatibility of updated dependencies.
Key dependency updates:
- cosmossdk.io/math v1.4.0
- github.com/cosmos/go-bip39 v1.0.0
- go.uber.org/zap v1.27.0
- github.com/dgraph-io/ristretto v0.2.0
These updates should be compatible with the new event management features.
Also applies to: 16-16, 38-38, 130-130
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the dependencies and event management features based on the search results.
The search results show that:
- The codebase heavily uses event management features through
EventManagerandEventtypes - The main event management functionality is in the
x/eventmanagermodule - The updated dependencies, particularly
cosmossdk.io/math v1.4.0, are used in conjunction with event management
Let me verify the math package usage specifically:
Based on the analysis of the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Dependencies update is compatible with event management features
The codebase's usage of cosmossdk.io/math v1.4.0 is primarily for mathematical operations in various modules, particularly in:
- Event management system (
x/eventmanager) - Participation rewards (
x/participationrewards) - Interchain staking (
x/interchainstaking) - Third-party chain integrations
The update doesn't introduce breaking changes in the event management functionality, as the math package is used for numerical operations and state management, not for event system architecture.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any breaking changes in the updated dependencies
rg "type Event" --type go
rg "EventManager" --type go
Length of output: 18083
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check usage of cosmossdk.io/math
rg "cosmossdk.io/math" --type go
Length of output: 23817
362-362: Verify the safety bug referenced in the retraction.
The retraction of v1.7.0 needs to be documented for future reference.
Consider adding a link to the issue or PR that documents the safety bug in the retraction message.
app/keepers/keepers.go (5)
70-71: LGTM: Clean import declarations.
The new imports for the event manager types and keeper are properly organized and follow the project's import style.
115-115: LGTM: Clean field addition to AppKeepers struct.
The EventManagerKeeper field is properly placed within the Quicksilver keepers section of the struct.
396-396: LGTM: Proper integration with existing keepers.
The EventManagerKeeper is correctly injected into both InterchainstakingKeeper and ParticipationRewardsKeeper, maintaining proper dependency management.
Also applies to: 415-415
548-548: LGTM: Proper parameter space configuration.
The event manager module's parameter space is correctly registered with the params keeper.
Line range hint 382-435: Consider implementing graceful shutdown for EventManagerKeeper.
The EventManagerKeeper might benefit from implementing a cleanup mechanism for pending events during application shutdown. This could be achieved through a hook into the BaseApp's Close() method.
x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection_test.go (4)
24-24: LGTM: Consistent refactoring of validator scoring system
The test suite has been consistently updated to use the new ValidatorScore structure across all test functions, properly separating distribution and performance scores.
Also applies to: 246-246, 400-400
38-39: LGTM: Comprehensive test coverage for validator selection allocations
The test cases thoroughly cover various scenarios:
- No allocation
- Zero weight intents
- Unit weight intents with same/different validators
- Weighted intents
Each case properly initializes both distribution and performance scores.
Also applies to: 62-70, 93-103, 137-146, 181-191
469-470: LGTM: Comprehensive verification of validator scores
The test properly verifies:
- Individual performance and distribution scores
- Total score calculations
- Score consistency between ValidatorScore and Validator objects
Also applies to: 513-514, 517-518, 521-522
556-556: Verify the keeper method name change
The method name has changed from what appears to be a previous name to CalcPerformanceScores. Ensure this change is reflected in the keeper implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Method CalcPerformanceScores is properly implemented in the keeper
The method is correctly implemented in x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection.go with matching signature and is properly documented. The test and implementation are in sync, and there's no evidence of a recent rename.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the keeper method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($keeper *Keeper) CalcPerformanceScores($ctx, $zone, $rewards, $zs) $ret {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 110
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for the method name in keeper files
rg -l "CalcPerformanceScores" --type go
# Then let's look for any similar method names that might indicate a rename
rg "func.*Performance.*Scores" --type go
Length of output: 306
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at the implementation to verify it's properly defined
rg -A 5 "func \(k Keeper\) CalcPerformanceScores" x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection.go
Length of output: 287
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check git history to see if there was a rename
git log -L :CalcPerformanceScores:x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection.go --oneline
# Also search for any other references to this method
rg "CalcPerformanceScores" --type go -C 2
Length of output: 1966
x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper.go (2)
61-61: LGTM: EventManagerKeeper field addition
The EventManagerKeeper field is properly added to the Keeper struct with appropriate type definition.
714-714: Verify event completion trigger
The event completion is marked after the redemption rate state update, which is the correct sequence. However, let's verify that all callers of UpdateRedemptionRate expect this event completion.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the context further by checking the implementation of UpdateRedemptionRate and its relationship with the event completion.
Event completion is correctly synchronized with redemption rate updates
The verification shows a well-coordinated flow:
- The event "trigger_rr" is added in hooks.go with a pending status
- UpdateRedemptionRate is called in two places:
- Direct call in ibc_packet_handlers.go for reward processing
- Test cases validating the redemption rate calculations
- The event is marked as completed at the end of UpdateRedemptionRate after all state updates
- The sequence ensures atomic completion of the redemption rate update
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all callers of UpdateRedemptionRate to verify event completion expectations
# Search for direct calls to UpdateRedemptionRate
rg -A 3 "UpdateRedemptionRate\("
# Search for any references to the "trigger_rr" event type
rg "trigger_rr"
Length of output: 3452
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full implementation of UpdateRedemptionRate and surrounding context
ast-grep --pattern 'func (k *Keeper) UpdateRedemptionRate($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Check the hooks.go file for the trigger_rr context
rg -B 5 -A 5 "trigger_rr" x/interchainstaking/keeper/hooks.go
Length of output: 2746
x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions_test.go (1)
316-316: Verify integration with EventManager
Given that this PR introduces event management capabilities, we should verify that events are properly emitted during unbonding operations.
Let's check for event-related code in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about event emission in the codebase:
Let me try a different approach to check for event-related code:
Let me check the actual implementation of HandleQueuedUnbondings and its test files more thoroughly:
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Events are already properly integrated with unbonding operations
The codebase shows that unbonding operations are integrated with the event management system through the EventManagerKeeper. Specifically:
- Events are emitted via
AddEventwith typeEventTypeUnbondbefore handling queued unbondings - The event includes relevant parameters and is tracked with
EventStatusPending
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for event emission in HandleQueuedUnbondings implementation
# and related event definitions
# Check HandleQueuedUnbondings implementation for event emission
rg -A 5 "HandleQueuedUnbondings.*\("
# Look for event type definitions related to unbonding
ast-grep --pattern 'const.*Unbond.*Event.*='
Length of output: 3542
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for event emission in HandleQueuedUnbondings implementation
rg -B 5 -A 10 "func.*HandleQueuedUnbondings" x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions.go
# Look for event emission in the file
rg "ctx\.EventManager\(\)\.EmitEvent" x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions.go
# Check for event type definitions
rg "EventType.*=.*\".*unbond.*\"" x/interchainstaking/types/
Length of output: 816
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for event-related code in the types directory
rg "const.*Event.*Type.*=" x/interchainstaking/types/
# Look for event emission in the entire keeper package
rg "EmitEvent|EmitTypedEvent" x/interchainstaking/keeper/
# Check for event attributes related to unbonding
rg "sdk\.Event.*unbond" x/interchainstaking/
Length of output: 1161
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full implementation of HandleQueuedUnbondings
rg -B 10 -A 50 "func \(k \*Keeper\) HandleQueuedUnbondings" x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions.go
# Check test files for any event assertions
rg -A 5 "require\..*Event" x/interchainstaking/keeper/
rg -A 5 "assert\..*Event" x/interchainstaking/keeper/
Length of output: 2805
x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation_test.go (1)
626-626: Verify the purpose and test coverage of the new boolean parameter
The addition of a hardcoded true parameter to PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins warrants further investigation.
Let's check the implementation and test coverage:
Could you please:
- Document the purpose of this boolean parameter
- Consider adding test cases for both
trueandfalsescenarios if not already covered - Consider using a named boolean parameter or constant for better code clarity
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about this function's implementation since the previous search didn't show the actual function definition.
Now I have enough information to generate the final response based on the implementation details found.
The boolean parameter isFlush is correctly used and well-implemented
The true parameter in the test is appropriate as it's used in a flush operation context. From the implementation, we can see that isFlush is used to bypass the dust threshold check when preparing delegation messages:
if allocations[valoper].GTE(zone.DustThreshold) || isFlush {This allows smaller amounts to be delegated during flush operations, which is the exact context where it's being used in the test.
The parameter is also consistently used across the codebase:
- In regular operations: Controlled by
isBatchOrRewards(memo) - In flush operations: Explicitly set to
true
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and test coverage of PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins
# Check the implementation to understand the boolean parameter's purpose
ast-grep --pattern 'func $$$PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Check test coverage for both true/false cases
rg -A 5 'PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins.*true|PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins.*false'
Length of output: 796
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the function definition in keeper files
rg -t go -A 15 "func.*PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins" x/interchainstaking/keeper/
# Look for any other test cases using this function
rg -t go "PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins\(" x/interchainstaking/keeper/
Length of output: 2106
x/participationrewards/keeper/events.go (2)
41-44:
Handle type assertion failure in AddCallback
The type assertion fn.(EventCallback) may fail if fn is not of type EventCallback. This could silently set a nil callback without an error, leading to a possible nil pointer dereference at call time. Consider handling the assertion result.
Apply this diff to handle the type assertion properly:
func (c EventCallbacks) AddCallback(id string, fn interface{}) emtypes.EventCallbacks {
- c.callbacks[id], _ = fn.(EventCallback)
+ if callback, ok := fn.(EventCallback); ok {
+ c.callbacks[id] = callback
+ } else {
+ fmt.Printf("Warning: Provided callback for %s is not of type EventCallback\n", id)
+ }
return c
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
29-34:
Ensure thread safety when accessing callbacks map
If EventCallbacks might be accessed concurrently, consider adding synchronization mechanisms like mutexes to protect the callbacks map from concurrent read/write operations.
Run the following script to check for concurrent usages of EventCallbacks:
x/participationrewards/keeper/allocations.go (5)
13-23: Function GetHoldingAllocation implementation is correct
The function correctly retrieves the holding allocation for a given chainID.
26-30: Function SetHoldingAllocation implementation is correct
The function accurately sets the holding allocation for the specified chainID.
33-43: Function GetValidatorAllocation implementation is correct
The function properly fetches the validator allocation for the provided chainID.
46-50: Function SetValidatorAllocation implementation is correct
The function successfully sets the validator allocation for the given chainID.
52-75: Allocation logic in DetermineAllocations is sound
The DetermineAllocations function correctly calculates and assigns allocations based on the provided moduleBalance and proportions. It handles validations, calculations, and the distribution of any remaining dust appropriately.
x/eventmanager/types/conditions.go (6)
11-14: Interface EMKeeper is well-defined
The EMKeeper interface correctly defines the necessary methods for event management, promoting modularity and abstraction.
16-19: Interface ConditionI correctly extends proto.Message
The ConditionI interface properly extends proto.Message and includes the Resolve method, ensuring compatibility with protobuf serialization.
22-32: Method CanExecute in Event handles condition resolution appropriately
The CanExecute method correctly checks for the presence of an execution condition and resolves it using the ConditionI interface. Error handling is properly implemented.
70-91: Method Resolve in ConditionAnd is implemented correctly
The ConditionAnd.Resolve method accurately evaluates both conditions and returns the logical AND of their results. Error handling is appropriately managed.
105-126: Method Resolve in ConditionOr is implemented correctly
The ConditionOr.Resolve method correctly evaluates both conditions and returns the logical OR of their results. Error handling is properly handled.
144-173: Consider optimizing ConditionCount.Resolve by short-circuiting iteration
The method counts events matching the condition and compares the count after iterating through all events. To improve performance, consider short-circuiting the iteration once the count meets the comparator criteria. For example, if the comparator is GREATER_THAN_OR_EQUAL and the count already equals the target value, there is no need to continue iterating.
x/eventmanager/keeper/events.go (1)
102-102: Check for event status before execution
Ensure that event statuses other than types.EventStatusPending are appropriately handled or logged to prevent unexpected behaviors.
Consider whether additional event statuses need handling in this function.
x/participationrewards/keeper/hooks.go (7)
31-31: Good practice: Early return on error
The addition of return false ensures that the iteration stops upon encountering an error, preventing further processing with invalid data.
80-88: Avoid using panic for error handling
Using panic for error handling can lead to crashes and is not recommended in production code. Instead, handle errors gracefully by logging and returning them.
90-92: Avoid using panic for error handling
98-100: Avoid using panic for error handling
103-105: Avoid using panic for error handling
110-113: Avoid using panic for error handling
114-117: Avoid using panic for error handling
x/participationrewards/keeper/rewards_validatorSelection.go (2)
31-41: Ensure error handling for MakeRequest.
The MakeRequest function call does not handle errors. Consider adding error handling to ensure robustness.
69-71: Good job adding error handling for CalcPerformanceScores.
Error handling has been correctly added to handle errors returned by CalcPerformanceScores, improving the robustness of the function.
x/interchainstaking/keeper/hooks.go (6)
Line range hint 110-121: Error handling for ScheduleQueuedUnbondings is appropriately managed
The error from ScheduleQueuedUnbondings is now properly handled by logging the error while allowing the program to continue, which aligns with the intended control flow.
151-160: Handle JSON marshaling errors gracefully
The previous comment about handling JSON marshaling errors is still applicable.
161-184: Handle condition creation errors gracefully
The previous comment regarding graceful error handling when creating conditions is still valid.
186-193: Handle errors when creating combined conditions
The past comment about improving error handling for combined conditions remains applicable.
260-270: Review error handling for reward conditions
The previous comment on handling errors when creating reward conditions is still relevant.
282-289: Improve error handling for combined conditions
The existing comment about error handling for combined conditions continues to be pertinent.
x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation.go (5)
203-214: Validate the uniqueness and security of the Event ID
The Event ID is generated using fmt.Sprintf("delegation/%s/%x", valoper, sha256.Sum256(msg.GetSignBytes())). While using a hash of msg.GetSignBytes() ensures uniqueness, please confirm that including sign bytes in the Event ID does not expose any sensitive information or pose a security risk.
If necessary, consider using a different approach to generate the Event ID that maintains uniqueness without potential security implications.
293-303: Confirm consistent event logging in WithdrawDelegationRewardsForResponse
The addition of k.EventManagerKeeper.AddEvent enhances event tracking. Please ensure that the event parameters, especially the EventID and EventType, are consistent with the rest of the system for accurate event management and retrieval.
Review the construction of the EventID:
fmt.Sprintf("%s/%s", "withdraw_rewards_epoch", del.ValidatorAddress)Ensure that it aligns with the expected format and does not conflict with other Event IDs in the system.
371-371: Verify handleSendToDelegate function signature and update all usages
A new argument is passed to k.handleSendToDelegate:
err := k.handleSendToDelegate(ctx, zone, &sendMsg, fmt.Sprintf("batch/%d", exclusionTime.Unix()))Please ensure that the handleSendToDelegate function has been updated to accept this new parameter. Additionally, verify that all other calls to this function throughout the codebase have been updated to match the new signature to prevent potential mismatches.
Run the following script to check the function definition and identify any outdated calls:
✅ Verification successful
Function signature matches and all usages are up to date
The verification confirms that:
- The
handleSendToDelegatefunction inx/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.gocorrectly accepts the memo parameter - The only usage of this function in the codebase (in
delegation.go) properly includes all required arguments including the memo
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify 'handleSendToDelegate' function signature and usage.
# Check the function definition to ensure it accepts the new parameter
rg --type go 'func \(.*\) handleSendToDelegate\(ctx sdk.Context, zone \*types.Zone, msg \*banktypes.MsgSend, memo string[^)]*\) error'
# Find calls to 'handleSendToDelegate' missing the new parameter
rg --type go 'handleSendToDelegate\(\s*ctx,\s*zone,\s*&sendMsg\s*(\)|,)'
Length of output: 519
197-214: Ensure all calls to PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins are updated with the new ctx parameter
The function PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins now includes ctx sdk.Context as a parameter. Please verify that all calls to this function throughout the codebase have been updated to include the new ctx parameter to prevent potential runtime errors.
Run the following script to identify any function calls that have not been updated:
✅ Verification successful
All calls to PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins are correctly using the ctx parameter
Based on the search results, all three occurrences of PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins calls in the codebase are already passing the ctx parameter correctly:
x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go:k.PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins(ctx, zone, allocations, isBatchOrRewards(memo))x/interchainstaking/keeper/delegation_test.go:quicksilver.InterchainstakingKeeper.PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins(ctx, &zone, allocations, true)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find calls to 'PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins' missing the 'ctx' parameter.
# Search for calls to the function without 'ctx' as the first argument
rg --type go 'PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins\((?!ctx,)'
Length of output: 342
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find all files that contain calls to PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins
rg --type go "PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins" -l
# Then get the actual calls with context for manual inspection
rg --type go "PrepareDelegationMessagesForCoins" -B 2 -A 1
Length of output: 1395
221-239: Ensure all calls to PrepareDelegationMessagesForShares are updated with the new ctx parameter
The function PrepareDelegationMessagesForShares has been updated to include ctx sdk.Context as a parameter. Please ensure that all calls to this function have been updated accordingly to include the new ctx parameter.
Run the following script to identify any function calls that have not been updated:
✅ Verification successful
All calls to PrepareDelegationMessagesForShares are properly updated with the ctx parameter
Based on the search results, there is only one call to PrepareDelegationMessagesForShares in the codebase, located in x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go. This call already includes the ctx parameter correctly: k.PrepareDelegationMessagesForShares(ctx, zone, msg.Amount).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find calls to 'PrepareDelegationMessagesForShares' missing the 'ctx' parameter.
# Search for calls to the function without 'ctx' as the first argument
rg --type go 'PrepareDelegationMessagesForShares\((?!ctx,)'
Length of output: 345
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all calls to PrepareDelegationMessagesForShares
rg --type go -A 2 "PrepareDelegationMessagesForShares\("
# Also search for the function definition to understand its usage
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_ PrepareDelegationMessagesForShares($$$) $$$'
Length of output: 676
x/interchainstaking/keeper/redemptions.go (1)
173-177: Verify all call sites of HandleQueuedUnbondings are updated
Since the signature of HandleQueuedUnbondings has changed to accept chainId string instead of zone *types.Zone, ensure that all call sites are updated accordingly.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the call sites found in the codebase to verify if they are correctly using the updated function signature.
All call sites are correctly using the updated function signature
After reviewing the context, all call sites of HandleQueuedUnbondings are using the correct signature with chainId string:
- In the test file, it's called with
zone.ChainId - In the task handler, it's called with
params.Zonewhich is a string parameter - In another test case, it's called with
zone.ChainId
All instances are passing the chain ID as a string parameter along with the required epoch and rate parameters, matching the updated function signature.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all call sites of HandleQueuedUnbondings to ensure the signature has been updated.
# Search for calls to HandleQueuedUnbondings
rg --no-filename 'HandleQueuedUnbondings\(' -A 2
Length of output: 717
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's get more context around these calls to better understand the changes
rg --no-filename 'HandleQueuedUnbondings\(' -B 5 -A 5
Length of output: 2026
x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go (5)
31-31: Approved: Added required import for event management
The import of emtypes is necessary for accessing event management types and functions used in the code.
Line range hint 71-86: Improved method chaining in RegisterCallbacks
Returning c directly with chained AddCallback calls enhances code readability and conciseness.
125-125: Ensuring event completion in RewardsCallback
Using defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(...) ensures that the query_rewards_epoch event is marked as completed regardless of how the function exits, improving event lifecycle management.
131-131: Event completion in DelegationsEpochCallback
Adding defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(...) appropriately handles the completion status of the query_delegations_epoch event, ensuring proper event tracking.
675-675: Event completion in DelegationAccountBalancesCallback
Using defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(...) ensures that the query_delegationaccountbalances_epoch event is properly marked as completed after execution.
| Call(ctx sdk.Context, id string, args []byte) error | ||
| Has(id string) bool |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Standardize error handling for callback execution.
The Call method should define specific error types for common failure scenarios:
- Callback not found
- Invalid arguments
- Execution failures
Consider adding error types and improving the interface:
// Add these error definitions
var (
ErrCallbackNotFound = errors.New("callback not found")
ErrInvalidArguments = errors.New("invalid callback arguments")
ErrCallbackExecution = errors.New("callback execution failed")
)
type EventCallbacks interface {
// ... other methods ...
// Call executes the callback, returning specific error types for different failure scenarios
Call(ctx sdk.Context, id string, args []byte) error
}| return func(ctx sdk.Context, _ upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) { | ||
| return mm.RunMigrations(ctx, configurator, fromVM) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for RunMigrations
The migration might fail, and it would be helpful to wrap the error with context about which upgrade failed.
- return mm.RunMigrations(ctx, configurator, fromVM)
+ newVM, err := mm.RunMigrations(ctx, configurator, fromVM)
+ if err != nil {
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to run v1.9.0 upgrade migrations: %w", err)
+ }
+ return newVM, nil📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return func(ctx sdk.Context, _ upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) { | |
| return mm.RunMigrations(ctx, configurator, fromVM) | |
| } | |
| return func(ctx sdk.Context, _ upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) { | |
| newVM, err := mm.RunMigrations(ctx, configurator, fromVM) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to run v1.9.0 upgrade migrations: %w", err) | |
| } | |
| return newVM, nil | |
| } |
| func V010900UpgradeHandler( | ||
| mm *module.Manager, | ||
| configurator module.Configurator, | ||
| appKeepers *keepers.AppKeepers, | ||
| ) upgradetypes.UpgradeHandler { | ||
| return func(ctx sdk.Context, _ upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) { | ||
| return mm.RunMigrations(ctx, configurator, fromVM) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add EventManager migration logic
The upgrade handler currently only runs default migrations without initializing or migrating the new EventManager state. Given that this upgrade introduces the EventManager feature (as per PR objectives), consider adding custom migration logic to:
- Initialize EventManager state
- Migrate any existing async operations to the new event system
- Handle potential data inconsistencies during migration
Here's a suggested structure:
func V010900UpgradeHandler(
mm *module.Manager,
configurator module.Configurator,
appKeepers *keepers.AppKeepers,
) upgradetypes.UpgradeHandler {
return func(ctx sdk.Context, _ upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {
+ // Initialize EventManager state
+ if err := initializeEventManager(ctx, appKeepers); err != nil {
+ return nil, err
+ }
+
+ // Migrate existing async operations if needed
+ if err := migrateAsyncOperations(ctx, appKeepers); err != nil {
+ return nil, err
+ }
+
return mm.RunMigrations(ctx, configurator, fromVM)
}
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| func RegisterLegacyAminoCodec(cdc *codec.LegacyAmino) { | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implementation required for RegisterLegacyAminoCodec.
The empty implementation suggests missing codec registrations. Based on the PR objectives and interface registrations below, this function should register types for:
- Event types
- Condition types (All, And, Or, Count)
- Any custom types used in ICA transactions and ICQ queries
Would you like me to provide an example implementation for the codec registrations?
| k.IteratePrefixedEvents(ctx, nil, func(_ int64, eventInfo types.Event) (stop bool) { | ||
| if eventInfo.ExpiryTime.Before(ctx.BlockTime()) { | ||
| k.Logger(ctx).Info("deleting expired event", "module", eventInfo.Module, "id", eventInfo.Identifier, "chain", eventInfo.ChainId) | ||
| k.DeleteEvent(ctx, eventInfo.Module, eventInfo.ChainId, eventInfo.Identifier) | ||
| } | ||
| return false | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add nil check in the iterator callback.
The callback function should validate the eventInfo before accessing its fields to prevent potential panics.
k.IteratePrefixedEvents(ctx, nil, func(_ int64, eventInfo types.Event) (stop bool) {
+ if eventInfo.Module == "" || eventInfo.ChainId == "" || eventInfo.Identifier == "" {
+ k.Logger(ctx).Error("invalid event data encountered", "event", eventInfo)
+ return false
+ }
if eventInfo.ExpiryTime.Before(ctx.BlockTime()) {Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| k.EventManagerKeeper.AddEvent( | ||
| ctx, | ||
| types.ModuleName, | ||
| query.ChainId, | ||
| fmt.Sprintf("query_delegationaccountbalance_epoch/%s", coin.Denom), | ||
| "", | ||
| emtypes.EventTypeICQAccountBalance, | ||
| emtypes.EventStatusActive, | ||
| nil, | ||
| nil, | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Validate coin.Denom before adding events
When adding an event with the identifier fmt.Sprintf("query_delegationaccountbalance_epoch/%s", coin.Denom), ensure that coin.Denom is validated to prevent issues due to invalid or unsafe characters.
Consider adding validation or sanitization for coin.Denom before incorporating it into the event identifier to maintain robustness and prevent potential issues.
| @@ -927,6 +932,9 @@ func (k *Keeper) HandleFailedUndelegate(ctx sdk.Context, msg sdk.Msg, memo strin | |||
| if !found { | |||
| return fmt.Errorf("zone for delegate account %s not found", undelegateMsg.DelegatorAddress) | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(ctx, types.ModuleName, zone.ChainId, fmt.Sprintf("unbond/%s/%s", undelegateMsg.ValidatorAddress, sha256.Sum256(undelegateMsg.GetSignBytes()))) | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect string formatting when formatting hash values
The fmt.Sprintf function uses %s to format the byte array returned by sha256.Sum256, which is incorrect. You should use %x to format the hash value in hexadecimal representation to prevent unexpected results.
Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
- defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(ctx, types.ModuleName, zone.ChainId, fmt.Sprintf("unbond/%s/%s", undelegateMsg.ValidatorAddress, sha256.Sum256(undelegateMsg.GetSignBytes())))
+ defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(ctx, types.ModuleName, zone.ChainId, fmt.Sprintf("unbond/%s/%x", undelegateMsg.ValidatorAddress, sha256.Sum256(undelegateMsg.GetSignBytes())))Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| return err | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| valoper := strings.Split(redeemMsg.Amount.Denom, "/")[0] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling when splitting redeemMsg.Amount.Denom
The code assumes that redeemMsg.Amount.Denom contains at least one "/" character. If it doesn't, accessing valoperParts[0] may cause a panic. Consider adding error handling to ensure redeemMsg.Amount.Denom has the expected format.
Consider applying the following changes:
+ if redeemMsg.Amount.Denom == "" {
+ return errors.New("redeemMsg.Amount.Denom is empty")
+ }
valoperParts := strings.Split(redeemMsg.Amount.Denom, "/")
+ if len(valoperParts) < 1 {
+ return fmt.Errorf("invalid denomination format: %s", redeemMsg.Amount.Denom)
+ }
valoper := valoperParts[0]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| valoper := strings.Split(redeemMsg.Amount.Denom, "/")[0] | |
| if redeemMsg.Amount.Denom == "" { | |
| return errors.New("redeemMsg.Amount.Denom is empty") | |
| } | |
| valoperParts := strings.Split(redeemMsg.Amount.Denom, "/") | |
| if len(valoperParts) < 1 { | |
| return fmt.Errorf("invalid denomination format: %s", redeemMsg.Amount.Denom) | |
| } | |
| valoper := valoperParts[0] |
| // given that there _could_ be a backlog of message, we don't want to bail here, else they will remain undeliverable. | ||
| k.Logger(ctx).Error(err.Error()) | ||
| } | ||
| defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(ctx, types.ModuleName, zone.ChainId, fmt.Sprintf("unbond/%s/%s", undelegateMsg.ValidatorAddress, sha256.Sum256(undelegateMsg.GetSignBytes()))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect string formatting when formatting hash values
The fmt.Sprintf function uses %s to format the byte array returned by sha256.Sum256, which is incorrect. You should use %x to format the hash value in hexadecimal representation to prevent unexpected results.
Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
- defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(ctx, types.ModuleName, zone.ChainId, fmt.Sprintf("unbond/%s/%s", undelegateMsg.ValidatorAddress, sha256.Sum256(undelegateMsg.GetSignBytes())))
+ defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(ctx, types.ModuleName, zone.ChainId, fmt.Sprintf("unbond/%s/%x", undelegateMsg.ValidatorAddress, sha256.Sum256(undelegateMsg.GetSignBytes())))📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(ctx, types.ModuleName, zone.ChainId, fmt.Sprintf("unbond/%s/%s", undelegateMsg.ValidatorAddress, sha256.Sum256(undelegateMsg.GetSignBytes()))) | |
| defer k.EventManagerKeeper.MarkCompleted(ctx, types.ModuleName, zone.ChainId, fmt.Sprintf("unbond/%s/%x", undelegateMsg.ValidatorAddress, sha256.Sum256(undelegateMsg.GetSignBytes()))) |
| @@ -1018,6 +1026,9 @@ | |||
| return fmt.Errorf("zone for delegate account %s not found", redeemMsg.DelegatorAddress) | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| valoper := strings.Split(redeemMsg.Amount.Denom, "/")[0] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling when splitting redeemMsg.Amount.Denom
The code assumes that redeemMsg.Amount.Denom contains at least one "/" character. If it doesn't, accessing valoperParts[0] may cause a panic. Consider adding error handling to ensure redeemMsg.Amount.Denom has the expected format.
Consider applying the following changes:
+ if redeemMsg.Amount.Denom == "" {
+ return errors.New("redeemMsg.Amount.Denom is empty")
+ }
valoperParts := strings.Split(redeemMsg.Amount.Denom, "/")
+ if len(valoperParts) < 1 {
+ return fmt.Errorf("invalid denomination format: %s", redeemMsg.Amount.Denom)
+ }
valoper := valoperParts[0]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| valoper := strings.Split(redeemMsg.Amount.Denom, "/")[0] | |
| if redeemMsg.Amount.Denom == "" { | |
| return errors.New("redeemMsg.Amount.Denom is empty") | |
| } | |
| valoperParts := strings.Split(redeemMsg.Amount.Denom, "/") | |
| if len(valoperParts) < 1 { | |
| return fmt.Errorf("invalid denomination format: %s", redeemMsg.Amount.Denom) | |
| } | |
| valoper := valoperParts[0] |
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you! |
1. Summary
Eventmanager provides a simple way of tracking asyncronous tasks, and conditionally executing callbacks.
This allows us to better track the results of ICA txs and ICQ queries beyond maintaining a single integer waitgroup tracking sent and received txs, which is fraught with all manner of race conditions.
2.Type of change
3. Implementation details
Implement the concept of events. An event can be any asyncronous task, such as an ICA tx, an ICQ query, or an unbonding transaction, amongst others.
Completion of the event, can be triggered by programmatically complete()ing the event, or based on block time (e.g. for unbonding txs).
In addition we introduce the concept of future events. A future event is a callback that can be triggered when some condition is satisfied. For example, call CalculateRedemptionRate() IF no event of type WithdrawRewards or Redelgate is still active. These conditions are evaluated based at the point other events are marked completed, and the callback triggered if the conditions are satisfied.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
EventManagerKeeperto manage events for the interchain staking process.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests